lead article

Gen-Z

The Gen-Z Uprisings and the Crisis of Leadership: Permanent Revolution against ‘Leaderless’ movements and ‘Left Populism’ – Part 1

By Sanjaya Jayasekera.

We publish here Part 1 of a series examining the global wave of Gen Z protests, the deepening crisis of revolutionary leadership, and the necessity of fighting for the program of socialist internationalism on the basis of Leon Trotsky’s Theory of Permanent Revolution.

Gen-Z
“Gen Z” Madagascar supporters wave the skull and crossbones flag during a gathering at May 13 Square in Antananarivo, Madagascar, Saturday, Oct. 18, 2025. [AP Photo/Brian Inganga]

From the streets of Dhaka to Nairobi, from Colombo to Kathmandu, from Manila to every corner of the former colonial world—from Morocco to Peru, from Madagascar onward—a wave of youth-led uprisings has shaken the global capitalist order between 2022 and 2025. These movements have captured global attention with their scale, militancy, and apparent spontaneity. In September 2024, in Bangladesh, millions, predominantly angry youth, marched demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina1.  In Kenya, the largest and most sustained protest movement since its Independence from colonial Britain took place from June 20242 to last month, where Generation Z (Gen-Z) protesters stormed parliament and brought President William Ruto’s government to the brink of collapse over his proposed austerity law. Sri Lanka’s youth occupation of Galle Face Green in July 2022 forced President Gotabaya Rajapakse to flee the country. Nepal saw its government toppled amid deadly street battles last September. Last month, the Philippines witnessed its largest demonstrations in two decades, while, on October 14, Madagascar President Andry Rajoelina was toppled following a mass popular mobilization and subsequent military intervention. These movements unfolded alongside hundreds of mass demonstrations—mobilizing millions across Europe and around the globe—against Zionist Israel’s genocide in Gaza, against the Trump administration’s preparations for a presidential dictatorship in the United States, and against the growing belligerency of imperialism around the world.

In Bangladesh, the military installed Muhammad Yunus, a banker with close ties to Western imperialism, who immediately announced “robust and far-reaching economic reforms”—a transparent code for savage International Monetary Fund austerity. In Kenya, late opposition leader Raila Odinga, who had postured as champion of the masses, joined hands with Ruto’s government to implement the identical policies the protests opposed, while the country was designated a US “major non-NATO ally”. Sri Lanka’s uprising delivered power to Ranil Wickremesinghe, a pro-IMF stooge who ruthlessly enforced austerity using police-state repression. Nepal’s protests were exploited by the military to install a technocratic interim government headed by former Chief Justice Sushila Karki, sidelining all political parties while maintaining capitalist rule.

For the millions of youth who risked their lives in these struggles, the outcomes represent devastating betrayals. The fundamental questions facing the working class and the oppressed masses remain unresolved: How can youth secure jobs, education, and a decent future? How can democratic rights be defended against increasingly authoritarian regimes? How can the stranglehold of imperialist finance capital be broken? Most urgently, as the United States and NATO prepare for catastrophic wars against Russia and China, how can the working class and youth prevent themselves from becoming cannon fodder in conflicts that serve only the interests of rival capitalist powers? 

The answer lies not in the “leaderless”— so, fundamentally pro-imperialist and pro-capitalist— mythology promoted by pseudo-left organizations, nor in the anti-corruption frameworks that channel mass anger into support for one bourgeois faction against another. It requires understanding why these movements, despite their revolutionary potential, have been systematically hijacked by forces defending capitalism. It demands a return to the theoretical foundations established by Leon Trotsky in his Theory of Permanent Revolution and defended by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) against decades of Stalinist, Maoist, and Pabloite revisionism. Above all, it necessitates the independent political mobilization of the working class under revolutionary leadership—the building of sections of the ICFI in every country to wage the struggle for world socialist revolution. 

Global Gen-Z uprisings and their betrayed outcomes

The Gen-Z protest movements of 2022-2025 follow a remarkably consistent pattern across continents, revealing not isolated national phenomena but expressions of a single global crisis of capitalism.

