September 2025

Trump

Trump’s fascist conspiracy and how to fight it: A socialist strategy

Socialist Equality Party (US)

This statement was published originally in the World Socialist Web Site on the 19 September 2025.

In the week since the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the Trump administration has escalated its conspiracy to establish a presidential dictatorship.

The policy of the Trump regime was spelled out clearly by fascist strategist Stephen Bannon, one of Trump’s closest political allies. “If we are going to go to war,” he declared, “let’s go to war.” The Trump administration is waging a war—against the population, against democratic rights, against Constitutional government.

Trump
President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Sept. 19, 2025, in Washington. [AP Photo/Alex Brandon]

This war is being conducted within the framework of the public deification of Kirk. Over the past week, the White House has spearheaded a campaign to ban all criticism of the Trump administration. Workers, including teachers, airline staff and others, have been fired for critical social media posts about Kirk. 

On Wednesday, ABC/Disney announced that it was suspending Jimmy Kimmel Live!, after Kimmel made mild, accurate remarks on Monday about the political exploitation of Kirk’s killing. The move followed an explicit directive from the White House and its enforcers. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) Chair Brendan Carr threatened broadcasters, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” Nexstar and Disney, desperate to protect multibillion-dollar mergers and profits, rushed to comply.

In interviews Thursday, Carr declared that Kimmel’s suspension was not the “last shoe to drop,” calling for a “massive shift that’s taking place in the media ecosystem.” On the same day, Trump himself declared that regulators should revoke the licenses of broadcasters who air “negative coverage” of him.

The critical question now is: What must be done to stop this drive to dictatorship? In answering this question, it is necessary to identify the political context of Trump’s attempt to overthrow the Constitution, the class and economic interests that underlie the actions of the government, the social force that has the power to defend democratic rights, and the political strategy and program upon which the fight against Trump must be based.

First, it is necessary to put aside all self-deluding hopes that what is unfolding is anything less than a drive to establish a presidential dictatorship, based on the military, police, paramilitary forces and fascist gangs. The essential purpose of the glorification of Charlie Kirk has been to provide a martyr symbol to galvanize the most reactionary forces in the country.

As the World Socialist Web Site has warned, the Hitler admirers in Trump’s inner circle, such as Vice President JD Vance and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, are working off the playbook written by the Nazis. Kirk is the Trump regime’s “Horst Wessel” (the name of a murdered storm trooper) and the assassination is their equivalent to the infamous Reichstag Fire, the burning of the German parliament building, which was seized upon by Hitler to claim absolute power in March 1933.

The cancellation of the Jimmy Kimmel show is yet another action based on the tactics of the Nazi regime. Any form of speech, including jokes, that was deemed insulting to the honor and dignity of Hitler was treated as a criminal offense that merited drastic punishment. The “Heil Hitler” salute became an obligatory form of greeting, even between friends.

Second, Trump is not acting on his own. However grotesque his individual qualities, he represents the interests of the corporate and financial oligarchy. Here again, the parallels to Nazi Germany are chilling. It is a historical fact that Hitler’s rise to power would not have been possible without the resources provided to the Nazi movement by leading German capitalists. Once in office, Hitler’s brutal regime served the interests of German banks and corporations, and they supported his dictatorship.

If anything, the alliance of Trump and today’s financial-corporate oligarchy is even more intense than that which prevailed in Nazi Germany. It can be described, without exaggeration, as a love affair. In the midst of Trump’s assault on democratic rights, he was feted last week at a White House dinner, where a gang of mega-millionaires and billionaires sang his praises. An even more obscene spectacle was staged this week at Windsor Castle in Britain. Seated next to King Charles III, Trump was feted at a state banquet by a retinue of oligarchs, including Tim Cook of Apple, Sam Altman of OpenAI, Satya Nadella of Microsoft, Ruth Porat of Alphabet, financiers Steve Schwarzman of Blackstone, Jane Fraser of Citigroup, Larry Fink of BlackRock and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America.

Third, underlying the public reverence for Trump are cold-blooded economic and political calculations. The staggering concentration of wealth in an infinitesimal segment of the population is not compatible with democratic forms of rule. The rich are convinced that the defense of their wealth and their unrestricted exploitation of the working class is incompatible with democracy. Dictatorship is their preferred form of political rule.

However, the oligarchy’s reasons for supporting the overthrow of whatever remains of American democracy extend beyond their uncontainable lust for ever greater heaps of money and personal wealth. The American ruling class is acutely conscious of and terrified by the existential crisis of the capitalist system. It is aware that the national debt—now approaching $40 trillion—is unsustainable. 

The oligarchs are convinced that a massive assault on the living standards and even the lives of the working class is necessary. All the social reforms extending back to the Progressive era of the first two decades of the 20th century, the New Deal of the 1930s, and the Great Society of the 1960s must be ended. Critical programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are to be all but eliminated. The war on medicine—to the point of ending vaccinations against COVID, measles, mumps, polio, whooping cough, and other deadly illnesses—is aimed at substantially raising infant and child mortality and lowering life expectancy.

The wiping out of regulations that provided any sort of protection against injury and death in factories, mines, depots, shipyards, and other workplaces is a major objective. 

Yet another factor in the political calculations of the capitalist elites is the geo-political crisis confronting American imperialism. The protracted deterioration in the global economic and strategic position of the United States has reached critical dimensions. The rise of China and the development of an alliance of states challenging American hegemony cannot be stopped except through war. The militarization of the United States demands ever greater expenditures, which, in turn, intensifies the pressure to slash social expenditures and wages. Moreover, the preparation and launching of wars requires the violent suppression of domestic political opposition.

These are the objective factors that underlie the collapse of American democracy. Trump’s policies are those of the ruling class. This is not to ignore the specific pathological features of his personality and that of his MAGA cabal that impart to this regime its particularly degenerate character. But even if the workings of actuarial statistics were to suddenly remove Trump from the scene, it would not halt the drive to dictatorship. The war on democracy and the working class would continue.

This objective cause of the breakdown of democracy is verified by the fact that parallel processes are being manifested in all major capitalist countries. Throughout Europe neo-fascist parties are gaining strength. The drive toward dictatorship is a global phenomenon. 

Fourth, the correct identification of the source of Trump’s war against the working class leads to critical political conclusions. The starting point of any serious struggle against dictatorship is a break with the Democratic Party. To rely on the Democratic Party to oppose Trump is to guarantee defeat.

The Democrats are, like the Republicans, a party of Wall Street, the Pentagon, and the corporate-financial oligarchy. What they fear above all is not the rise of fascism but the eruption of a mass movement from below that threatens the foundations of capitalist rule. This accounts for the Democratic Party’s cowardly capitulation to the fascist glorification of Kirk and its feckless response to the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel and all the previous dictatorial decrees issued by Trump.

The prostration of the Democratic Party was exposed when the US Senate unanimously approved a resolution marking October 14, Kirk’s birthday, as a “National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk.” Not one Democrat, including Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, had the courage to object. It would have been sufficient, and politically correct, to oppose the assassination on principled grounds, i.e., that the killing of one or another despicable figure serves absolutely no progressive interest, that it sows confusion among workers and youth and that it plays into the hands of the reactionaries.

But to sanction the elevation of Kirk—a man whose record of racism, antisemitism, opposition to civil rights, and promotion of authoritarian violence is well documented—as a national hero is obscene. Yet Sanders and the Democrats joined in this sanctification.

The next day, 90 Democrats, including the party’s leadership, voted with Republicans in the House to pass a resolution “honoring the life and legacy of Charles Kirk,” praising the fascist provocateur as a martyr for “freedom” and “civil discourse,” and a “fierce defender” of “life, liberty, limited government, and individual responsibility.” 

Fifth, the development of the struggle to defeat Trump must be based on the mobilization of the multimillioned working class—the social force that has the power, if mobilized on the basis of a correct political strategy, to defeat Trump and drive him from office.

The key elements of this strategy are: 

1) The complete political and organizational independence of the working class from the Democratic Party and its collaborators and apologists, i.e., the DSA, Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the myriad middle class organizations and individuals who believe that shouting obscenities on various social media platforms will stop Trump. These are the methods of frustrated liberals who hope that their hysterical rhetoric will move the Democratic Party to fight Trump.

2) The building of a new form of organization that can unify the working class and mobilize its vast industrial and economic power against the Trump regime. This new form of organization proposed by the Socialist Equality Party consists of rank-and-file committees. They must be established in every factory, workplace, school and neighborhood to organize resistance to Trump’s dictatorship. These committees must become centers of resistance, uniting all sections of the working class (in industry, logistics, transport, restaurants and fast food, social services, legal defense, education, arts and culture, entertainment, medicine, health care, sciences, computer technology, programming and other highly specialized professions) and student youth against Trump’s fascist government, the complicity of the Democrats, and the broader assault on democratic rights and living standards. 

The building of rank-and-file committees is essential to break the stranglehold of the trade union bureaucracies, which function as industrial police for the corporations and utilize their power to block every form of resistance by the working class. Power must be transferred from the offices of the bureaucratic parasites to the workers on the shop floor and job sites, where decisions on all matters of strategy, policy and action can be made democratically by the working class.

These rank-and-file committees, spreading across all workplaces, will create new centers of coordinated social power upon which the defense of democracy throughout the country can be based. The mobilized working class will be able to inspire with confidence and unify all the now disparate elements of protest in a massive social movement against the hated government led and controlled by capitalist oligarchy.

3) This movement, led by the working class, requires a program that accurately reflects socio-economic realities and corresponds to the interests of the overwhelming majority of the population. The capitalist oligarchy has declared war on the working class. The necessary response is the declaration of war by the working class on capitalism, which must result in the socialist reorganization of society. This entails the establishment of public ownership and democratic control by the working class of major industries, banks, utilities and natural resources. Moreover, the obscene levels of wealth concentrated in the approximately 900 billionaires must be expropriated. The 400 richest Americans alone hold a combined wealth of $6.6 trillion, which represents a growth by more than $1 trillion over the previous year. The concentration of so much money and power is a social malignancy that kills democracy.

4) The most important element of this strategy—upon which the implementation and realization of all previous elements depends—is internationalism. No effective struggle can be waged by workers in the United States unless their actions are coordinated and aligned with the struggles of the global working class. The threat of fascism is an international phenomenon. The capitalist ruling class of every country has its own version of Trump and even Hitler. American workers must repudiate the reactionary, outdated and self-defeating ideology of nationalism, which is the primal evil that instigates the racism and ethnic hatreds utilized by fascism. It is not an accidental coincidence that Trump launched his drive for dictatorship by unleashing a savage assault on immigrants. The deprivation of their democratic rights was only the first stage in the overthrow of the Constitution. The masked ICE agents who prowl through cities are the vanguard of the fascist paramilitary that Trump is planning to unleash against all sections of the working class.

An inseparable corollary of the fight for the international unity of American workers with their class brothers and sisters beyond the borders of the United States is irreconcilable opposition to US imperialism, militarism and war. The Gaza genocide carried out by the Zionist regime, which has to a great extent been carried out with weapons provided by the United States, reveals the barbarism of which capitalism is capable. The mass murder of Palestinians sanctioned by all the imperialist powers is an anticipation of what the capitalist oligarchs are prepared to inflict against the workers in their “own” countries.

It flows from this internationalist strategy that the rights of immigrants must be defended against the criminal and inhumane policy of deportation. The principle of birthright citizenship, inscribed in the Constitution, must be defended without compromise. Further, the class-conscious worker rejects the insidious and cruel distinction between the “native” and “foreign born.” Moreover, sanctions and tariffs imposed by the Trump administration must be opposed. The working class cannot defend its jobs and interests by supporting economic nationalism, which is entirely reactionary in an era of the global integration of production. The working class can advance its interests only by demanding the tearing down of national boundaries, which not only strangle the development of the productive forces but also lead mankind down the terrible path to nuclear world war.

Even before Trump began his second term and launched his drive for dictatorship, the Socialist Equality Party issued a call for the formation of the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC). This initiative has not only been vindicated. Its development has acquired burning urgency.

5) The strategy, organization and action that are necessary to defeat Trump, defend democratic rights, and prevent fascism and war will not emerge spontaneously. This program must be fought for. But the determination that is required to take up and wage this fight is incompatible with pessimism and demoralization. These moods lead to paralysis. Moreover, pessimism is invariably connected to a superficial and false appraisal of reality. The Democrats, the unions and the media cultivate the myth of an all-powerful government while insisting that nothing can be done. This is a lie. What is lacking is not mass opposition but, rather, a political strategy to guide and organize the struggle against Trump’s assault on democratic rights.

The Socialist Equality Party advances this program as the basis for the struggle against Trump and the degenerate oligarchy which he represents. Our program is not for the pessimists, the skeptics and the demoralized, but for the fighters among workers, students, youth, professionals, artists and intellectuals. There is no time to lose.

We call on all workers and young people who agree with this perspective to join the Socialist Equality Party, mobilize the power of the working class, defeat the conspiracy of the oligarchs and fight for a socialist future without fascism, genocide and war

Trump’s fascist conspiracy and how to fight it: A socialist strategy Read More »

Healy

ජී. හීලි නෙරපා හරී: හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුවේ (හජජාක) යෝජනාව – 1985 නොවැම්බර් 01

හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුව (හජජාක).

මෙහි නැවත පළකෙරෙන මෙම හජජාක යෝජනාව 1985 නොවැම්බර් 01 සිකුරාදා කම්කරු මාවත පත්‍රයේ පළ කෙරුණකි. හීලිගේ ජාතික අවස්ථාවාදය, කම්කරු විප්ලවවාදී පක්ෂය තුළ කල්ලිවාදී ගැටුම හා අවසානයේ එය ට්‍රොට්ස්කිවාදය පාවාදීම කෙරේ ගමන් කිරීම දක්වා ඉතිහාසය තුල එම පාවාදීමට එරෙහි ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුවේ අරගලයේ ප්‍රධානම සන්දිස්ථානයක් ලෙස ජෙරී හීලි නෙරපා හැරීම සැලකිය යුතුය. කවිපයේ ජාතික අවස්ථාවාදයේ ස්වරූපය අවබෝධකර ගැනීම සඳහා එම අරගලයේ ලේඛන බැරෑරුම්ව හා මූලධර්මාත්මකව හැදෑරිය යුතුය. එම හැදෑරීම හුදෙක් අතීත අත්දැකීමක් අවබෝධ කර ගැනීම සඳහා පමණක් නොව අපගේම ව්‍යාපාරයේ ඉතිහාසය හා වර්ථමානය අවබෝධ කරගැනීමේ හා පාඩම් උගැන්මේ අත්‍යවශ්‍ය කර්තව්‍යය කි. 

හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුවේ (හජජාක) යෝජනාව 

හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුව 1985 ඔක්තෝම්බර් 25 දා රැස්වීමේ දී පහත යෝජනාව සම්මත කලේය.