Sri Lanka 2022 provided the template. Between April and July, hundreds of thousands took to the streets as skyrocketing prices, fuel shortages, power-cuts, fertilizer cuts and crop destruction, and medicine scarcity made life unbearable. The COVID-19 pandemic and the economic disruption from the US-NATO proxy war against Russia in Ukraine had devastated global supply chains. Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves collapsed, forcing the government to default on its debt and halt vital imports. Mass protests erupted with demands that President Rajapakse resign—”Gota Go Home”—and that all 225 parliamentarians be removed, in which millions drawn from rural and urban poor participated across ethnic lines (except for the fact that the struggles could not gather support largely from the youth of Jaffna in the North of the country and from the up-country estate workers primarily because they saw no regime change in the South would solve any of their fundamental problems, and not necessarily due to the stronghold of discredited bourgeois Tamil nationalists and the trade union bureaucracy operating within those communities). Trade unions were compelled to call two limited one-day general strikes on April 28 and May 6, demonstrating the immense power of the working class when it intervenes. Rajapakse was forced to flee the country on July 13, 2022.

But the political leadership of the movement remained in the hands of trade union bureaucrats, the pseudo-left Frontline Socialist Party (FSP), youth proxies of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and middle-class groups at Galle Face Green, all of which subordinated the working class to demands for a transitional “interim government” that would preserve capitalist rule. Parliament was thus able to install Wickremesinghe, who imposed the IMF’s austerity program with an iron fist, using draconian legislation including the Essential Public Service Act to suppress worker opposition. The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) warned at the time: “The emancipation of the working class is the task of the workers themselves,” and that “there is no solution to the immense social problems and an end to the suppression of democratic rights within the existing social order.” However, the SEP’s forces remained limited, and it was not yet in a position to provide the mass revolutionary leadership necessary to mobilize a general strike and transform the popular uprising into a struggle for workers’ power. The decades-long betrayals of Stalinism, Maoism and nationalist trade union bureaucracies, and Pabloism within the Fourth International, had systematically undermined working-class consciousness, which in turn pressured the party into alienation, and prevented the emergence of a mass Trotskyist party capable of leading the working class, youth, and oppressed layers of the middle class in a united revolutionary offensive.

Bangladesh 2024 witnessed a similar trajectory compressed into explosive weeks. In July, university students organized under Students Against Discrimination began protesting a regressive job quota system. When Hasina’s government responded with murderous violence—unleashing police, military units, and Awami League thugs who killed scores of students—the protests escalated dramatically. By early August, millions were marching to Dhaka, expressing not merely anger over the quota system but accumulated rage over grinding poverty, massive inequality, and ruthless exploitation in the garment industry that produces billions in exports. The military, unable to contain the uprising, forced Hasina to resign and flee to India on August 5.

The military immediately installed an interim administration headed by Yunus, whose “close connections with US and European imperialist powers” were emphasized even in mainstream coverage. The Bangladesh National Party and Stalinist parties grouped in the Left Democratic Alliance pledged their full support. Throughout this upheaval, the trade unions and pseudo-left forces, including the Workers Party of Bangladesh, worked systematically to prevent the working class from intervening as an independent force with its own program3. The World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) correctly analyzed: “Workers and their families joined the student-initiated protests. However, they did so as individuals, not as a class, using strikes and other weapons of class struggle and advancing their own demands.”

Kenya’s Gen-Z insurgency in June-August 2024 represented perhaps the most politically advanced of these movements. Youth unemployment reaching 67 percent, combined with IMF-dictated tax increases in the Finance Bill 2024, ignited mass protests demanding President William Ruto’s resignation. The movement transcended the tribal divisions that the Kenyan ruling class has stoked for decades to weaken the working class4. On “Bloody Tuesday,” June 25, police opened fire on demonstrators, killing dozens as they stormed parliament. Over 60 would die in the uprising, with scores abducted by security forces.

Kenya Gen-Z
Protesters scatter as Kenya police spray water cannon at them during a protest over proposed tax hikes in a finance bill in downtown Nairobi, Kenya, June. 25, 2024. [AP Photo/Brian Inganga]

Ruto tactically withdrew the Finance Bill, but this concession only exposed the underlying conspiracy among the ruling class. In August, Raila Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement (ODM)—which had postured as opposition—joined Ruto’s government5. The Central Organization of Trade Unions (COTU), led by Francis Atwoli, and influential Christian and Muslim clergy backed this coalition government. Austerity policies continue, the military has been deployed against civilian protesters for the first time in Kenyan history, and the country was designated a US “major non-NATO ally” by the Biden administration, positioning it as a proxy force in Washington’s preparations for war with China. 

The subsequent strike wave by teachers, transport workers, healthcare staff, and civil servants demonstrated the potential for working-class power. Yet COTU and the Stalinist Communist Party Marxist-Kenya (CPM-K) worked tirelessly to prevent these strikes from becoming a political challenge to the regime, insisting instead on “no politics” and “leaderless” organization that left the field open for bourgeois forces6.

The uprisings in Nepal (September 2025) and the Philippines (September 2025) confirmed that this pattern extends across Asia. In Nepal, protests triggered by a government ban on 26 social media platforms and fueled by deep resentment over the lavish lifestyles of “nepo kids”—the children of politicians exposed through viral videos—left at least 51 dead. The homes of prominent politicians including former prime ministers were vandalized and set ablaze. Parliament was stormed and burned. Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli was forced to resign, but the outcome was a technocratic interim government headed by Karki, with the military playing a decisive role behind the scenes. As the WSWS reported, Chief of Army Staff Ashok Raj Sigdel “warned that the military would be forced to declare a state of emergency if no political solution would be found,” compelling party leaders to consent to parliament’s dissolution.

The Philippines saw its largest demonstrations in two decades, with 100,000 rallying in Manila on September 21—the 53rd anniversary of Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s declaration of martial law7. The protests were triggered by exposures of massive graft in flood control infrastructure—involving billions stolen through kickbacks to officials and fraudulent contracts. Yet the political character of these protests was “markedly middle-class.” Stalinist organization BAYAN and the pseudo-left Akbayan party led separate rallies, both increasingly aligned with bourgeois factions hostile to China and integrated into Washington’s war preparations. President Marcos Jr. announced his support for the protests “as long as they were peaceful,” attempting to contain any genuine threat to its rule.

Madagascar (October 2025) demonstrated the pattern’s most dramatic expression, with President Andry Rajoelina forcibly removed and exfiltrated by French military aircraft. The uprising erupted in late September when chronic power and water shortages—leaving over 75 percent of the population subsisting on less than €0.80 per day outraged—triggered protests led by the Gen Z Mada formation. When authorities arrested two city politicians who had planned a demonstration on September 25, protests spread rapidly across the island. The regime responded with murderous repression: at least 22 killed, hundreds injured, a dusk-to-dawn curfew imposed, and the appointment of General Zafisambo as Prime Minister on October 6 in a desperate militarization that only deepened the crisis.

On October 14, the CAPSAT military unit—which had itself backed Rajoelina’s rise to power in 2009—toppled him through a coordinated intervention. Colonel Michael Randrianirina announced the dissolution of the Senate and High Constitutional Court while maintaining the National Assembly, providing constitutional veneer to what was fundamentally a coup. Most revealing was French imperialism’s direct role: on October 12, Rajoelina fled aboard a French aircraft in an operation coordinated with Paris and approved by President Emmanuel Macron. The company facilitating his escape, TOA Aviation, was the same that had enabled fugitive automotive boss Renault CEO Carlos Ghosn’s extralegal flight from Japan. Macron emphasized “constitutional order” without condemning repression, exposing France’s concern not for democracy but for protecting strategic interests in Malagasy energy, telecommunications, and rare earth minerals.