Healy
Gerry Healy, 1964

ජී.හීලි සිය සාමාජිකත්වයෙන් නෙරපා හරින හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුව (හජජාක) ඔහු බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය ශාඛාවෙන් නෙරපා හැරීමට කම්කරු විප්ලවවාදී පක්ෂයේ (කවිප) මධ්‍යම කාරක සභාව ගත් තීන්දුව අනුමත කරයි. 

හජජාක සහ කවිපයේ කේඩරය සිය පෞද්ගලික අරමුණු සඳහා යොදා ගනිමින් ද ඔවුන්ගේ අයිතීන් උල්ලංගනය කරමින් ද හීලි දීර්ග කාලහක් තිස්සේ ඔහුගේ දේශපාලන ආධිපත්‍යය බරපතලව වැරදි ලෙස පාවිච්චි කළේය. 

එසේ කිරීමේදී ඔහු හජජාකවේ සියලු ශාඛාවන් ඔහු කෙරේ රැඳවූ දේශපාලනික පිලිගැනීම හා විශ්වාසය වැරදි ලෙස පාවිච්චි කළේය.

ඔහු ගෙන ගිය භාවිතයන්, ට්‍රොට්ස්කිවාදී ව්‍යාපාරයේ ඓතිහාසිකව තේරුණු කේඩරයට පහර එල්ල කිරීමකින් සමන්විත විය. 

හීලි නෙරපා හැරීමට පාදක වූ හේතු පිළිබඳ දැවැන්ත සාක්ෂි හජජාක සතුවේ. 

ජී. හීලි විසින් කරන ලද දේශපාලනික එකතු කිරීම් හජජාක කිසිසේත් අමතක කර හෝ නොතකා නැත. එහෙත් මෙ  වැරදි කොතරම් බරපතල වන්නේද යත් මෙම ක්‍රියාමාර්ගය අනුගමනය කිරීම හජජාකවේ යුතුකම හා වගකීම වන්නේ ය. 

හජජාක තුළ දූෂනය ඉවසීමක් නැත. සියලුම නායකයින් සිය කටයුතු ගැන වග උත්තර කිව යුතු අතර පක්ෂයේ ව්‍යවස්ථාවට පිටින් ඔවුනට ක්‍රියා කළ නොහැක. 

තමාට එල්ල වූ චෝදනා බිඳ හෙළීමට හෝ තමා නෙරපා හැරීමට එරෙහිව කරුණු දැක්වීමට හෝ හීලි කිසිවිටෙකත් හජජාකව මුණ ගැසීමට කිසිදු උත්සාහයක් නොදැරීය.

ඊට විපරීතව, මෑත කාලයේ දී ඔහු‍, තමා දේශපාලන කුමන්ත්‍රණයක ගොදුරක් වී ඇතැයි පෙන්නුම් කිරීමටත් හජජාකවේ ප්‍රමුඛ සාමාජිකයන්ට එරෙහිව දුෂ්ට අවලාද ව්‍යාපාරයක් ගෙන යාමටත් තම පෞද්ගලික සම්බන්ධතා යොදා ගනිමින් හජජාකව තුළ ප්‍රතිපත්ති විරහිත කණ්ඩායමික ව්‍යාපාරයක් ගෙන ගියේය. 

හීලි නෙරපා හැරීමේදී, ඔහු අතීතයේ කරන ලද දේශපාලන එකතු කිරීම්, විශේෂයෙන්ම පැබ්ලෝවාදී සංශෝධනවාදයට එරෙහිව 1950 සහ 1960 ගණන්වල කරන ලද අරගලය, ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කිරීමේ අපේක්ෂාවක් හජජාකවට නැත. 

ඇත්තවශයෙන්ම නම් මේ නෙරපා හැරීම වනාහී, එම අතීත අරගලයන් පදනම් කෙරුණු ට්‍රොට්ස්කිවාදී මූලධර්මයන් ඔහු විසින් ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කිරීමේත් ඉතා ග්‍රාම්‍ය අවස්ථාවාදය කරා ඔහුගේ පල්ලම් බැසීමේත් අවසාන ප්‍රතිඵලය වේ. 

බ්‍රිතාන්‍යයේ ට්‍රොට්ස්කිවාදී ව්‍යාපාරයේ ප්‍රායෝගික හා සංවිධානාත්මක ජයග්‍රහණයන් ඒවාම පැන නැංවූවා වූ ස්ටැලින්වාදයටත්, සංශෝධනවාදයටත් එරෙහිව ඓතිහාසිකවත් ජාත්‍යන්තරවත් මුල් විහිදුනු අරගලයන් ගෙන් වඩ වඩාත් වෙන් කර ලීම වෙත හීලි ගේ දේශපාලනික හා පෞද්ගලික පරිහාණිය පැහැදිලිව ඇදී යයි. 

පක්ෂ තන්ත්‍රයේ වැඩීම තහවරු කිරීම වටා කේන්ද්‍රනය වූ ක්ෂනික ප්‍රායෝගික අවශ්‍යතා වලට මූළධර්මාත්මක ප්‍රශ්න වැඩි වැඩියෙන් යටත් කිරීම, දේශපාලනික අවස්ථාවාදය කරා පිරිහෙමින් ලෝකයේ පැරණිම ධනවාදී රටෙහි අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී පීඩනයන්ට ප්‍රතිබද්ධ ඔහුගේම දේශපාලනික හා සදාචාරාත්මක රැකවරනයන් වේගයෙන් ඛාදනය කර දැමීය. 

මෙම තතු යටතේ ඔහුගේ බරපතල ආත්මීය දුබලතා වඩ වඩාත් අන්තරාය කාරී දේශපාලන කාර්‍යයක් ඉටු කළේය. 

කවිපය හා හජජාකය තුළ තව තවත්, හිතුවක්කාරී ලෙස ක්‍රියා කරමින් හීලි, ලෝක පක්ෂයේ ඉදිරි පියවරයන් සම්බන්ධ කළේ හතරවැනි ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ මාක්ස්වාදී මූලධර්ම වලට හා එහි කේඩරයේ සාමූහික අරගලයට නොව ඔහුගේම  පෞද්ගලික දක්ෂතාවයන්ටය.

තම අන්තරකරණීය තීරණයන් තමා විසින්ම වර්ණනා කර ගැනීම නොවැලැක්විය හැකි ලෙසම යොමු වූයේ භෞතිකවාදී අපෝහකවාදය බරපතලව විකෘති කිරීම කරාත් හීලි දැඩි ආත්මීය විඥානවාදියෙකු හා තත්කාර්‍යවාදියෙකු බවට පරිවර්තනය වීම කරාත් ය. 

ජාත්‍යන්තර ට්‍රොට්ස්කිවාදී ව්‍යාපාරයේ කේඩරය වර්ධනය කිරීම පිළිබඳ සංකීර්ණ ගැටළු කෙරෙහි ඔහුගේ පෙර පැවති උනන්දුව වෙනුවට හීලිගේ භාවිතය ධනපති ජාතිකවාදී නායකයන් සමගත්  බ්‍රිතාන්‍යයේ වෘත්තීය සමිති හා ලේබර් පක්ෂ ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණවාදීන් සමගත් ප්‍රතිපත්ති විරහිත සබඳතා වර්ධනය කර ගැනීමට මුළු මනින්ම යෙදවුනි. 

ඔහුගේ පෞද්ගලික ජීවන රටාව ඊට සම්පාතික පරිහාණියකට භාජනය විය. 

වරෙකදී තමන් සටන් කළා වූ මූළධර්මයන් අතහැර දමන්නා වූත් ජාතික ශාඛාවන් ගොඩ නැගීමේ දී හජජාකට යටත් වීම ප්‍රතික්ශේප කරන්නාවූත් හීලි වැනි අය නොවැලැක්විය හැකි ලෙසම පංති සතුරාගේ පීඩනය යටතේ පිරිහෙන්නෝය.

මෙම ඓතිහාසික නීතියට නතු නොවන්නෙකු නැත. 

හජජාක යළි තහවරු කරන්නේ කවර නායකයෙකු වත් කම්කරු පන්තියේ ඓතිහාසික අවශ්‍යතාවයන්ට ඉහළින් පිහිටනු නැති බවයි. 

(අවධාරන අපෙනි)

ජී. හීලි නෙරපා හරී: හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුවේ (හජජාක) යෝජනාව – 1985 නොවැම්බර් 01 Read More »

Commemoration

කටුවන සමූලඝාතනය: වසර 36ක බිය ගැන්වීම්වලින් සහ අඛණ්ඩ දණ්ඩමුක්තියකින් පසු ඥාතීහු වින්දිතයන් අනුස්මරණය කරති

අපගේ වාර්තාකරු විසිනි.

මෙම ලිපිය ඉංග්‍රීසි බසින් 2025 සැප්තැම්බර් 05 දින thesocialist.lk හි පල විය. 

Commemoration
කටුවන සමූලඝාතනයේ වින්දිතයන් – දකුණේ සිට: සිසිලියානා, එඩ්වින්, නිල්මිණි, මතගලතා, සුජිතසීලි, චන්ද්‍රලේකා සහ නිරංජලා. 1990 දී ඝාතනය වූ චූලානන්ද, වමේ සිට මුලින්ම.

අගෝස්තු 27 වන දින, හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ කටුවන දී, 1989 අගෝස්තු මාසයේ දී ශ්‍රී ලංකා හමුදාව විසින් සමූලඝාතනය කරන ලද පවුලේ සාමාජිකයින් හත් දෙනාගේ ඥාතීන් විසින් ඔවුන්ව බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරයට ලක් කරන ලද එම ස්ථානයේම, තම ආදරණීයයන් සැමරීමේ අවස්ථාවක් පවත්වන ලදී. වසර 36ක් අපරාධකරුවන්ට ලැබුනු දණ්ඩමුක්ති‍යකින් සහ වින්දිතයින්ගේ ඥාතීන්ට එරෙහි පීඩනයෙන් පසු රාජ්‍ය භීෂණයට ගොදුරු වූ මෙම වින්දිතයන් අනුස්මරණය කරමින් සැමරුම් උත්සවයක් පැවැත්වූ පළමු අවස්ථාව මෙය විය. theSocialist.lk වාර්තාකරුවෝ මෙම අවස්ථාවට එක් වූහ.

දශක තුනහමාරකට සහ තවත් වසරකට පෙර,  ඒ මාරක රාත්‍රියේදී, ශ්‍රී ලංකා හමුදාවේ සිංහ රෙජිමේන්තුවේ  6 වැනි බලඇණිය එම පවුලේ නිවස ආක්‍රමණය කළේය. එම අවස්ථාවේ නිවසේ සිටි එකම පිරිමියා වූයේ සිංහල පාරම්පරික වෛද්‍යවරයෙක් වූ 63 හැවිරිදි  ජේ.එච්.ඒ. එඩ්වින් පියා ය. අනෙක් අය වූයේ 53 හැවිරිදි මව වන එච්.ඒ. සිසිලියානා, තරුණ දියණියන් තිදෙනා වූ, ජේ.එච්.ඒ. නිල්මිණි අශෝකා (25), ජේ.එච්.ඒ. මතඟලතා (20), ජේ.එච්.ඒ. සුජිතසීලි (15), ඥාති දියණියක් වූ ඩබ්ලිව්.ඒ.චන්ද්‍රලේකා (24) සහ 6 හැවිරිදි මිනිබිරිය වූ එන්.ඒ.නිරංජලා විල්සන්ය. සියල්ලෝම සිංහල වාර්ගිකයෝ වූහ. හමුදාව ඔවුන් සියල්ලන්ම එම ස්ථානයේදීම මරා දැමුවේය, නැතහොත් (පසුව මරා දැමූනු ලැබූ) සමහර සාක්ෂිකරුවන්ට අනුව, තරුණ ගැහැණු ළමයින් හතරදෙනා හමුදා කඳවුරට ගෙන ගොස් දින තුනක් දූෂණය කර මරා දමන ලදී. නිවසට බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල වූ අතර නිවස සමඟ පවුලම දවා ලනු ලැබූහ.

ඥාතීන් තම ආදරණීයයන්ගේ පින්තූර ප්‍රදර්ශනය කර ඉටිපන්දම් දැල් වූහ. දිවි ගලවා ගත් දියණියන් දෙදෙනෙක්, ඔවුන්ගේ ස්වාමිපුරුෂයන්, මුණුබුරන් සහ ඔවුන්ගේ පවුල් සහ මිතුරන් විනාඩි කිහිපයක නිශ්ශබ්දතාවයක් පැවැත් වූහ. දශක ගණනාවකට පසුවත් ඔවුන්ගේ කඳුළු වියළී නොතිබුණි. එඩ්වින්ගේ මුණුබුරෙකු වන විමුක්ති මෙසේ සභාව ඇමතීය: 

දිගු වසර 36 ක් තිස්සේ, ඔවුන්ගේ මතකය සැමරීම සඳහා අපට මෙම ඓතිහාසික අවස්ථාව උදා කර ගැනීමට නොහැකි විය. අපට මෙහි පැමිණීමට, ඔවුන්ගේ නම් හඬ ගා කීමට සහ විවෘතව ශෝකය පල කිරීමට අපට නොහැකි විය. භීෂණ තත්ත්වය, මර්දනයේ වාතාවරණය සහ සත්‍යය සහ යුක්තිය සොයන මිනිසුන්ට එරෙහිව අඛණ්ඩව පැවති තර්ජනය අප වැනි පවුල් නිහඬ කළේය. නමුත් නිහඬතාවය යනු අමතක කිරීම නොවේ. මේ වසර ගණනාව අපගේ ශෝකය ගැඹුරු කර ඇති අතර අපගේ අධිෂ්ඨානය ශක්තිමත් කර ඇත.

අද අපි ඒ නිහඬතාවය බිඳ දමමු…ඒවා ක්‍රියාත්මක කළ හමුදාව, ඝාතක කණ්ඩායම් සහ පොලිසියේ සිට ඒවා මෙහෙයවූ දේශපාලන අධිකාරියේ අය දක්වා, නීතිය ඉදිරියේ නොවේ නම්, ඉතිහාසය ඉදිරියේ වගවීමට ලක්කල  යුතුය.

අපේ ඥාතීන්ගේ රුධිරය කෑගසන්නේ පළිගැනීම සඳහා නොව සත්‍යය හා යුක්තිය සඳහා ය. මෙම ජීවිත වැදගත් බවත්, දුප්පතුන්, ගම්වැසියන්, එම වසරවල මරා දැමූ අහිංසක මිනිසුන්, ගැහැනුන් සහ තරුණයින්ගේ ජීවිත ගෞරවනීය බව පිළිගැනීම සඳහා එය කෑගසයි.

මෙවැනි අපරාධ නැවත කිසිදා සිදු නොවිය යුතු බවට විරෝධය පළ කිරීමේ ගැඹුරු සලකුණක් ලෙස අපි ඔබේ නම් සහ ඔබට එල්ල කරන ලද කෲරත්වයන් පිලිබද මතකය ඉදිරියට ගෙන යන්නෙමු.

සත්‍යය, යුක්තිය සහ ගෞරවය වෙනුවෙන් සහ රාජ්‍ය මර්දනයට එරෙහිව සටන් කරන සැමට ඔබේ මතකය ධෛර්යය ලබා දෙනු ඇත.”

එඩ්වින් සහ සිසිලියානාගේ එකම පුත්‍රයා වූ ජේ.එච්.ඒ. චූලානන්ද (22)ගේ නම  සඳහන් කරමින්, ඔහු “යුක්තිය සහ සමාජ සමානාත්මතාවය අපේක්ෂා කළ නමුත් යුගයේ ප්‍රතිගාමී දේශපාලන බලවේග විසින් නොමඟ යවන ලද තරුණයෙක්” බවත්, 1990 ඔක්තෝම්බර් මාසයේදී බෙලිඅත්ත පොලිසිය විසින් ඝාතනය කරන ලද බවත් හෙතෙම ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. චූලානන්ද, 1988-1990 කාලය තුල, ෆැසිස්ට් ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණේ සාමාජිකයෙකු වූ බව පැවසේ. කරුනු පැහැදිලි කරන්නේ, ඔහුව අල්ලා ගැනීමට හෝ මරා දැමීමට අපොහොසත් වූ කළ, හමුදාව, පළිගැනීමේ හා ත්‍රස්ත ගැන්වීමේ ක්‍රියාවක් ලෙස, ඔහුගේ මුළු පවුලම සමූලඝාතනය කිරීම සැලසුම් කරන ලද බවයි. 

Katuwana massacre commemoration
කටුවන සමූලඝාතනයට ගොදුරු වූවන්ගේ පවුල්වල සාමාජිකයෝ දණ්ඩමුක්තියේ වසර 36 සනිටුහන් කරමින් තම ආදරණීයයන් අනුස්මරණය කරති.


සාක්ෂි

මරා දැමුනු අයගේ ඥාතීන් සමඟ අපි කතා කළෙමු. එඩ්වින්ගේ වැඩිමහල් දියණිය චාන්දනී (63) වසර ගණනාවක වේදනාව, විඳදරාගැනීම සහ ජීවන අරගලය පිළිබඳ ඇගේ දුක්බර කතාව අප සමඟ මෙසේ පැවසුවාය: 

“මගේ තාත්තට මිනිස්සු කිව්වේ වෙද මහත්තයා කියලා. මිනිස්සු ගොඩක් ඔහුට ආදරේ කළා. ඔහු හරිම අහිංසක, කරුණාවන්ත, අවංක මනුස්සයෙක්. ඔහු අවිද්දෙ හෙමින්,  මුහුන ප්‍රියමනාප හිනාවකින් පිරී තිබුනා, මෘදුව කතා කළා, සරමයි ජාතික ඇඳුමයි ඇඳලා හිටියේ. ඉස්සර පැවිදි වෙලා ආයුර්වේද පොත් ගණනාවක් පළ කරලා තිබුණා. ඔහුගෙන් ඖෂධ ප්‍රතිකාර ලැබූ බොහෝ දෙනෙක් මා හමුවී මගේ පියානන්ගෙන් සහ මවගෙන් ලැබුණු දයානුකම්පිත සහ, බොහෝ විට නොමිලේ වූ ප්‍රතිකාර ගැන මට පැවසූවා.

අපේ පවුල දුවලා හය දෙනෙක්ගෙන් වූ ලොකු පවුලක්, මගේ සහෝදරයා චූලානන්ද එකම පුතා. අපේ පවුලේ ආර්ථිකය යැපුනේ මගේ පියාගේ ආයුර්වේද වෙදකමෙන් ලැබෙන සොච්චම්, නමුත් ස්ථාවර ඉපැයීම් මතයි. අපිට කුඹුරු ඉඩම් සහ අක්කර ගාණක පොල්, කුරුඳු, හා පැඟිරි ඉඩම් තිබුණා; ඒවා තාත්තා වගා කරලා කළමනාකරණය කළා. මගේ පියා ජයගත් නමුත්, ඒ ඉඩම් පිළිබඳ නඩු හබ නිසා ඔහුට මූල්‍යමය වශයෙන් අලාභ වුනා වගේම ඔහුගේ ව්‍යාපාර කඩා වැටුණා.  අපි හැමෝම ජීවත් වුණේ වරිච්චි ගහල මැටි වලින් හදපු ගෙදරක. කොහොම වුණත්, අපි හැමෝටම හොඳට කන්න දෙන්න, අපිට උගන්වන්න, අසරණ අයට උදව් කරන්න මගේ තාත්තාට තවමත් හැකියාව තිබුණා. 

1971 වන විට මගේ පියා ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ (ශ්‍රීලනිප) සහ සිරිමාවෝ බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිනියගේ ප්‍රබල ආධාරකරුවෙක් වුනා. කෙසේ වෙතත්, 1977 වන විට, ඔහු සමඟි පෙරමුණු ආණ්ඩුව එපා වී, අතෘප්තියට පත් වී එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයට ඡන්දය දුන්නා. එහි නායක ජේ.ආර්.ජයවර්ධන “ධර්මිෂ්ඨ සමාජයක්” පොරොන්දු වුණා.  

අපි හැමෝම ගියේ කටුවන මහා විද්‍යාලයට. මගේ මල්ලී හතේ ශ්‍රේණියෙන් පසු අධ්‍යාපන කටයුතු කරගෙන ගියේ නැහැ. ඔහු ඉතා කාරුණික හා සමාජශීලී තරුණයෙක්. ගම්වැසියන්ට බොහෝ උපකාර කළා. ඔහු තම පවුලේ අයට වඩා තම මිතුරන් සහ අසල්වැසියන් ගැන සැලකිලිමත් වුනා. බොහෝ විට ඔහු නිවසේ සිටි කාලයට වඩා වැඩි කාලයක් නිවසින් බැහැරව සිටියා. ඔහුගේ කැපී පෙනෙන හා බුද්ධිමත් ස්වභාවයත්, සිත් ඇදගන්නා පෙනුමත් නිසා ස්වභාවිකවම තරුණයින් ඔහුව ඔවුන්ගේ නායකයා ලෙස සැලකූවා. ඔහුට රැකියාවක් කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය වූ නමුත් ගම හැර යාමට ඔහුට අවශ්‍ය නොවීය. මම හිතන්නේ ඔහු 1987 අගභාගයේ සිටම ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණ සමඟ සම්බන්ධකම් ඇතිකරගෙන තිබුණා. 

මගේ සහෝදරයා ගමේ මැරයන්ගේ සහ පියාගේ හිටපු විරුද්ධවාදීන්ගේ උදහසට ලක්ව සිටියා. වරක් ඔවුන් හෙල්ලයෙන් ඇන ඔහුගේ ජීවිතය නැති කිරීමට පවා උත්සාහ කළා. ඔහු යන්තම් දිවි ගලවා ගත් නමුත් ඔහුගේ මිතුරා තුවාල ලබා මිය ගියා. 

1979 දී මම ගුරුවරයෙක් සමඟ විවාහ වී වෙනම ජීවත් වුණා. මගේ වැඩිමහල් සහෝදරියක් (ඉන්දුමතී) පසුව පොලිස් නිලධාරියෙකු සමඟ විවාහ වී 1989 මුල් භාගයේදී වැලිමඩ පදිංචියට ගියා. අනෙක් සියලුම සහෝදරියන් මගේ දෙමව්පියන් සමග මහගෙදර ජීවත් වුනා. බාලමයාට වැඩිමල් නංගී ‘ලොකු’ (සුජිතසීලි) සාමාන්‍ය පෙළ (සා/පෙ) විභාගයටත්, ‘හිච්චි’ (මතඟලතා) උසස් පෙළ (උ/පෙ) විභාගයටත් ඉගෙන ගනිමින් සිටියා. නීලා (නිල්මිණි) උසස් පෙළින් පසුව රැකියාවක් බලාපොරොත්තුවෙන් වෘත්තීය පුහුණු පාඨමාලාවලට සහභාගි වෙමින් සිටියා.

1989 අගෝස්තු මාසේ ඉස්කෝලේ නිවාඩු කාලේ මගේ වැඩිමල් නංගිලා දෙන්නා [නිල්මිණි සහ මතඟලතා] අපිව බලන්න වලස්මුල්ලේ [කටුවන සිට කිලෝමීටර් 17ක්] අපේ ගෙදරට ආවා. අපගේ මහගෙදර පිහිටා තිබුණෙ කටුවන ගොවි ජන සේවා මධ්‍යස්ථානය පරිශ්‍රයේ පිහිටි යුධ හමුදා කඳවුරේ සිට කිලෝමීටර් භාගයක් පමණ දුරින්. මගේ සහෝදරියන් හමුදා කඳවුර පසුකර යද්දී සමහර සොල්දාදුවන්, ‘හා…රවුමක් දාල එන්න’ යි කෑ ගසා  තිබුණා. ඒ අගෝස්තු 26 වැනි දා, සෙනසුරාදා දිනයක්. 

මගේ නංගිලා අපිත් එක්ක දවල්ට කෑවා. ඒක තමයි අපි එකට ගත්ත අන්තිම කෑම වේල. මගේ දරුවන් තිදෙනාම ඔවුන්ගේ ආච්චිලා සීයලා සහ පුංචිලා සමඟ නැවතී සිටීමට බොහෝ කැමැත්තක් දැක්වූවා. ඉතින්, තුන්දෙනාම පුංචිලා එක්ක යන්න කියලා අඬන්න ගත්තා. අන්තිමට මගේ දුව නිරංජලා එයාලා එක්ක ගියා. 

ඉස්කෝලේ නිවාඩුව ඉවර වෙන නිසා අගෝස්තු 29 වෙනිදා උදේ මගේ මහත්තයා [සැමියා] අපේ දුවව ගෙදර එක්කන් එන්න යාළුවෙක් එක්ක කටුවනට ගියා. මගේ මහත්තයා බෝම්බ දැමූ නිවස දුටුවා; මිනිස් මාංශ සහ හිස් කබලක් පිළිස්සෙනු ඔහු දුටුවා. මගේ දරුවා ඇතුළු කිසිවෙක් ජීවතුන් අතර සිටියේ නැහැ.  

සිද්ධියෙන් පසු මම වලස්මුල්ල පොලිසියට පැමිණිල්ලක් කිරීමට ගියේ ඒ වන විට කටුවන ප්‍රදේශයේ පොලිසියක් නොතිබූ බැවිනි. පොලිසිය මගේ පැමිණිල්ල සටහන් කර ගැනීම ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කළා. ස්ථානාධිපති (OIC), කේ.එම්. ප්‍රේමතිලක එයාගේ පිස්තෝලය මගේ කටට තියලා, ‘උඹ ගෑණි, කට වහගෙන හිටපං. අවි ගත්තෝ අවියෙන් නසිති,’ කියලා කෑ ගැහුවා.

හරියටම මගේ 28 වැනි උපන්දිනය දවසේ, 1990 ඔක්තෝබර් 22 වැනිදා, බෙලිඅත්ත පොලිසියෙන් මගේ මල්ලී ඝාතනය කළා කියලා සිල්වා කියල කෙනෙක්ගෙන් මගේ මහත්තයාට තොරතුරක් ලැබුණා. මගේ මල්ලීට වෙඩි තැබූ බෙලිඅත්ත පොලිසියේ ස්ථානාධිපති දසනායක මෙම ඝාතනය පිළිබඳව ඉක්මනින්ම පළාත් සභා මන්ත්‍රී කේ. ධනපාලට දන්වා තියෙනවා. ධනපාල [ඔහු අවුරුදු කිහිපයකට පෙර මිය ගියේය] මගේ සහෝදරයාගෙන් ඔහුගේ ජීවිතයට තර්ජනයක් වේ යැයි බිය විය; නමුත් එය කිසි විටෙකත් එසේ නොවීය. ධනපාල තෘප්තිමත් කරවන්න දේහය ඔහුට පෙන්වූ පසු පොලීසිය මල්ලීගේ සිරුර ටයර් සෑයක් මත  පුලුස්සා තිබුණා.

ධනපාලටත් බොහෝ කලකට පෙර මගේ පියා සමඟ ඉඩම් ආරවුලක් තිබුනා. ඔහු මගේ පියාට එරෙහිව පවරා තිබූ නඩුවක් පැරදුණා. ධනපාල සහ අප අතර කුල භේදයක්ද  තිබුනා. මගේ පියාත්, ගමේ ඒ මුළු කොටසම පාහේත් ධනපාලගේ කුලයට වඩා උසස් කුලයකට අයත් වූවක්. ගමේ විවිධ කුලවලට අයත් මිනිසුන් ජීවත් වුනේ ‘මණ්ඩි’ [පොකුරු] හැටියට.”

චාන්දනීගේ ස්වාමිපුරුෂයා වන චමල් (69) සිය කම්පන සහගත අත්දැකීම් මෙසේ හෙලි  කළේය:

“අගෝස්තු 29 වෙනිදා උදේ මම මගේ යාළුවෙක් එක්ක එයාගේ කාර් එකේ දුවව ගෙදර එක්කන් එන්න කටුවනට ගියා. මගේ යාළුවාට ඕන වුණා ධනපාල මන්ත්‍රීව හම්බවෙලා එයාගේ අයියගෙ පුතාව වලස්මුල්ල යුද හමුදා කඳවුරෙන් නිදහස් කර ගන්න උදව්වක් ඉල්ලන්න. කටුවන යුද හමුදා කඳවුරේ මාර්ග බාධකය ළඟ හමුදාව අපේ කාර් එක නතර කළා. මගේ යාළුවා කිව්වා අපි මන්ත්‍රී තුමා හම්බ වෙන්න යනවා කියලා. ඒනිසා, අපිට යන්න දුන්නා.