The Malagasy Trade Union Solidarity collective, comprising about fifty unions, called a general strike demanding Rajoelina’s resignation and wage increases after a freeze since 2022, while calling on the Church and local elites for “dialogue”. The opposition parties Tiako i Madagasikara (TIM) and Malagasy Miara-Miainga (MMM) positioned themselves as alternatives. This was essentially an opportunistic role, “channeling popular anger into the narrow framework of institutional negotiations while safeguarding the foundations of capitalism.”8 The military intervention aimed to defend bourgeois order and preserve the interests of imperialism and the national bourgeoisie, replicating the pattern observed in Egypt and Tunisia 2011 where “the supposed neutrality or support of the army served to defuse mobilization, restore bourgeois order, and ensure the continuity of the capitalist system under a new facade.”

Across all these movements, certain features recur with striking consistency: economic crisis driven by IMF austerity and capitalist breakdown, and chronic social inequality; massive youth and middle-class participation; violent state repression; the promotion of “leaderless” organization by pseudo-left groups; the systematic blocking of independent working-class political action by trade union bureaucracies and parties based on the petty-bourgeoisie; and outcomes that serve imperialist strategic interests while intensifying the exploitation of the masses.

To be continued…

  1. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Bangladeshi Prime Minister flees to India amid mass uprising’ (6 August 2024) ↩︎
  2. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Mass protests against Kenyan President Ruto’s IMF-dictated Finance Bill‘ (20 June 2024) ↩︎
  3. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Bangladesh’s right-wing interim government moves to consolidate its power, end popular ferment’ (23 August 2024) ↩︎
  4. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Kenya’s Gen Z insurgency, the strike wave and the struggle for Permanent Revolution – Part 1‘ (3 October 2024) ↩︎
  5. World Socialist Web Site, ‘One year since the Gen-Z Uprising in Kenya: The need for a socialist and internationalist strategy’ (24 June 2025) ↩︎
  6. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Ruto’s new Kenyan coalition government to reinstate rejected tax measures’ (21 August 2024) ↩︎
  7. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Major protests against corruption in the Philippines’ (21. September 2025) ↩︎
  8. World Socialist Web Site, ‘Madagascar president Rajoelina flees with French aid amid mass Gen Z protests’ (19 October 2025) 
    ↩︎

The Gen-Z Uprisings and the Crisis of Leadership: Permanent Revolution against ‘Leaderless’ movements and ‘Left Populism’ – Part 1 Read More »

Thermonuclear

ට්‍රම්ප් එක්සත් ජනපද න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කරන බව නිවේදනය කරයි

ඇන්ඩ්‍රේ ඩේමන් විසිනි. 

මෙහි පලවන්නේ ලෝක සමාජවාදී වෙබ් අඩවියේ (ලෝසවෙඅ) 2025 ඔක්තෝම්බර් 31 දින ‘Trump announces resumption of US nuclear weapons testing’ යන හිසින් පලවූ ඇන්ඩ්‍රේ ඩේමන් විසින් ලියන ලද ඉදිරිදර්ශන ලිපියේ සිංහල පරිවර්තනය යි.

Thermonuclear
1952 නොවැම්බර් 1 වන දින මාෂල් දූපත් වල එනෙවෙටැක් අටෝල් මත ලොව ප්‍රථම තාප න්‍යෂ්ටික උපාංගයක් (හයිඩ්‍රජන් බෝම්බයක්) අත්හදා බැලීමෙන් පසු හතු වලාකුළ.[AP ඡායාරූපය/ලොස් ඇලමොස් ජාතික රසායනාගාරය]

තුන්වන ලෝක යුද්ධය සඳහා වන සූදානම සීමා කරන ඉතිරිව ඇති සියලුම ආරක්ෂක වැටවල් ඉවත් කිරීම සදහා  එක්සත් ජනපදය ගත් නවතම පියවර ලෙස, බ්‍රහස්පතින්දා(29), ජනාධිපති ඩොනල්ඩ් ට්‍රම්ප් එක්සත් ජනපද න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කරන බව නිවේදනය කලේය. ලෝකයේ සියලුම රටවල් නිල වශයෙන් න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් තහනම් කර තිබියදී, මෙම පියවර මගින් එක්සත් ජනපදය මෙම ක්‍රියාවට ඉඩ දෙන ලෝකයේ එකම රට බවට පත්වේ.

මාරාන්තික විකිරණ වායුගෝලයට විසුරුවා හැරීම සහ භූගත ජලය දූෂණය කිරීමට අමතරව, න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම්, වැරදි ගණනය කිරීම් හෝ හිතාමතා ප්‍රකෝප කිරීම් හරහා හෝ න්‍යෂ්ටික යුද්ධයක හැකියාව පුළුල් කරන දැවැන්ත යුද උන්මාදී ක්‍රියාවක් ලෙස විශ්වීය වශයෙන් වටහාගෙන ඇත.

කියුබානු මිසයිල අර්බුදයේදී එක්සත් ජනපදය සහ සෝවියට් සංගමය න්‍යෂ්ටික යුද්ධයක අද්දරට පැමිණ වසරකට පසු, 1963 දී, කෙනඩි පරිපාලනය අර්ධ න්‍යෂ්ටික පරීක්ෂණ තහනම් ගිවිසුම (Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty) සාකච්ඡා කළ අතර, එමඟින් භූගතව සිදු කරන ලද ඒවා හැර අනෙකුත් සියලුම න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් තහනම් කරන ලදී. 1992 දී, සෝවියට් සංගමය විසුරුවා හැරීමෙන් පසුව, ජනාධිපති ජෝර්ජ් එච්.ඩබ්ලිව්. බුෂ් න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් සඳහා ඒකපාර්ශ්වික තහනමක් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කළේය.

අත්හදා බැලීම් තහනම් කිරීමට පෙර දශක කිහිපය තුළ, න්‍යෂ්ටික පිපිරීම් 2,000 කට වඩා සිදු කරනු ලැබ ඇති අතර, ඉන් අඩකට වඩා සිදු කරන ලද්දේ එක්සත් ජනපදය විසිනි. මෙම පරීක්ෂණ ඇමරිකානු බටහිර ඇතුළත සහ දකුණු පැසිෆික් කලාපය පුරා ප්‍රජාවන් රෝගාතුර කළ අතර මුළු ප්‍රදේශම ජනාවාස කළ නොහැකි තත්ත්වයට පත් කළේය.

ට්‍රම්ප් මෙම නිවේදනය නිකුත් කළේ, දැනට ක්‍රියාත්මක වන ඇමරිකානු-චීන වෙළඳ යුද්ධය පිළිබඳව දකුණු කොරියාවේ සාකච්ඡා සඳහා චීන ජනාධිපති ෂී ජින්පින් හමුවීමට ටික වේලාවකට පෙරය. ට්‍රම්ප් ඇමරිකානු න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි ගබඩාව ලෝක වේදිකාවේ ඇමරිකානු අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයේ කොල්ලකාරී අවශ්‍යතා සුරක්ෂිත කිරීමේ මාධ්‍යයක් ලෙස භාවිතා කලේ, න්‍යෂ්ටික යුද්ධය හරහා සමූලඝාතනය කිරීමේ තර්ජනය මානව වර්ගයාගේ හිසට ඉහළින් ලෙලවමිනි.

ලොව විශාලතම න්‍යෂ්ටික වැඩසටහන එක්සත් ජනපදය සතුව ඇති අතර, රුසියාව සහ චීනය එක්ව වැය කරන මුදල මෙන් දෙගුණයක් න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි සඳහා වැය කරයි. දෙවන ලෝක යුද්ධය අවසානයේ සෝවියට් සංගමයට තර්ජනය කිරීම සඳහා හිරෝෂිමා සහ නාගසාකි හි අනාරක්ෂිත ජනගහනය සමූලඝාතනය කරමින් න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි භාවිතා කළ එකම රට ද එක්සත් ජනපදයයි.

ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ නිවේදනය වාර්තා කිරීමේදී, එක්සත් ජනපද මාධ්‍ය එයට කිසිදු ඓතිහාසික සන්දර්භයක් හෝ පූර්වගාමීත්වයක් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමට අපොහොසත් වී ඇත. එහෙත්, එම නිවේදනය හුදෙක් ක්ෂණික සිතුවිල්ලක් වීමට වඩා වෙනස්ව, අවම වශයෙන් 2020 සිට එක්සත් ජනපද හමුදා සැලසුම්කරුවන් න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කිරීම පිළිබඳව ක්‍රියාකාරීව සාකච්ඡා කරමින් සිට ඇත.