අපි නිවස පිහිටි ස්ථානයට ළඟා වූ විට මට නිවස  දකින්නට ලැබුනේ නැහැ. මට පෙනුනේ දුම විතරයි. මම ළඟට ගියා. මට මගේ ඇස් අදහා ගන්න බැරි  උනා. නිවස කඩා විනාශ කර දමා සියල්ල ගිනිබත්  වෙමින් පැවතියා. ප්‍රධාන දොරට කිට්ටුව ගේ ඇතුලේ මිනිස් මාංශ පිච්චෙනවා මම දැක්කා. හිස් කබලක් පිච්චෙනවා මම දැක්කා. මට හිටගෙන ඉන්න බැරි වුණා. ගමේ එක්කෙනෙක් දෙන්නෙක් ඇවිත් මාව තදින් අල්ලගත්තා. මගේ නැන්දම්මාගේ සහෝදරියක් මා ළඟට ඇවිත් ‘කවුරුත් ජීවතුන් අතර නැහැ. හැමෝම පිච්චිලා’, කියලා කිව්වා. මම මගේ දුවගේ නම කියමින් කෑගැසුවා. පුංචිඅම්මා මට කිව්වා, ‘මහත්තයා දැන් යන්න. හමුදාව ආවොත් මහත්තයත් මරයි’. ඊට පස්සේ මගේ යාළුවා මාව කාර් එක ඇතුලට තල්ලු කරලා ආපහු ගෙදර ගෙනාවා. මම මගේ බිරිඳට හැමදේම කිව්වා. ඇය පොලොවේ හැපෙමින් වැලපුණා.

සති කිහිපයකට පසු, ධනපාලගේ මුරට හිටපු ග්‍රාම ආරක්ෂකයෙකු වූ [රජයේ සිවිල් ආරක්ෂක බළකායේ සාමාජිකයෙක්] ගාමිණී මට කියා සිටියේ ඔහු සහ තවත් මුරකරුවෙකු අපරාධය කරන විට හමුදාව සමඟ සිටි බවත්, හමුදාවෙන් සියලු දෙනාම මරා දැමූ බවත්, ඒනිසා ඔවුන් ගැන නොසොයන ලෙසත් ය. සහෝදරියන් හතර දෙනා කටුවන හමුදා කඳවුරට ගෙන ගොස් එහි දින තුනක් දූෂණය කර වධ දී මරා දැමූ බව ඔහු මට කීවේය. වැඩි කල් යන්නට මත්තෙන් ඒ මුරකරුවන් දෙදෙනාම ඝාතනය වූ බව මට දැන ගන්නට ලැබුණා.

එම කාලය තුළම අපි පොලිස් ස්ථානවල පැමිණිලි කිරීමට උත්සාහ කළා. ඔවුන් තවමත් කිසියම් රැඳවුම් මධ්‍යස්ථානයක ජීවතුන් අතර සිටින බවට විශ්වාස කළ නිසා අපි හමුදා කඳවුරුවල පවා ඔවුන් සොයමින් සිටියා. මමත් මගේ බිරිඳත් වලස්මුල්ල පොලිසියට පැමිණිල්ලක් කරන්න ගියාම අපිව එලව ගත්තා. මගේ ඥාතීන් ගැන තොරතුරු දැන ගන්න සිංහ රෙජිමේන්තුවේ 6 වැනි බළඇණියේ කපිතාන් පී.එල්.යූ. බුද්ධදාස හමුවීමට වලස්මුල්ල හමුදා කඳවුරට යාමට පවා මම එඩිතර වුණා. ඔහු මට කිව්වා, ‘ඔවුන් ගැන හොයන්න එපා. ඒ අය ඔක්කොම මැරිලා. ඔවුන් වෙනුවෙන් පිනක් දහමක් කරන්න,’ කියලා. මම තංගල්ල සහකාර පොලිස් අධිකාරී කාර්යාලයට (ඒඑස්පී) පැමිණිලි කිරීමට ගිය විට සහකාර පොලිස් අධිකාරී ඒකනායක මට තර්ජනය කරමින්, ‘තමුන් ගුරුවරයෙක්; මැරිච්ච මිනිස්සු ගැන සෙවීමට උත්සාහ කරන්න එපා. එසේ නොවුණහොත් තමුන්ට තමුන්ගේ ජීවිතයත් අහිමි වෙයි’, කියලා කෑ ගැසුවා.

මට මිද්දෙණිය පොලිසියට පැමිණිල්ලක් කරන්න පුළුවන් වුණේ 1994 සැප්තැම්බර් අගදී චන්ද්‍රිකා කුමාරතුංග මැතිනිය ජනාධිපති වුණාට පස්සේ. අතුරුදන් වූවන් පිළිබඳ ජනාධිපති කොමිසමට පැමිණිලි කරන්නත් අපට පුළුවන් වුණා. මුත්තෙට්ටුවේගම කොමිසමේ අවසන් වාර්තාවේ අපේ ඥාතීන් හත් දෙනාගේ නම් තිබෙනවා.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, 1998 න් පසු මෙම නඩුව කිසි දිනක ඉදිරියට ගියේ නැහැ. සමූල ඝාතන භූමියේ සාම්පල එකතු කර වසර හතරක් ගතවී තිබියදී, මෙම නඩුව ක්‍රමානුකූලව වළලන්නට පොලිසිය ධනපාල සමඟ හවුල් වී ඇති බව අපට දැනගන්නට ලැබුණා. 

මටත්, මගේ බිරිඳටත් විඳදරාගැනීමට සිදු වූ දිගුකාලීන මානසික කම්පනය නිසා මට ගුරුවරයෙක් ලෙස මගේ වැඩ කටයුතු අවංකව කරගෙන යාමට නොහැකි වුනා. ඒ නිසා මම අංක 44/90 චක්‍රලේඛය යටතේ විශ්‍රාම යාමට තීරණය කළා. ඊට පස්සේ අපේ පවුලේ තත්ත්වය නරක අතට හැරුණා. දරුවන් හතර දෙනෙකුගෙන් යුත් මගේ පවුලේ පැවැත්ම සඳහා මට අරගල කිරීමට සිදුවුණා.

චන්ද්‍රිකා එල්ටීටීඊය [දෙමළ ඊළාම් විමුක්ති කොටි සංවිධානය] සමඟ යුද්ධය නැවත ආරම්භ කළා. 1998 වන විට ශ්‍රී ලංකා හමුදාව යාපනයේ අහිංසක දෙමළ ජනතාවට කළ අපරාධ ගැන අපට දැනගන්නට ලැබුණා. ක්‍රිෂාන්ති කුමාරස්වාමි සහ ඇගේ පවුලේ අය චෙම්මනිහිදී ඝාතනය කිරීමේ සිද්ධිය අපගේ ආත්මයන් කම්පා කළා. එතකොට අපිට තේරුණා සමහර වෙලාවට අපේ පවුලට කරපු අපරාධවලට වඩා දෙමළ මිනිස්සුන්ට උතුරේ විඳවන්න සිද්ධ වෙන්න ඇති අපරාධවල තරම. පසුව, මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ යුද්ධය දිගටම කරගෙන ගියා; ඔහුගේ සහ ඔහුගෙන් පසු සියලු රජයක්ම කුලී මිනී මරුවන් ‘රණ විරුවන්’ ලෙස වර්ණනා කළා. ඒ මුළු කාලය පුරාම අපව නිහඬ කරනු ලැබුවා.”

එකල ව්‍යාජ “මානව හිමිකම්” සටන් කරුවන් පිලිඹඳ ඔහුගේ අත්දැකීම් ගැන ද ඔහු අපට පැවසීය: 

“මගේ බිරිඳගේ අනාථ වූ බාලම සොහොයුරිය ඒ කාලය තුළ ඉගෙනුම ලබමින් අප සමඟ ජීවත් වූවා. වරක්, 1997 මුල් භාගයේදී, ඇයට රැකියාවක් සොයා දීමට උදව්වක් අපේක්ෂාවෙන් මම ඇය සමඟ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ හමුවීමට ඔහුගේ තංගල්ල කාල්ටන් කාර්යාලයට ගියා. මගේ දෙමව්පියන් ඩී.ඒ. රාජපක්ෂ වෙනුවෙන් වැඩ කළා; තරුණයෙකු ලෙස මම මහින්දගේ මැතිවරණ සඳහා මැතිවරණ ව්‍යාපාරයේ නියැලිලා තිබුණා. ඉතින්, මම ඔහුව පෞද්ගලිකව දැන සිටියා. ඔහුව හමුවීමට බොහෝ වේලාවක් බලා සිටීමෙන් පසු, අපි බලහත්කාරයෙන් ඔහුගේ කාමරයට ඇතුළු වී පවුලේ සමූලඝාතනයෙන් පසු අපගේ දුෂ්කර තත්වය ඔහුට දැනුම් දුන්නා. ඔහු අපට කෑ ගැසුවා: ‘බලන්න, මේ කට්ටිය ජවිපෙට වැඩ කරලා මරෝගෙන, දැන් රැකියා ගන්න මගේ උදව් ඉල්ලගෙන ඇවිත්’. මගේ නෑනා හඬා වටුනා. ඇයට ඔහුගෙන් රැකියාවක් හෝ කිසිදු උදව්වක් ලැබුණේ නැහැ.”

පවුලේ ඉතිරි වූ තවත් වැඩිමල් දියණියක් වන ඉන්දුමතී ප්‍රාදේශීය දේශපාලකයා පවුල කෙරෙහි බැඳගෙන තිබූ ද්වේශය පිළිබඳ සිය අත්දැකීම මෙසේ පැවසුවාය: 

“මගේ තාත්තා 1988 අග සහ 1989 මුල මැතිවරණවලදී එජාපයට සහය දුන් නිසා, මහ මැතිවරණයෙන් පසු, මගේ පියා මා සමඟ ගියා ධනපාල මන්ත්‍රීට කතා කිරීමට. අපේ දෙමවුපියන්ගේ නිවස තිබුණේ ඔහුගේ නිවසට යාර කිහිපයක් දුරින්. ඔහු මුල්කිරිගල ආසනයේ එවකට එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ කැබිනට් අමාත්‍යවරයා වූ ආනන්ද කුලරත්නගේ බාප්පා විය. පසු කාලීනව අපට දැනගන්නට ලැබුණා මගේ සහෝදරයා ඒ කාලේ ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණේ (ජවිපෙ) ක්‍රියාකාරකම්වල පූර්ණ කාලීනව නියැලී සිටි බව.  මැතිවරණවලදී ඡන්දය නොදෙන ලෙස ජවිපෙ නියෝග කර තිබුණා [දකුණු පළාතේ පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය 1988 ජුනි මාසයේදී පැවැත්විණි]. ධනපාල හිතුවෙ ජවිපෙ සහ එහි සන්නද්ධ අංශය වූ දේශප්‍රේමී ජනතා ව්‍යාපාරය (DJV) මගින් ඔහුගේ ජීවිතයට තර්ජනයක් එල්ල වී ඇති බව යි. කෙසේ වෙතත්, ගම්වැසියන් පවසන්නේ මගේ සහෝදරයා ගමේ කිසිවෙකුට, අපේ පවුලට ඊර්ෂ්‍යා කළ අයට පවා, හානියක් කිරීමට කිසිඳු ඉඩක් නොතැබූ බවයි. මට හෝ අපේ පවුලේ වෙනත් කිසිවෙකුට රැකියා සොයා දීම ධනපාල දැඩි ලෙස ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කළා. ‘ඔය ගෙදර ත්‍රස්තවාදියෙක් ඉන්නවා. වෙද මහත්තයා සිටියේ නැත්නම්, මෙලහකටත් ඔය ගෙදර තමුසෙලත් එක්කම අලුවෙලා ඉවරයි,’ කියල ඔහු කෑ ගැසුවා.

නමුත්, මගේ දෙමවුපියන් හෝ කිසිවකු ළඟදීම නියමිත සමූල ඝාතනයක් ගැන සිහිනෙන්වත් නොසිතුවේ, එවැනි සිදුවීම් අප මීට පෙර අසා නොතිබූ නිසයි. 

අපේ නිවසට බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල කිරීමට දින දෙකකට පමණ පෙර මගේ වැඩිමහල් සහෝදරිය, නීලා මට ලිපියක් එවා  කියා තිබුණේ, පෙරේදා එම ප්‍රදේශයේ හමුදාව ඉලක්ක කර බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල වූ බවත්, එයින් සෙබළුන් කිහිප දෙනෙකු මිය ගිය බවත්ය. මගේ සහෝදරිය ලියල තිබුනා දැන් ඔවුන්ට ඔවුන්ගේ ජීවිතත් අනතුරේ කියලා දැනෙනවා කියලා. මම හිතන්නේ ඒ ලියුම තැපෑලට දාපු දවසෙ තමයි එයායි හිච්චියි අපේ ලොකු අක්කාව බලන්න වලස්මුල්ලේ එයාගේ ගෙදරට ගිහින්  තියෙන්නෙ. ඒ ලියුම එවනකොට අපේ හීං නංගී [සුනීතා] මාත් එක්ක මගේ ගෙදර හිටියා. ඒ නිසා ඇගේ ජීවිතය බේරුණා.”

දිවි ගලවා ගත් බාලම දියණිය සහ දැන් ගුරුවරියක් වන සුනීතා තම ආදරණීය දෙමාපියන්, තම සහෝදරයා සහ හමුදාවෙන් එල්ල වූ හිරිහැර ගැන කඳුළු සලමින් සිහිපත් කළාය:

“මගේ පියා බෝධිසත්වයෙක්. රටේ විවිධ ප්‍රදේශවල මිනිසුන් විසින් සොයනු ලැබූ දක්ෂ වෛද්‍යවරයෙකු ලෙස, සර්ප දෂ්ට කිරීම්වලින් පසු ගෙන එන ලද බොහෝ රෝගීන්ගේ ජීවිත ඔහු කොතරම් ආශ්චර්යමත් ලෙස බේරා ගත්තාද යන්න මම දුටුවා. විවිධ අනතුරු හේතුවෙන් සිදු වූ අත් පා කැඩීම් බ්ඳීම් ඔහු දක්ෂ ලෙස සුව කළ ආකාරය ද මම දුටුවා. මගේ මව මගේ පියාට පරිපූර්ණ ගැළපුමක්. දේවතාවියක් මෙන්, ඇය රෝගීන්ට ප්‍රතිකාර කිරීම සඳහා දිවා රෑ කැපවී සිටියා. 

අපේ තාත්තා වෙද ග්‍රන්ථ කිහිපයක් ලියා පළ කර තිබුණා. ඒවා ලියා ඇත්තේ කවි පද ස්වරූපයෙන්. සර්ප විෂ සංහාරය I සහ II, හා බිලිඳු රෝග සංහාරය ඉතා ජනප්‍රිය වූ අතර මන්ත්‍ර ශතකය තවමත් පොත් සාප්පු වල අලෙවි වන පොතක්.

ඔහු කිසිවිටෙක කිසිවෙකුට, කෘමියෙකුටවත් හානියක් කළේ නෑ. එවැනි තේජසකින් යුත් මිනිසෙකුට ගිනි අවියක් එල්ල කර ඔහුව මරා දැමීමට යමෙකු කෙතරම් කුරිරු විය යුතු දැයි මට තේරුම් ගත නොහැකියි. මේ ලෝකය ශාප ලත් වේ!