මෙම පියවර නිවේදනය කරමින් ට්‍රම්ප් විසින්ම කරන ලද සටහන, එය පැහැදිලිවම එක්සත් ජනපද න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි ගබඩාව වසර ගණනාවක් තිස්සේ ගොඩනැගීමේ සන්දර්භය තුළ තැබීය. ඔහු ලිවීය, “වෙනත් කිසිදු රටකට වඩා එක්සත් ජනපදය සතුව න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි තිබේ. පැවති ආයුධ සම්පූර්ණයෙන් යාවත්කාලීන කිරීම සහ ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණය කිරීම ඇතුළුව මෙය සාක්ෂාත් කර ගන්නා ලද්දේ මගේ පළමු ධුර කාලය තුළයි.”

“ඊට සමාන පදනමකින් අපගේ න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි අත්හදා බැලීම ආරම්භ කරන ලෙස මම යුද දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට උපදෙස් දී තිබෙනවා. එම ක්‍රියාවලිය වහාම ආරම්භ වේවි”, ඔහු තවදුරටත් පැවසීය.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ සටහන පැවසුවේ කතාවේ කොටසක් පමණකි . ඔහු පුරසාරම් දෙඩූ න්‍යෂ්ටික ගොඩනැගීම ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම ඔබාමා පරිපාලනය යටතේ ආරම්භ කරන ලද අතර එය ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ පළමු ධුර කාලය තුළ, බයිඩන්ගේ ධුර කාලය තුළ සහ දැන් දෙවන ට්‍රම්ප් ධුර කාලය තුළ ද අඛන්ඩව ක්‍රියාත්මක විය. ඇමරිකානු ජනගහනයෙන් අතිමහත් බහුතරයක් නොදන්නා මෙම න්‍යෂ්ටික ගොඩනැගීම, ඩොලර් ට්‍රිලියන 1 කට වඩා වැඩි වියදමක් දරමින්  පූර්ණ ද්විපාර්ශ්වික (ඩිමොක්‍රටික් සහ රිපබ්ලිකන් පක්ෂවල) සහයෝගය ඇතිව දිගටම පැවතුනි.

වසරකට පෙර, නිව් යෝර්ක් ටයිම්ස් “චංචල නව න්‍යෂ්ටික යුගයක් සඳහා නවීන අවි ගබඩාවක්” නිර්මාණය කිරීම හරහා “ඇමරිකාව නැවතත් න්‍යෂ්ටික බවට පත් කිරීම” සඳහා කැප වූ රහස් සැලැස්ම පිළිබඳ පුළුල් විශේෂාංග ප්‍රවෘත්තියක් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරන ලදී.

“ඔබ සබ්මැරීන වෑල්ඩින් කරන හෝ මිසයිල කටාරම් හාරා ඇති ස්ථානයක ජීවත් නොවන්නේ නම්, එය සිදුවන බව ඔබ නොදැන සිටීමට බොහෝ අවස්ථාවක් තිබේ,”ටයිම්ස් ලිවීය. “කොංග්‍රස් මණ්ඩල විභාග සහ මූලෝපා පත්‍රිකා වල හැර, සැලැස්ම ගැන හෝ වියදම් කරන  අති විශාල මුදල ගැන, ෆෙඩරල් රජය ප්‍රසිද්ධියේ  එතරම් කතා කර නැත. සැලකිය යුතු විවාදයක් සිදුවී නොමැත. ඩොලර් බිලියන ගණන් වල  වැඩසටහන් රේඩාර් වලට  යටින්  ගමන් කරයි.”

එම ලිපිය ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කිරීමෙන් පසු වසර තුළ, දැවැන්ත එක්සත් ජනපද න්‍යෂ්ටික ගොඩනැගීම සහ ඒ වටා ඇති නිහඬතාවයේ කුමන්ත්‍රණය යන දෙකම අඛණ්ඩව පැවත ඇත. දෙසැම්බර් මාසයේදී, න්‍යෂ්ටික නවීකරණ උත්සාහයන් සඳහා වාර්තාගත අරමුදල් සම්පාදනයක් හා මානව ඉතිහාසයේ ඕනෑම රටක විශාලතම මිලිටරි අයවැය ද වන ඩොලර් බිලියන 895 ක ජාතික ආරක්ෂක බලය පැවරීමේ පනත (NDAA) කොංග්‍රසය අනුමත කළේය.

ජනවාරි මාසයේදී ට්‍රම්ප් නිවේදනය කළේ එක්සත් ජනපදය “අති නවීන යකඩ මිසයිල ආරක්ෂක පලිහක් (Iron Dome) ඉදිකිරීම වහාම ආරම්භ කරන” බවයි. එහෙත්, ආරක්ෂක පියවරක් වීමට විපරීතව, මිසයිල පලිහ එක්සත් ජනපදය පළිගැනීමේ ක්‍රියාවන්ගෙන් ආරක්ෂා කරනු ඇතැයි  අපේක්ෂා කරන බැවින්, මෙම ඊනියා “ගෝල්ඩන් ඩෝමය” ධවල මන්දිරය පූර්ව-භංග න්‍යෂ්ටික පළමු ප්‍රහාරයකින් අනෙකුත් රටවලට තර්ජනය කිරීමට දිරිගන්වනු ඇත.

එක්සත් ජනපදයේ අඛණ්ඩ න්‍යෂ්ටික ගොඩනැගීමේ කොටසක් ලෙස, ට්‍රම්ප් පරිපාලනය න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි භාවිතය සඳහා ඇති සියලු සීමාවන් ඉවත් කිරීමට උත්සාහ කර ඇත. වඩාත්ම කැපී පෙනෙන දෙය නම්, 2019 අගෝස්තු මාසයේදී–නැවතත්, ට්‍රම්ප් යටතේම–එක්සත් ජනපදය අතරමැදි පරාස න්‍යෂ්ටික බලකා (INF) ගිවිසුමෙන් ඉවත් වීමයි.

2018 ඔක්තෝම්බර් මාසයේදී ට්‍රම්ප් විසින් එක්සත් ජනපදය INF ගිවිසුමෙන් ඉවත් වන බවට කළ නිවේදනයට ප්‍රතිචාර වශයෙන්, රුසියානු ජනාධිපති ව්ලැඩිමීර් පුටින් ප්‍රකාශ කළේ, පොසයිඩන් ලෙස හඳුන්වන දිය යට ඩ්‍රෝන යානයක් සහ බුරෙවෙස්ට්නික් ලෙස හඳුන්වන නව දිගු දුර කෲස් මිසයිලයක් ඇතුළුව නව න්‍යෂ්ටික  (ප්‍රහාර) සැපයුම්  යාන්ත්‍රණ මාලාවක් සංවර්ධනය කිරීම රුසියාව ආරම්භ කරන බවයි.

රුසියාව මෑතකදී එකී පද්ධති දෙකෙහිම න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි නොවන බෙදාහැරීමේ  (ප්‍රහාර)  යාන්ත්‍රණයන් පිළිබඳ පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කළ අතර, එය දිගු කලක් තිස්සේ සැලසුම් කර තිබූ සහ දිගු කලක් සාකච්ඡා කරන ලද එක්සත් ජනපද න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කිරීම නිවේදනය කිරීම සඳහා ට්‍රම්ප් විසින් ප්‍රයෝජනයට ගන්නා ලදී.

INF ගිවිසුමෙන් ඉවත් වීමෙන් පසුව, එක්සත් ජනපදය ගිවිසුම යටතේ කලින් තහනම් කරන ලද න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි, රුසියාවට සහ චීනයට පහර දිය හැකි ස්ථානවල ස්ථානගත කිරීමට පියවර ගෙන තිබේ. පෙන්ටගනය එහි ඉලක්ක ගත ප්‍රහාරක මිසයිලයේ (Precision Strike Missile) පරාසය පුළුල් කර ඇති අතර SLCM-N ලෙස හඳුන්වන නව න්‍යෂ්ටික සන්නද්ධ, මුහුදේ දියත් කරන කෲස් මිසයිලයක් සංවර්ධනය කිරීම සඳහා ඩොලර් මිලියන සිය ගණනක් වැය කර ඇත.