අයියා හරිම කඩවසම් කෙනෙක්. ඔහු සෑම විටම අන් අයට උපකාර කළ අතර සහානුකම්පාවෙන් යුක්තව සිටියා. ඔහු ගමේ තරුණයන්ට නායකයෙක් වුනා. සමහර විට ගමේ තරුණයන් ඔහුව පාවා දුන්නේ ඔහු කළ වරදක් නිසා නොව කුඩා ආරවුල් සහ රණ්ඩු සරුවල්වලට අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් විට තමුන්ට බේරීමට යි.

අපේ පවුල ඝාතනයට මාස දහයකට පමණ පෙර කටුවන යුද හමුදා කඳවුරේ ප්‍රධානියා අනෙක් සොල්දාදුවන් සමඟ අපේ පැරණි නිවසට පැමිණ එදින රාත්‍රී 7.00 ට අපේ නිවස ගිනිබත් කිරීමට යන බැවින් අවශ්‍ය සියලුම බඩු බාහිරාදිය ඉවත් කර  ගන්නා  ලෙස තාත්තාට කියා සිටියා. “අපට හිංසා කරන්න එපා, මගේ පුතා වරදක් කර ඇත්නම් ඔහුට දඬුවම් කරන්න” යි කියා මගේ පියා ඔහුගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටියා. ඒත් ඔවුන් අපේ ගෙදරට ගිනි තිබ්බා. සමූල ඝාතනය වන විට අපේ පවුල පදිංචිව සිටි රුක්මල්පිටිය පාර අයිනේ තිබූ නිවස එම මාර්ගයේම තිබූ පැරණි නිවසට මීටර් සියයක් පමණ දුරින් පසුව ඉදිකරන ලද්දක්.

මට මතකයි රාජ්‍ය ත්‍රස්තවාදය පැවැති කාලයේ හමුදාව නිතරම අපේ ගෙදරට රිංගලා ඇතුලේ හැමතැනම සෝදිසි කළා. අපි නිතරම භීතියට පත් වුණා. ඒ අය හොඳටම දැනගෙන හිටියා මගේ අයියා ගෙදර නැති බවත්, අපේ වයසක අම්මා තාත්තා සහ අපි ගෑනු ළමයි විතරයි එතන හිටියේ කියලා. ඒ අය අපෙන් අයියා ගැන ප්‍රශ්න කරලා පොත්පත් පවා හෙව්වා. සමහර වෙලාවට අපි නිදාගෙන ඉද්දි රෑ මැදියමේ පවා ඒ අය කඩා වැදුනා. ඉන් පස්සෙ භූමිතෙල් ලාම්පු නිවන්න කියලා,  එහේ මෙහේ  හොයනවා.”

ක්‍රමානුකූල ඝාතන රැල්ලක් 

දකුණේ සහ උතුරේ, ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ පාලක ප්‍රභූව, ධනේශ්වර පාලනයට දේශපාලන දක්ෂිනාංශයෙන් එල්ල විය හැකි තර්ජනය  තුරන් කිරීමට හා, සියල්ලටත් වඩා, අහිංසක ග්‍රාමීය දුප්පතුන්ට හා පීඩිතයන්ට එරෙහිව, මිලිටරිය සහ පොලිසිය, ඝාතක කල්ලි, ත්‍රස්තවාදය වැලැක්වීමේ පනත සහ හදිසි අවස්ථා රෙගුලාසි යන රාජ්‍යයේ සම්පූර්ණ යාන්ත්‍රණය දිගේලි කළේය. එම කාලපරිච්ඡේදය තුළ සිදු වූ මහා පරිමාණ අතුරුදන්වීම්වලට හේතු සූත්‍රගත කරමින්, 1997 දෙසැම්බර් මස ආසියානු මානව හිමිකම් කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව (AHRC) මෙසේ ප්‍රකාශ කළේය:

 “හදිසි අවස්ථා රෙගුලාසි යටතේ, නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන නිලධාරීන්ට තිබූ සියලු සීමාවන් ඉවත් කරන ලද අතර, මළ සිරුරු බැහැර කිරීමේ බලය මෙම නිලධාරීන්ගේ තනි අභිමතයට පවරන ලදී. අධිකරණ අධීක්ෂණය අත්හිටුවන ලදී. බැහැර කරන ලද සිරුරු පිළිබඳ වාර්තා තබා ගැනීමට පවා ප්‍රතිපාදන නොතිබුණි.”

එම වාර්තාවේ වැඩිදුරටත් මෙසේද සඳහන් විය:

“අතුරුදහන් කිරීම් ඉතා හිතාමතාම සැලසුම් කළ ප්‍රතිපත්තියක ප්‍රතිඵලයක් වූ අතර සැලැස්මකට අනුව ඉතා සූක්ෂම ලෙස ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන ලදී. නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන නිලධාරීන්ට අත්අඩංගුවට ගැනීමට, මරා දැමීමට සහ මළ සිරුරු බැහැර කිරීමට උපදෙස් ලැබුණි. හදිසි අවස්ථා රෙගුලාසි පැනවීමෙන් මෙය නීත්‍යානුකූලව කළ හැකි විය. ඝාතන සිදු කිරීමට පොලිසියට නිරන්තරයෙන් පුහුණුව ලබා දුන් අතර, එක් එක් ප්‍රදේශයේ කොපමණ සංඛ්‍යාවක් මරා දැමිය යුතුද යන්න අධීක්ෂණය කිරීමේ ක්‍රම තිබුණි. ඝාතක කණ්ඩායම් සඳහා මුදල් බෙදා හැරීම හරහා දිරි දීමනා ලබා දෙන ලදී. 

එවැනි ක්‍රියාකාරකම්වලට සහභාගී වීමට හිතකර මනෝභාවයකින් තබා ගැනීම සඳහා මෙම කණ්ඩායම්වලට මත්පැන් ද ලබා දෙන ලදී. මරා දැමීමට නියමිත අයගේ ලැයිස්තු බෙදා හරින ලදී. ප්‍රශ්න කිරීම සඳහා විශේෂ ස්ථානවල විශේෂ ප්‍රශ්න කිරීම් පවත්වන ලදී. බොහෝ අවස්ථාවන්හිදී, මෙම ප්‍රශ්න කිරීම් අතරතුර මරා දැමීමට තීරණය කරන ලද අතර, මෙම ස්ථානවල රහසිගත වටපිටාව තුළ මිනිසුන් ඝාතනය කරන ලදී. නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන නිලධාරීන් මෙම ක්‍රියාකාරකම් සිදු කිරීමේදී නීති විරෝධී කන්ඩායම් සමඟ මිශ්‍ර විය. දේශපාලනඥයින්ගේ අභිමතයන් ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට හැකි වන පරිදි මෙම කණ්ඩායම් වෙත දේශපාලනඥයින්ට සෘජු ප්‍රවේශය ලබා දෙන ලදී.”

කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව සහ වළ දැමූ ලැයිස්තු

1988 ජනවාරි 1 න් පසු පුද්ගලයන් බලහත්කාරයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීම හෝ අතුරුදන් කිරීම් පිළිබඳ සිද්ධීන් විමර්ශනය කිරීම සඳහා 1994 නොවැම්බරයේදී ජනාධිපති කුමාරතුංග විසින් ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභා තුනක් පත් කරන ලදී. මනෝරි මුත්තෙටුවේගමගේ සභාපතිත්වයෙන් යුත් කොමිසම බස්නාහිර, දකුණ සහ සබරගමුව පළාත්වල සිදුවීම් පිළිබඳව සොයා බලන ලදී.

එවකට කටුවන යුද හමුදා කඳවුරට අනුයුක්තව සිටි නිලධාරීන් පිළිබඳ තොරතුරු ලබා දෙන ලෙස කොමිෂන් සභාව කළ ඉල්ලීමට ප්‍රතිචාර වශයෙන් 1997 ජුනි 30 වැනි දින යුද හමුදාව ඔවුන්ගේ වාර්තාවල ‘සඳහන්ව නොමැත’ යනුවෙන් පිළිතුරු දුන්නේය. මෙය අනෙක් බොහෝ කඳවුරු සම්බන්ඳයෙන් ප්‍රතිචාර වශයෙන් ලබා දුන් පිළිතුරම විය. එම තොරතුරු හමුදාවෙන් ලබා ගැනීමට කොමිසම වැඩිදුර පියවර ගත්තේ නැත.

මෙම අපරාධ සිදු කළ බව කියන අපරාධකරුවන් කොමිසමේ නිර්දේශවලින්ම ආරක්ෂා විය. කොමිසම “සාක්ෂිකරුවන්ගේ චෝදනාවලට පදනම් වූ තොරතුරු සහ කරුණු මූලික වශයෙන් විශ්වාස කළ හැකි” බව සොයා ගත් නමුත්, එය එසේ වුවද, වැඩිදුර විමර්ශන සිදු කරන තුරු, “අප විසින් වෙනම ආවරණයක් යටතේ එවනු ලබන බලහත්කාරයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීම් හෝ අතුරුදහන් කිරීම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් වගකිව යුතු යැයි චෝදනා ලබන පුද්ගලයන්ගේ නම් ලැයිස්තු ප්‍රකාශයට පත් නොකරන ලෙස අපි නිර්දේශ කරමු,” යි කියා සිටියේය. කුමාරතුංගගේ ආන්ඩුව හෝ අනුප්‍රාප්තික ආන්ඩු විසින් එවැනි “වැඩිදුර විමර්ශන” කිසිවිටෙක සිදු නොකළ අතර, එමගින් අපරාධකරුවන්ට ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වා දණ්ඩමුක්තිය සහ වැඩිදුර අපරාධ කිරීම සඳහා ආරක්ෂාව ලබා දුන්නේය. අද දක්වාම, මෙම රහස්‍ය ලැයිස්තු සහ සාක්ෂිකරුවන්ගේ සාක්ෂි මහජනතාවට අනාවරණය කර නොමැත.

ධනේශ්වර ඒකීය රාජ්‍යය සහ මූල්‍ය ප්‍රාග්ධනයේ අවශ්‍යතා ආරක්ෂා කිරීම සඳහා පසුව උතුරේ සහ නැගෙනහිර ජනවාර්ගික දෙමළ ජනතාවට එරෙහිව ඉදිරියට ගෙන ගිය දකුණේ ප්‍රතිකැරැල්ල සමයේ ක්‍රියාත්මක කළ ආන්ඩුවේ මර්දන ප්‍රතිපත්තිවල පන්ති ස්වභාවය theSocialist.lk පෙන්වා දී ඇත

පරපෝෂිත රාජ්‍යය, එහි මිලිටරිය, පොලිසිය, නීති සහ ධනේශ්වර පන්ති පාලනය අහෝසි කිරීමෙන් තොරව ධනේශ්වර රාජ්‍යයේ මෙම කුරිරුකම් වැළැක්විය නොහැකි අතර යුක්තිය ස්ථාපිත කළ නොහැක. සමාජවාදී ප්‍රතිපත්ති සඳහා දකුනු ආසියාතික හා ජාත්‍යන්තර කම්කරු පන්තියේ ඒකාබද්ධ අරගලයේ කොටසක් ලෙස සුලු ධනේශ්වරය සහ පීඩිත ජනතාව තම පිටුපස පෙළගස්වා ගනිමින් මේ සඳහා සටන් කිරීම කම්කරු පන්තියේ ඓතිහාසික කර්තව්‍යය යි.

කටුවන සමූලඝාතනය: වසර 36ක බිය ගැන්වීම්වලින් සහ අඛණ්ඩ දණ්ඩමුක්තියකින් පසු ඥාතීහු වින්දිතයන් අනුස්මරණය කරති Read More »

T

The Socialist Equality Party is established in Turkey as a section of the International Committee of the Fourth International

Statement of the International Committee of the Fourth International

Reposted below is the ICFI Statement published in the World Socialist Web Site on 13 August 2025.

The International Committee of the Fourth International welcomes with pride and enthusiasm the establishment of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International) as the Turkish section of the World Party of Socialist Revolution.

The formation of the section of the ICFI in Turkey is an event of immense historical significance. Although it was on the island of Büyükada (Prinkipo) in 1933 that the call for the building of the Fourth International was issued, the establishment of the SEP marks the first time that a party has been formed in Turkey based on the internationalist program and principles of Trotskyism.

The establishment of the Turkish section is the outcome of an intense and systematic process of theoretical, historical and political clarification. The foundations for the formation of a Trotskyist party in Turkey were laid by the late comrade Halil Celik, who initiated political discussions with the International Committee. Halil’s contact with the ICFI and his commitment to building its Turkish section resulted from his conclusion, drawn from years of painful experience with various forms of Pabloite opportunism, that relentless political struggle against these tendencies was necessary.

In 2014 the ICFI formally endorsed the efforts of comrade Halil, who had begun the education of a group of young socialists in the history of the Fourth International, to establish a section in Turkey. In 2018 the Sosyalist Eşitlik Grubu (Socialist Equality Group) was formed. 

Celia
Halil Celik (1961-2018)

Halil undertook the translation of major publications of the International Committee into Turkish. He wrote: 

In a country where the working class and socialist movement in general have been dominated by Stalinism, Maoism and petty-bourgeois nationalist tendencies for decades, these books are of prime importance in developing socialist consciousness among workers and youth. Publications of the contemporary Marxist literature produced by the world Trotskyist movement in Turkish, we believe, will contribute to laying the theoretical and political foundation for the building of the Turkish section of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI).

Despite his untimely death on December 31, 2018, Halil had by then recruited and educated a cadre of Sosyalist Eşitlik Grubu that was determined to carry forward the fight for Trotskyism. 

In June 2022 the SEG submitted its application to join the ICFI. The resolution motivating the application stated: 

The building of a revolutionary party in any country is possible only on the basis of an international perspective, program and party. The only solution to the major problems in Turkey, which is in a critical position in terms of global geopolitics and class struggle, is the international socialist revolution. The founding of the SEP (Turkey) will be an expression of the global expansion of the ICFI, the only political tendency that assumes the task of solving the great historical problems.

The International Committee accepted the application of the SEG. This posed before the Turkish comrades the challenge of elaborating the historical foundations and principles of the new section. As there had never been a Trotskyist party in Turkey, this required the most exacting political work. It demanded not only a thorough assimilation of the history of the Fourth International, but also an analysis and explanation of the complex political and strategic issues that confront the Trotskyist movement in Turkey. 

While pursuing this theoretical work, contributing significantly to the editorial work of the World Socialist Web Site, and continuing their ambitious program of publishing critical works of the International Committee, the SEG undertook important political initiatives to expand the political presence of the ICFI. Of particular importance was the SEG’s organization, beginning in 2023, of annual meetings on the island of Büyükada to commemorate the life and work of Leon Trotsky.

In April 2025 the International Committee voted to approve the transformation of the SEG into the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi and its recognition as a section of the World Party of Socialist Revolution. This vote was taken following a careful review of the organization’s document, The Historical and International Foundations of the Socialist Equality Party (Turkey). 

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal held its founding congress in Istanbul on June 13-15, 2025. In addition to the historical document, the SEP also adopted a Statement of Principles and a constitution. In accordance with Turkish law, the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal was obligated to apply in Ankara for formal recognition as a party by the state. The official certification was received in August. 

In a video statement announcing the formation of the SEP, posted on the World Socialist Web Site, its national chairman Ulaş Sevinç states:

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi is unlike other political parties. We are part of the World Party of Socialist Revolution. We reject all forms of nationalism and fight for the international unity of workers, who have common interests and enemies worldwide. We reject petty-bourgeois identity politics, recognizing that the fundamental division in society is class-based.

All fundamental problems facing humanity are global problems stemming from the capitalist system. Since one cause of these problems is private ownership of the means of production and another is the division of the world into economically obsolete nation states, the solutions must also be international. The working class, as an international class, is the only social force capable of implementing these solutions. Rather than pursuing a “multipolar” capitalist world, the alternative to the nation-state system that leads to imperialist war and genocide is a federation of world workers’ states that will eliminate borders.

The ongoing genocide in Gaza is the most striking manifestation of the barbarism of the capitalist system and the decay of all parties defending it. As with other critical issues, it has become clear that the Palestinian question cannot be solved within the existing capitalist nation-state system. The same applies to the Kurdish question, which is an international issue. The only valid, progressive solution to these questions is a Socialist Federation of the Middle East, which will be established through the revolutionary mobilization of workers of all nationalities.

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi unequivocally rejects the “lesser evil” policy and fights for the political independence of the working class. This means rejecting class-collaborationist “popular front” politics, which subordinate the working class to bourgeois parties and interests.

Regardless of their differences, all capitalist parties are in complete agreement on two fundamental issues: allegiance to imperialism and hostility toward the interests of the working class. For this reason, by their very nature, they cannot resolve any fundamental political issues, including the Kurdish question. They cannot establish a democratic regime, ensure social equality, or pursue an anti-imperialist foreign policy. As Leon Trotsky explained in his theory of permanent revolution, these tasks fall to the working class in the struggle for socialism. That is, the struggle for democracy is inextricably linked to the struggle for socialism.

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi rejects the capitalist establishment parties and the pseudo-left parties that claim there is no alternative to collaborating with them. We call on workers and youth to build the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi as their own revolutionary party.

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi is a “party of history.” Our party stands in the tradition of classical Marxism of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Trotsky, as well as the tradition of the October Revolution of 1917. Since its founding in 1923, the Trotskyist movement has defended and developed this tradition against Stalinism, whose “national socialism” betrayed the revolution in the interests of the Kremlin bureaucracy’s “peaceful coexistence” with imperialism that led to the collapse of the USSR; against Social Democracy, whose reactionary program of reforming capitalism has failed; and against petty-bourgeois nationalism, which results inevitably in capitulation to imperialism and defeat.

The aim of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi and the International Committee of the Fourth International, with which it is in political solidarity, is summed up in the following statement of Trotsky, founder of the Fourth International: “… the full material and spiritual liberation of the toilers and exploited through the socialist revolution.”

Join us in this struggle that determines the fate of all humanity. Visit sosyalistesitlikpartisi.org, review our documents, and join the party!

The foundation of the Socialist Equality Party in Turkey extends the work of the Trotskyist movement into a country that stands at a key strategic juncture of not only global geopolitics but also of the international class struggle. The massively powerful multi-national proletariat of Turkey is destined to play a gigantic role in the global struggle against capitalism and imperialism. 

Moreover, the raising of the banner of Permanent Revolution by our comrades in Turkey will inspire a new generation of workers and the most principled elements among the youth and intellectuals in the “emerging” countries of the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. The political bankruptcy of the national bourgeoisie—i.e., its subservience to imperialism and inability to satisfy either the democratic aspirations or social interests of the masses—is vindicating every day the insistence of the Fourth International that the future of humanity depends upon the socialist revolution and the transfer of power to the working class.

Long Live the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi!

Long Live the International Committee of the Fourth International!

Forward to the World Socialist Revolution!

Read Statement of Principles of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International)

Read: The Historical and International Foundations of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International)

The Socialist Equality Party is established in Turkey as a section of the International Committee of the Fourth International Read More »

Toronto

Toronto International Film Festival to screen propaganda film for Israel’s genocide in Gaza

By Lee Parsons.

Reposted below is the article of the World Socialist Web Site published on 10 September 2025.

Acting as a cultural arm of Canada’s imperialist ruling elite, the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) will be rolling out the red carpet Wednesday for the world premiere of a film about the events of October 7, 2023 that provides propaganda cover for Israel’s genocide against the Gaza Palestinians.

The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue, from director and producer Barry Avrich, is entirely silent about the Israeli state’s decades of brutal oppression and dispossession of the Palestinian people, and the violence and terror it has inflicted on the residents of Gaza and the West Bank over the past two years. The documentary film’s lens is exclusively focused on the efforts of retired Israeli Major General Noam Tibon to rescue family members caught up in the October 7 Gaza Palestinian uprising against the Zionist regime, which for more than 15 years had subjected them to a brutal and ongoing economic blockade.

Toronto

The film presents Tibon as an heroic figure. While Avrich emphatically—and laughably—claims the film is “non-political,” the not-so-subtly inferred message is that Tibon personifies the “plight” and “courage” of the Israeli people. 

The documentary centers on Tibon’s obstacles in reaching his family, who had come under fire during the attack, when Palestinian fighters entered Kibbutz Nahal Oz, which lies less than one kilometer from the Gaza border. Tibon responded to a text from his son and, as the film’s website breathlessly puts it,

With no time to spare, Noam and his wife, Gali, embarked on a ten-hour mission across a country under siege to save their family… Noam navigated ambushes, roadblocks, and a collapsing security system in a relentless race against time.

The film is described in the synopsis given by TIFF as “a profoundly human story about courage, family, and the power of love in the face of unimaginable terror.”

This is foul Zionist propaganda. The constructed and entirely contrived narrative treats the events of October 7 entirely outside of history—as if they fell from the sky. Its narrative frame conforms to a “T” with that of the Israeli state and its western imperialist backers: the Hamas-led uprising was “unprovoked.” Indeed, Avrich submitted his film to TIFF under the title “Out of Nowhere.” It was the festival organizers, clearly in the interests of obscuring the film’s pro-Zionist line, who persuaded him to rename it The Road Between Us. 

Anyone who has followed the decades-long persecution of the Palestinians by the Israeli regime can only feel outraged by claims that Israel, which has been armed to the teeth by Washington and its allies, was a “country under siege” in October 2023. Since 2006, Israel had effectively maintained Gaza as an “open-air prison,” repeatedly bombing and terrorizing its population, not to mention the systematic seizures of Palestinian land and episodes of mass ethnic cleansing going back to the very formation of Israel in 1948. 

Nor can there be any other legitimate response but hostility to complacent references to “courage” and “family” after almost two years of a non-stop genocidal onslaught by Israel, backed by the imperialist powers, on the Palestinians, whose families have been torn apart, massacred, starved and left destitute. The only “unimaginable terror” is that carried out by the IDF against Gaza’s population.

The attempt by TIFF to wash the blood of the Palestinian people from the IDF by finding a “hero” among its senior ranks could not have served as a better piece of propaganda for the Netanyahu regime if they had paid for it themselves. To tout such a film as a legitimate artwork is as repugnant today as claiming that Leni Riefenstahl’s propaganda efforts were a legitimate expression of life during the Third Reich.

There are many issues a serious documentary about October 7 could have taken up, including interrogating the conditions that caused hundreds of Palestinian fighters to embark effectively on a suicide mission, and the reasons for the alleged and thoroughly unconvincing state of “unpreparedness” of the Israeli military and intelligence.

The Zionist state and military boast about their technological capability and skill at every turn when it serves their ideological and political purposes. But world public opinion is supposed to believe they found themselves entirely blind-sided in October 2023.

Extensive evidence suggests that elements high up in the Zionist regime were aware of the Islamist Hamas’ plans for October 7 well in advance, and chose to ensure that Israel’s security forces stood down to create a pretext for a long-planned onslaught on Gaza to ethnically cleanse its population and seize the tiny enclave, to implement, in fact, the “Final Solution” of the Palestinian question. After the uprising began, the IDF invoked the so-called “Hannibal Directive,” which allows the military to kill Israeli civilians rather than let them be taken hostage.

The decision to screen the film at TIFF, which has reserved the 1,800-capacity Roy Thompson Hall for Wednesday’s premiere, has nothing to do with questions of artistic merit. On the contrary, the sordid process by which the film, initially excluded from one of the world’s most important film festivals, became a—if not the—marquee event of TIFF 2025 underscores the central role that financial and Canadian imperialist foreign policy interests play in the festival management’s decisions and those of the country’s other major cultural institutions.

The phony furor over TIFF “censorship”

On August 12, media reports emerged that TIFF had reversed its decision to screen The Road Between Us at this year’s festival, citing legal concerns that some of the footage recovered from captured GoPros by Hamas fighters had not been cleared for use, as well as a “potential threat of significant disruption.” 

These reports met with an immediate outcry of protest from the Zionist lobby in Canada, quickly joined and encouraged by the political elite and right-wing press. 

On August 13, Toronto City councillors James Pasternak and Brad Bradford issued a joint statement on X, declaring, “TIFF should not be banning or censoring films and should respect the freedoms of the arts community,” and concluding that the decision to cancel was a “moral failure.”

The very next day, TIFF capitulated to this reactionary campaign, now less than 48 hours old, and announced it would ensure the film would be screened during what is the festival’s 50th edition. With The Road Between US’s producers, explained TIFF CEO Cameron Bailey, “We have worked together to find a resolution to satisfy important safety, legal, and programming concerns.” 

This quick retreat did next to nothing, however, to appease the film’s ruling class promoters, who in the name of denouncing TIFF censorship, lashed out at the supposed intolerance of anti-Gaza genocide protesters.  

The National Post gave feature coverage to an op-ed penned by Sharren Haskel, who self-identifies as Israel’s “Canadian-born” deputy foreign minister. She voiced her outrage that TIFF sought “the ‘approval’ of terrorists,” who carry out “murders, rapes, and kidnappings,” and charged the festival with complicity “in silencing the truth.” She also slammed the Carney government for its empty announcement it would recognize a Palestinian state.

Canada, like the US and the other imperialist powers, is a key supporter of the Gaza genocide. Whether under Mark Carney or Justin Trudeau before him, the Liberal government has backed Israel’s genocidal campaign against Gaza and rampage across the Middle East to the hilt, shipping tens of millions of dollars in weaponry to Israel, while clamping down ruthlessly on anti-genocide protests at home.

Within Canada’s film industry the most prominent public statement of support for the screening of The Road Between US’s came from Susan Reitman Michaels, sister of the late producer/director Ivan Reitman, whose family is a major benefactor of TIFF. The family donated land for the home of the festival, the TIFF Lightbox complex in downtown Toronto. 

In an open letter Michaels wrote, “The irony is unbearable. My family’s gift of land to TIFF was intended as a memorial to my parents’ faith in freedom of expression, only to see that very principle eroded… What it looks like, and feels like, is the silencing of a Jewish voice at a time when Jewish voices are already being marginalized.” As intended, the letter elicited a thoroughly stage-managed “torrent of outrage,” with the festival reportedly receiving 60,000 emails objecting to the initial cancellation of the film.

The hypocrisy of Michaels and the other would-be warriors for “free speech” is staggering. None of them batted an eyelid, but on the contrary cheered on the political establishment when it systematically smeared and sought to intimidate hundreds of thousands of Canadians who participated in anti-genocide protests over the past two years. Anti-genocide activists calling for an end to Canadian imperialism’s supply of military equipment to Israel have faced arrest and harassment by the police, and in some cases the loss of their employment. The few voices who raised any criticism of the genocide within the political establishment, like former NDP member of the Ontario legislature Sarah Jama, were politically sidelined and silenced.

Moreover, the claim to be defending rights of “freedom of expression” on the one hand, while invoking the special rights of wealthy benefactors to influence programming decisions, reveals the class character of the objections.

In announcing the festival’s renewed commitment to screen The Road Between Us, TIFF CEO Bailey issued a cowardly mea culpa. “I want to apologize,” he declared, “for any hurt, frustration, or disappointment that our communication about the film has caused, and for any mischaracterizations that have taken root. We’re working now—and we will be for a while—to clarify things and to repair relationships.”

Bailey offered his fawning and, frankly, disgusting reassurance:

I want to be clear: claims that the film was rejected due to censorship are unequivocally false. Both TIFF and the filmmakers have heard the pain and frustration expressed by the public and we want to address this together.

The “pain and frustration” were not expressed by “the public,” but by TIFF’s wealthy donors, the Zionist lobby, and powerful sections of the corporate and political elite—many of them the very same forces who last year demanded that TIFF cancel screenings of a documentary that humanized Russian soldiers fighting in Ukraine.

It should be remembered that TIFF has a record of celebrating Zionism and Israel. In 2009, eight months after one of the Israeli military’s murderous assaults on Gaza, the film festival decided to honor Tel Aviv as the first city to be the subject of its new program, “City to City.” The decision provoked widespread outrage and protest.

Avrich, a Montreal-based filmmaker, has less than convincingly sought to talk his way out of any political intention behind his decision to make the film. Avrich told an interviewer for Deadline, “This film is not about politics, it’s about humanity, family and sacrifice.” 

Avrich and the IDF Major General Tibon used a joint interview with the Globe and Mail, published September 6, as an opportunity to double down on this transparent falsification, presenting their film, in the postmodernist jargon so prominent in artistic and academic circles, as simply one “story” among others. In a remark that reveals at best his indifference towards and more likely support for the greatest crime of the 21st century so far, Avrich blandly told the Globe that he was just “a guy in Canada who is attracted to a great story… I didn’t see anything outside that story.” The same line was taken by Tibon, who adds in the same interview that ”we didn’t say one word of politics.” Anyone who believes a word of this rubbish …

When the Globe interviewer gave them the opportunity, to say something about the plight of the Palestinians and the ongoing genocide, both Avrich and Tibon pointedly refused to do so.

An artist unmoved by genocide and who, in the face of the systematic destruction of an entire people, “didn’t see anything outside” the fate of a senior officer in this machinery of mass murder and his immediate family, deserves only contempt. This is not a matter of artistic freedom. Rather, it reflects a tendency to revel in a kind of cold indifference to mass human suffering cultivated within a privileged layer of the middle class, whose expanding stock portfolios and bank balances are tied up with the eruption of imperialist wars over the past three-and-a-half decades, culminating in the Gaza genocide as part of a rapidly developing third world war.

Toronto International Film Festival to screen propaganda film for Israel’s genocide in Gaza Read More »

Indonesia

Indonesian protests—a sign of social crisis and deep-seated opposition

By Peter Symonds.

Reposted below is the article of the World Socialist Web Site published on 07 September 2025.

In the wake of a huge police crackdown and thousands of arrests, the protest movement that erupted in Indonesia late last month has largely subsided, but none of the basic issues that fuelled the widespread demonstrations have been resolved. 

The immediate trigger for the protests was the decision to pay a huge monthly accommodation allowance of 50 million rupiah ($US3,045) to the 580 parliamentarians of the House of Representatives (DPR)—10 to 20 times the minimum wage paid to millions of workers struggling to survive.

The lavish allowance was emblematic of far deeper concerns and opposition stemming from the immense social gulf between the country’s wealthy few and their political representatives and the vast majority of working people. Moreover, the social crisis facing broad layers of the population, particularly young people, is only worsening as economic growth slows and unemployment rises. The jobless rate for youth has hit 16 percent, forcing many into poorly paid, casual work.

Indonesia
Protesters clash with the police during a protest against lavish allowances given to parliament members, in Jakarta, August 28, 2025. [AP Photo/Tatan Syuflana]

The protests dramatically escalated after the callous killing of a young ride-share motorbike rider Affan Kurniawan on August 28. He was run over by an armoured police vehicle amid a mass mobilisation of police, including the notorious, heavily-armed BRIMOB. In the following days, angry protesters clashed with police, attacked government buildings and stormed the homes of prominent political figures including Finance Minister Sri Mulyani, the architect of the budget cuts that set off protests earlier in the year. 

Facing a deepening political crisis, President Prabowo Subianto delayed a planned trip to China. He appeared at a press conference on August 31, flanked by leaders of the main political parties, to appeal for calm, declaring he understood “the genuine aspirations of the public.” At the same time, however, he ordered “the police and military to take the strongest possible action” against purported looting and destruction. 

The protests involving thousands were not limited to the capital Jakarta but had spread to major cities throughout the country, including Surabaya, Surakarta, Bandung, Semarang and Yogakarta in Java; Banda Aceh, Padang and Medan in Sumatra; as well as Makassar and Kendari in Sulawesi, Palangka Raya in Kalimantan, and Manokwari in West Papua.

At least 11 people died in the clashes with the police and military, hundreds were injured, and another 20 protesters are missing, according to the Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence. More than 3,000 people have been arrested. 

Confronting a police crackdown, the protests subsided last week but the anger has not. Smaller protests continued. Last Wednesday, hundreds of women from the Indonesian Women’s Alliance (IWA) marched to the parliament building in Jakarta wielding brooms to “sweep away the dirt of the state, militarism and police repression.”

Last Thursday, a student demonstration led by the All-Indonesian Students’ Union (BEM SI) took place outside the parliament, where its central coordinator Muzammil Ihsan read out a list of demands, including the reduction of parliamentary allowances, complete reform of the national police and parliament, the release of all those arrested and the creation of 19 million jobs. 

On the same day, members of the Labor Movement with the People (GEBRAK) held a protest in a major road in Jakarta also demanding the complete reform of the police and parliament.

On Thursday evening, a delegation of student leaders was invited to meet ministers at the Presidential Palace but reportedly walked out of the talks after being told they had to consider “the nation’s development” in making any demands. 

Last week, a grouping of activist organisations drew up a list of 17 short-term “people’s demands” to be implemented by Prabowo and the government by last Friday along with eight longer-term ones. The deadline, however, passed with few of the demands being met or partially met.

In a bid to quell widespread anger, the parliament did announce the axing of the housing allowance that initially sparked the protests. The announcement was left to the parliamentary speaker Puan Maharani. She is the daughter of former president Megawati Sukarnoputri, chairperson of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P)—the only parliamentary party that is not part of the Prabowo government.

On the same day, Co-ordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Airlangga Hartarto suggested that the government would carry out various stimulus measures to boost jobs and incomes—including wage subsidies for those earning less than 10 million rupiah a month, a program of public works, tax exemptions and steps to prevent mass lay-offs. But under conditions of a slowing economy that will be further hit by Trump’s tariffs, these proposals have the character of empty promises.

No steps have been taken to rein in the police and military. The only action taken against the police has been against low-level officers involved in the widely publicised killing of ride-share worker Affan Kurniawan. The officer in charge of the vehicle that struck Kurniawan has been dishonourably dismissed, and another received a seven-year demotion.

These measures are unlikely to assuage popular anger and resentment. Imran, a food delivery driver, told Al Jazeera that “inequality” was the root cause of the mass protests, “including economic inequality, educational inequality, health inequality and unequal public services.”

Referring to the government and parliament, he said: “They are not concerned about our fate. They should be present to resolve the problems facing the community, not fan the flames. These protests arose from the community’s poor economic conditions.”

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Rahmawati, a housewife, said that public anger had “finally exploded …because we feel like no one cares about us… What we want is for them [politicians] to care about us and our needs. Every year, the price of basic foodstuffs rises and never goes back down again. Groceries are becoming more and more difficult to afford.”

Significantly, the protests in Indonesia reverberated more broadly throughout South East Asia as workers and young people confront very similar economic and social problems, exacerbated by slowing economies. Protests took place last week in support of those in Indonesia, including in Malaysia and Thailand.

Thai students hung a banner on an overpass near Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok declaring “Thailand stands with the people of Indonesia” and called for justice for those protesters killed during police crackdowns.

In Thailand, a social media poster called Yammi shared instructions on how to order meals for Jakarta-based ride-share and food delivery motorbike riders. Revealing sympathy not just with the protesters but the difficult and dangerous conditions facing poorly paid riders, the post went viral in the region and internationally. Donations came in from Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei, as well as Japan, Sweden and the United States.

The protests have provided a glimpse of the explosive social tensions that have built up in Indonesia as well as the broader region and will only intensify amid growing global economic turmoil.

Indonesian protests—a sign of social crisis and deep-seated opposition Read More »

Commemoration

Katuwana Massacre: Relatives commemorate victims after 36 years of intimidation and continuing impunity

Our Correspondent.

Commemoration
Katuwana Massacre Victims – From right: Sisiliyana, Edwin, Nilmini, Mathangalatha, Sujithaseeli, Chandraleka and Niranjala. Chulananda, first from the Left, was assassinated in 1990.

On August 27, at Katuwana, in Hambantota District, the relatives of the seven family members, who were massacred by Sri Lanka Army in August 1989, held an event of commemoration of their loved-ones, at the same location where they were bombed. This was the first time a commemoration event was held in remembrance of these victims of state terror after 36 years of impunity and oppression. theSocialist.lk reporters were present at the occasion.

On that fateful night, three and half a decade plus one year ago, Sri Lanka army of the Singha Regiment – 6th Battalion invaded the house of the family, where the only male who was at home at the time was the 63 year old father, J.H.A. Edwin, a Sinhalaese traditional medical physician. The others were the 53-year-old mother, H.A. Sisiliyana; the three young daughters, namely J.H.A. Nilmini Asoka (25), J.H.A. Mathangalatha (20), J.H.A. Sujithaseeli (15); a niece, W.A. Chandraleka (24), and the 6 year old granddaughter, N.A. Niranjala Wilson. All were ethnic Sinhalese. The army killed them all on the spot or, according to some witnesses—who were also killed later—the four young girls were carried to the army camp, raped for three days and killed. The house was bombed and the family was burnt with the house. 

The relatives displayed the pictures of their loved ones and lit candles. Two surviving daughters, their husbands, grandchildren and their families and friends observed minutes of silence. Even decades later, their tears have not dried. Vimukthi, a grandson of Edwin addressed the gathering. He stated as follows: 

This is the first time in 36 years that we have been able to gather here publicly to speak their names…They were silenced by guns and disappeared into the shadows of mass graves and tire pyres.

For 36 long years, we could not hold this historic event in commemoration of their memory. We could not come here, speak their names, and mourn openly. The state of terror, the climate of repression, and the continued threat against those who sought truth and justice kept families like ours silent. But silence is not forgetfulness. These years have only deepened our grief and strengthened our determination.

Today we break that silence… Those who carried them out—from the military, death squads and the police to those who directed them—must be held accountable before history, if not yet before law.

Our relatives’ blood cries out not for revenge, but for truth and justice. It cries out for recognition that these lives mattered, that the poor, the villagers, the youth killed in those years were not expendable.

We carry your names and the memories of cruelties inflicted on you forward as a profound mark of protest, so that such crimes must never be repeated.

May your memory give courage to all who fight for truth, justice and dignity and against State repression.”

He also read out the name of J.H.A. Chulananda (22), the only son of Edwin and Sisiliyana, whom he stated was “a young man who aspired to justice and social equality but was misled by the reactionary political forces of the era”, and who was killed by Beliatta Police in October 1990.  He was said to be a member of fascist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) during the 1988-1990 insurgency. When the Army failed to capture or kill him, evidently, the massacre of his entire family was orchestrated as an act of reprisal and terrorization. 

Katuwana massacre commemoration
Family members of the Katuwana Massacre victims commemorate their loved ones, marking 36 years of impunity.

Testimonials 

We talked to the victims’ relatives. Edwin’s eldest surviving daughter Chandani (63) related to us her harrowing story of years of pain, endurance and struggle:

“People called my father Weda Mahattaya. He was very much loved by people. He was a very  innocent, kind and honest man. He walked slowly, smiled pleasantly, spoke gently, and wore a sarong and the national dress. Formerly, as a monk, he had published a number of Ayurvedic books. Many people who received medicinal treatment from him have met me and told me about the compassionate, and often free, treatment they received from my father and mother. 

Our family is a large one of six daughters, and my brother, Chulananda, was the only son. Our family’s economy was founded on meager but stable earnings from my father’s Ayurvedic practice. We had paddy land and acres of coconut, cinnamon and citronella land, which my father cultivated and managed. Due to litigations on land disputes, which my father all won, he lost financially, and his businesses collapsed.  We all lived in a thatched house, made of wattle and mud. However, my father could still afford to feed all of us well, educate us, and also help the needy. 

By 1971, my father was a strong supporter of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and Sirimavo Bandaranaike. However, by 1977, he was fed-up with and dissatisfied with the United Front government and voted for the United National Party, whose leader J.R.Jayawardene promised a “Dharmista Samajaya” [A society led by noble principles].  

We all went to Katuwana Maha Vidyalaya (school). My brother did not continue his education after grade seven. He was very kind-hearted, sociable, and very helpful to the villagers. He cared for his friends and neighbors more than his own family. He often stayed away from home longer than he stayed at home. He was outstanding, intelligent, fair-looking and, naturally, the youth considered him as their leader.  He wanted to do a job, but also never wanted to leave the village. I think he had made connections with the JVP since late 1987. 

My brother had earned the wrath of village thugs and  father’s former opponents. Once they even attempted to take his life by stabbing him. He narrowly escaped with his life, but his friend succumbed to the injuries. 

In 1979, I married a teacher and lived separately. One of my older sisters married a police officer and went to live in Welimada in early 1989. All other sisters were with my parents at home, Loku (Sujithaseeli), the next to youngest preparing for her Ordinary Level Examinations. Hichchi (Mathangalatha) was studying for the Advanced Level (A/L) examination. Neela (Nilmini) was attending vocational training courses after A/L in expectation of a job.

During the school vacation in August 1989, my two elder sisters [Nilmini and Mathangalatha] came to visit us at our residence at Walasmulla [17 km from Katuwana] by bus. Our parental home was just about half a kilometer away from the Army camp located in the Katuwana Govi Jana Seva [Aggrarian Services Center] premises. While my sisters were passing the army camp, some soldiers had shouted and remarked, “well, go, have a round and come”. That was on 26th August, a Saturday. 

My sisters had lunch with us. That was our last meal together. All my three children were much fond of staying with their grandparents and aunts. So, all three were crying and pleading to go with their aunts.  Finally,  my daughter, Niranjala went with them. 

On the morning of August 29th, my husband went to Katuwana with a friend to bring our daughter back home, as school vacation was ending. My husband saw the bombed house; he saw burning human flesh and a skull. Nobody was alive, including my child.  

After the incident, I went to lodge a complaint at Walsamulla Police, as there was no police station in Katuwana at the time. The police refused to record my complaint. The Officer in Charge (OIC), K.M. Premathilake put his pistol to my mouth and shouted, ‘You woman, keep your mouth shut. Those who take arms will perish by arms.’

Exactly on my 28th birthday, on October 22, 1990, my husband received information from one Silva that my brother had been killed by Beliatta Police. Dasanayake, OIC of the Beliatta Police, who had shot my brother, had quickly informed K. Danapala, the newly elected Provincial Councillor (PC), about the killing. Danapala [who expired a few years ago] feared my brother would pose a threat to his life, which was never the case. My brother’s body had been burnt on a tyre-pyre, after the body was shown to the satisfaction of Danapala.

Danapala too had had a land dispute with my father a long time ago. He lost a court case he had filed against my father. There was also a caste difference between Danapala and us. My father, and almost that entire block of the village, belonged to a higher caste than Danapala’s. Katuwana had a number of such blocks of houses called “Mandi”, where people of different castes lived.” 

Chandani’s husband, Chamal (69), related his traumatic experiences as follows:

”On the morning of 29 August, I went with a friend of mine in his car to Katuwana to bring my daughter back home. My friend wanted to meet Danapala Manthree (PC) and request his help to get his nephew released from Walasmulla Army camp. At the road barrier at the Katuwana Army Camp, the army stopped our car. My friend told them we were going to meet Manthree Thuma (Danapala). So, we were allowed to proceed. 

When we reached the place where the house was situated, I could not see the house. I could only see the smoke. I went closer. I could not believe my eyes. The house was demolished and everything was burning. I could see human flesh burning inside the house close to the main door. I saw a skull burning. I could not stand up. One or two villagers came to me and held me tight. A sister of my mother-in -law came to me and said, ‘Nobody is alive. Everybody is burnt’. I shouted, calling my daughter’s name. The aunt told me, ‘You should leave now. If the army comes and finds you, they will kill you too”. My friend then pushed me inside the car and brought me back home. I told my wife everything. She was devastated.

A couple of weeks later, Gamini, one of Danapala’s home guards [Grama Arakshaka – members of government’s Civil Security Force], told me that he and another guard were present with the army when they committed the crime, and asked me not to search for the family as everybody was killed by the army. He told me that the four sisters were taken to Katuwana army camp, raped and tortured there for three days, and then killed. It was not long afterwards that I came to know that both those guards were assassinated.

During the same period, we were trying to lodge complaints at police stations and even searched for them at army camps, as we believed they were still alive in some detention center. When my wife and I went to lodge a complaint at Walasmulla Police, we were chased away. I even dared to go to Walasmulla army camp to meet Captain P.L.U. Buddadhasa of the 6th Battalion, Singha Regiment, to find out some information about my relatives. He just told me, ‘Do not search for them. They are all dead. Do some religious observances for them’.  When I went to complain to the ASP [Assistant Superintendent of Police] office at Tangalle, ASP Ekanayake warned me, saying, ‘You are a teacher; do not try to search for them. Otherwise, you will lose your own life.’

I was able to lodge a complaint at Middeniya Police only in late September 1994, after Madam Chandrika Kumaratunga was elected President. We were also able to complain to the Presidential Commission on Disappearances. The Muttetuwegama Commission’s final report contains the seven names of our relatives.

However, the court case never proceeded after 1998. We have learned that the Police had colluded with Danapala to systematically bury the case, four years after the collection of samples from the massacre site. 

Due to the lasting psychological shock my wife and I had to endure, I could not continue my work as a teacher with sincerity. Therefore, I decided to retire under the Circular No.44/90. Thereafter, the conditions of our family worsened. I had to struggle for sustenance for my family of four children.

Chandrika soon resumed the war with the LTTE [Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]. By 1998, we learned of the crimes committed by the Sri Lankan army against innocent Tamil people in Jaffna. The case of Krishanti Kumaraswamy and her family’s murder at Chemmani shook our souls. Then we realized the extent of the crimes Tamils must have been forced to suffer in the North, sometimes even beyond the crimes committed against our family. Later, Mahinda Rajapaksa continued the war, and his and all succeeding governments praised the mercenaries as ‘Rana Viruvo’ [war heroes]. Throughout, we were silenced.”

He also told us about his experience with the false “human rights” crusaders of the time: 

“The orphaned youngest sister of my wife was studying and living with us during that period. Once, in early 1997, I went with her to meet Mahinda Rajapaksa at his Carlton office, seeking his help to find a job for her. My parents had worked for D.A. Rajapaksa and I myself had, as a youth, campaigned for Mahinda’s elections. So, I knew him personally. After waiting a long time to meet him, we forcibly entered his room and informed him of our predicament after the massacre of the family. He shouted at us: ‘Look, these people have worked for the JVP and got themselves killed, and now have come seeking my help to get jobs’. My sister-in-law was crying. She never received a job from him, nor any assistance.” 

The other surviving daughter, Indumathi expressed her first hand experience of the wrath the local politician had toward the family: 

“Since my father supported the UNP in elections in late 1988 and early 1989, after the general elections, my father went with me to talk to Danapala Manthree. Our parental home was just a few yards away from his residence. He was the uncle of Ananda Kularathna, then UNP cabinet minister from the Mulkirigala seat. We later came to understand that my brother was at that time full time engaged in the activities of the JVP, which had ordered people not to vote at elections [the provincial council election in the Southern Province was held in June 1988]. Danapala seemingly saw his life as threatened by the JVP and its military wing, Deshapremi Janatha Viyaparaya (DJV). However, villagers say my brother never left any room for harm to be inflicted upon anybody in the village, not even on those who envied our family. Danapala ferociously denied any help in finding jobs for me or anyone else in our family. He shouted: ‘There is a terrorist in your house. If it were not for Weda Mahattaya, you and your house would already have been reduced to ashes.’ 

But, neither my parents nor anybody even dreamt of an impending massacre, because we had not heard of such incidents before. 

About two days before the bombing of our home, my elder sister Neela sent me a letter saying that the previous day there had been a bomb blast in the area targeting the army, which had killed several soldiers. My sister wrote that now they felt their lives were also in danger. I think the day she posted that letter was the day she and Hichchi visited my eldest sister at her home in Walasmulla. When she sent that letter, our youngest sister was with me at my house. So, her life was saved.”

Sunitha, the youngest surviving daughter and now a teacher, tearfully recalled her loving parents, her brother, and the harassment by the armed forces:

“My father was a Bodhisattva [a reference to the noble lives of Buddha before enlightenment]. As a skilled physician, sought after by people from different parts of the country, I witnessed how miraculously he saved the lives of many patients who had been brought after snakebites. I also saw how skillfully he cured limb and arm injuries caused by various accidents. My mother was the perfect match for my father. Like a goddess, she was dedicated day and night to treating patients. 

Our father had written and published a couple of Veda Grantha [medicinal books]. They were written in verse form. Sarpa Visha Sanharaya I and II [Neutralizing Serpent Venom], Bilindu Roga Sanharaya [Treating Pediatric Illnesses] were very popular, and Manthra Sathakaya [Hundred Mantras] is a book still being sold in bookstores.

He never harmed anybody, not even an insect. I cannot understand how cruel one must be to aim a weapon at such a man of glory and kill him. This world is cursed!

My brother was very handsome. He was always helpful and empathetic toward others. He was a leader to the village youth. Sometimes, village youth even betrayed him, not because of any wrongdoing he committed, but to save themselves when they were arrested for small disputes and fights.

About ten months before the massacre of our family, the chief of the Katuwana Army Camp came to our former house with other soldiers and asked my father to remove all necessary belongings, as they were going to burn our house at 7:00 p.m. that night. My father pleaded with him: “Do not harm us. If my son has done anything wrong, you may punish him.” But they burned our house. The house by the side of Rukmalpitiya Road, where our family was living at the time of the massacre, was built later, about a hundred meters away from the former house on the same road.

I remember, during the period of state terror, the army often intruded into our home and searched everywhere inside. We were always terrorized. They knew very well that my brother was not there, and that only our elderly parents and we girls were present. They questioned us about our brother and even searched for books. Sometimes, they even came in the middle of the night while we were sleeping. Then they would ask us to turn off the lamps (kerosene lamps) and search here and there.”

A systematized killing spree 

In both the South and the North, the Sri Lankan ruling elite deployed the full apparatus of the state—the military and police, death squads, the Prevention of Terrorism Act, and Emergency Regulations—to eliminate perceived threats to capitalist rule from the political right and, above all, against the innocent rural poor and the oppressed. Theorizing the causes of large scale disappearances during the period, Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) report in December 1997 stated,

 “[U]nder the emergency regulations, all restraints on law enforcement officers were removed, and the power to dispose of dead bodies was left to the sole discretion of these officers. Judicial supervision was suspended. There were no provisions even to keep records of the disposed bodies.”

The report further stated as follows:

“Disappearances were the result of a very deliberate policy and were implemented meticulously according to a plan. Law enforcement officers received instructions to arrest, kill and dispose of the bodies. Enacting emergency regulations made this legally possible. The police were constantly coached to carry out killings, and there were methods of supervising how many were to be killed in each area. Incentives were given through the distribution of money for killer squads. 

Liquor was also provided to these squads to keep them in a mood conducive to participation in such activities. Lists of those who were to be killed were distributed. Special interrogations were held in special places for interrogation. In many instances, the decision to kill was made during these interrogations, and people were murdered in the secret surroundings of these places. Law enforcement officers mingled with illegal elements in undertaking these activities. Politicians were given direct access to these groups so that they could execute the wishes of these politicians.”

The Commission Report and the Buried Lists

In November 1994, president Kumaratunga appointed three presidential commissions to  inquire into incidents of involuntary removals or disappearances of persons after 1 January 1988. The commission chaired by Manouri Muttetuwegama inquired into incidents in Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces.

In response to the Commission’s request to provide information on the officers who were attached to the Katuwana Army Camp at the time, on 30 June 1997, the Army replied “not mentioned” in their records—the same answer given in response to most of the other camps. The Commission did not take any further steps to obtain the information from the Army.

The alleged perpetrators of these crimes were shielded by the very recommendations of the Commission itself. While the Commission “found the information and material upon which the allegations of the witnesses were based to be prima facie credible,” it nevertheless stated: “we recommend that the lists of names of persons alleged to have been responsible for involuntary removals or disappearances sent by us under separate cover be not published,” until further investigations were carried out. No such “further investigations” were ever undertaken by Kumaratunga’s government or by successive governments, thereby granting the perpetrators lifelong impunity and protection to commit further crimes. To this day, these confidential lists and the witness testimonies remain undisclosed to the public.

theSocialist.lk has pointed out the class character of the government’s policies of repression during the counterinsurgency in the South, which were later carried forward against the ethnic Tamil population in the North and East, in order to defend the capitalist unitary state and the interests of finance capital. 

These atrocities of the capitalist state cannot—and could not—be prevented, nor justice established, without the abolition of the parasitic state, its military, police, laws, and capitalist class rule. This is the historic task of the working class, rallying behind it the petty bourgeoisie and the oppressed masses, as part of the united struggle of the South Asian and international working class for socialist policies.

Katuwana Massacre: Relatives commemorate victims after 36 years of intimidation and continuing impunity Read More »

Summit

Leaders of China, Russia and India gather for Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit

By Peter Symonds

Reposted below is the article of the World Socialist Web Site published on 02 September 2025.

The two-day gathering of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) leaders finished yesterday in the Chinese city of Tianjin. The host, Chinese President Xi Jinping, put forward his vision of a multi-polar world in opposition to “hegemonism and power politics”—a barely veiled criticism of the US.

Summit
Putin, Modi and Xi. [AP Photo/Suo Takekuma]

The grouping has its roots in what was dubbed the “Shanghai Five,” formed by China and Russia with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan in 1996 to counter US interventions in Central Asia following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The SCO was formally established in 2001 and expanded to include Uzbekistan. India, Pakistan, Belarus and Iran have subsequently been included as full members, while 14 other countries including Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are dialogue partners.

While the attendance of many of the 20 leaders at the summit was unremarkable, the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi—his first visit to China in seven years—triggered alarm bells in Washington. US imperialism has carefully cultivated economic and strategic relations with India for well over a decade, as it has accelerated its preparations for war with China, which it regards as the chief threat to US global dominance. 

Modi had previously signalled that he would not be attending the summit, citing his necessary attendance at a sitting of India’s parliament, in what could only be construed as a calculated snub to China. Although a thaw had begun, relations between the two countries were frosty following military clashes along their disputed border in 2020 that left 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers dead.

Modi abruptly changed his plans amid a standoff with the Trump administration over India’s purchase of oil from Russia. In early August, Trump attempted to bully India into submission by doubling tariffs on Indian exports to the US to a massive 50 percent. Modi refused to cave in and the final 25 percent of the tariff hit came into effect last week. Indeed, Reuters reported last Thursday that India plans to increase purchases of Russian oil by between 10 and 20 percent. 

Trump had been pressing India and China to end imports of Russia oil as a lever to strongarm Russian President Vladimir Putin into making concessions to Ukraine as part of negotiations over a ceasefire in the ongoing war. The fact that Trump had not imposed a similar tariff punishment increase on China to that on India was no doubt doubly galling for Modi, given India’s longstanding strategic partnership with the US.

Modi’s presence in China this week was something of a diplomatic coup for Xi, who effusively welcomed him on Sunday, saying the two countries must not let the border issue define overall relations, and should be development partners not rivals. Modi, in turn, declared that there was now an “atmosphere of peace and stability” between them. 

Modi and Xi met in Russia last October on the sidelines of the BRICS summit shortly after reaching a border patrol agreement. Over recent weeks, a further warming of relations has been evidenced by the re-establishment of direct flights and a lifting of Chinese export restrictions on India including on rare earths. Yesterday, according to Modi, the two leaders discussed reducing India’s huge trade deficit of $99 billion with China, the country’s largest trading partner.

Xi clearly used the SCO summit as a platform to demonstrate China’s ability to counter US efforts to isolate it internationally and encircle it militarily. “Global governance has reached a new crossroads,” he said. 

In another swipe at the US and Trump, without naming names, Xi criticised “bullying practices” and declared: “The house rules of a few countries should not be imposed on others.” 

The meeting agreed to Xi’s proposal for a new SCO development bank in a move to further undermine the dominance of the US dollar in world trade and finance. Beijing is to provide 10 billion yuan ($US1.4 billion) in loans to the new banking consortium and another 2 billion yuan in aid to member states this year. China also plans to build an artificial intelligence cooperation centre for SCO nations. 

Putin also used the opportunity to call for “genuine multilateralism” to lay the groundwork for “a new system of stability and security in Eurasia.” In an obvious reference to the US and NATO, he added: “This security system, unlike Euro-centric and Euro-Atlantic models, … [would be] truly balanced, and would not allow one country to ensure its own security at the expense of others.”

Putin also lashed out against the US and NATO over the war in Ukraine, saying it “did not arise as a result of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, but rather as a consequence of a coup d’état [in 2014] in Ukraine, which was supported and provoked by the West.” He praised the efforts of China and India in facilitating a resolution to the crisis and said he would inform SCO members of details of last month’s negotiations with Trump in Alaska in bilateral meetings. 

Both China and India have called for an end to the war, but at the same time pointedly refused to condemn Russia’s 2022 invasion.

Efforts were made to present an atmosphere of conviviality and bonhomie. Modi and Putin arrived together in Putin’s vehicle to yesterday’s meeting after a lengthy discussion and joined Xi for a photo opportunity holding hands in a close circle. The Indian and Russian leaders also publicly praised their own discussions. 

An editorial in the Washington Post entitled “Trump’s white-knuckling with India could backfire” expressed the alarm in US ruling circles that the White House’s crude attempt to use hefty tariffs to bludgeon New Delhi into submission and break up longstanding Indian ties with Russia had failed. 

“Beijing remains Washington’s most powerful rival. In purely economic terms, China is already a far more formidable adversary than the Soviet Union ever was,” it noted, then concluded:

“Trump’s zero-sum approach is to not leave any money on the table in negotiations. Even in business, that’s arguably a mistake. Goodwill has value. Trump’s talks with China might yet turn out to be every bit as bruising as those he is having with allies. Maybe that’s when he might appreciate better relations with friends.”

Trump officials, however, have shown no signs of heeding the advice. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the SCO summit as “performative” and denounced India and China as “bad actors” that were “fuelling the Russian war machine”. Trump’s anti-China trade adviser Peter Navarro condemned India as “arrogant,” declaring that the “Brahmins are profiteering at the expense of the Indian people” with the Russia oil trade. In a fit of exasperation, Navarro branded the conflict in Ukraine as “Modi’s war.” 

Modi has no intention of immediately rupturing relations with the US. On his way to the SCO summit, he stopped in Tokyo where he praised the work of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue or Quad—a quasi-military pact with Japan, the US and Australia. Speaking to Nikkei Asia, Modi repeated stock standard US propaganda, declaring: “As vibrant democracies, open economies and pluralistic societies, we are committed to a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific”—directed against “authoritarian” China.

Like the other SCO members including China and Russia, India aggressively pursues its economic and strategic interests amid worsening international economic turmoil, exacerbated by Trump’s trade war measures, along with heightened geo-political tensions and an emerging world war. Wracked by social tensions at home and divided by many unresolved disputes, none of them has a progressive solution to the global eruption of imperialist violence and deepening crisis of the capitalist system.

Leaders of China, Russia and India gather for Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit Read More »

Scroll to Top