INF ගිවිසුම යටතේ කලින් තහනම් කරන ලද බැලස්ටික් සහ කෲස් මිසයිල සංවර්ධනය කිරීම, රුසියාවේ ගැඹුරු අභ්‍යන්තරයට  නේටෝ නියෝජිත වන  යුක්රේනයේ සෘජු ප්‍රහාර උත්සන්න කිරීම සමඟ ඒකාබද්ධ වී ඇත. මෙම මාසයේ, වෝල් ස්ට්‍රීට් ජර්නලය,“බටහිර සහචරයින් විසින් සපයන ලද සමහර  දිගු දුර මිසයිල යුක්රේනය භාවිතා කිරීම සඳහා පනවා තිබූ ප්‍රධාන සීමාවක් ට්‍රම්ප් පරිපාලනය ඉවත් කර ඇත” යනුවෙන් වාර්තා කල අතර, ඒ අනුව මේ මාසයේ දකුණු රුසියාවේ බ්‍රයන්ස්ක් නගරයට එක්සත් රාජධානිය විසින් සපයන ලද ස්ටෝම් ෂැඩෝ මිසයිල භාවිතා කරමින් ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල විය.

මේ මස මුලදී, ට්‍රම්ප් තහවුරු කළේ යුක්රේනයට ටොමාහෝක් මිසයිල යැවීම ගැන සලකා බලන බවයි. ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ තර්ජනයට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වමින් හිටපු රුසියානු ජනාධිපති දිමිත්‍රි මෙඩ්විඩෙව් නිරීක්ෂණය කළේ, “ගුවනේදී න්‍යෂ්ටික ටොමාහෝක් මිසයිලයක් සාම්ප්‍රදායික එවැන්නකින්  වෙන්කර හඳුනා ගැනීමට නොහැකි” බවයි. ටොම්හෝක් මිසයිලවලට දිගු කලක් තිස්සේ න්‍යෂ්ටික යුධ ශීර්ෂ රැගෙන යාමේ හැකියාව තිබුණි.

රුසියානු සහ චීන දේශසීමා වල කෙටි දුර න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි ස්ථානගත කිරීම, නේටෝව විසින් සපයන ලද දිගු දුර අවි රුසියානු නගරවලට ප්‍රහාර එල්ල කිරීම සඳහා උසි ගැන්වීම සහ න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කිරීම යන මේවා අතර, මුළු ලෝකයම න්‍යෂ්ටික යුද්ධයක කොකා ගස්සන කෙස් ගසක අද්දරට ගෙන යනු ඇත.

නේටෝවේ අර්ධ-නිල සහචර යුක්රේනයෙන් “සාම්ප්‍රදායික” මිසයිලයක් වෙඩි තබන ඕනෑම අවස්ථාවක, නැතහොත්,  ඊනියා ” වියරු මිනිසා න්‍යායේ” ලොව ප්‍රමුඛතම වෘත්තිකයා වන ට්‍රම්ප් විසින් නියෝග කරන ලද එක්සත් ජනපදයේ අනපේක්ෂිත න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීමක් සිදු කරන සෑම අවස්ථාවකම රුසියාවේ සහ චීනයේ සැලසුම්කරුවන් තමන්ගෙන්ම මෙසේ අසනු ඇත: “අපි න්‍යෂ්ටික ප්‍රහාරයකට ලක්ව සිටිත්ද?”

රුසියාව සහ චීනය යටපත් කර ගැනීම සඳහා ගණන් බලමින් එක්සත් ජනපදය අවදානම් සීමාවට යෑම,  අසීමාන්තික ප්‍රතිවිපාක සහිත දැවැන්ත යුද උත්සන්නියේ සර්පිලයක් අවුලුවාලිය හැකිය.

අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී මිලිටරිවාදයේ නැගීම එක්සත් ජනපදයේ කම්කරු පන්තියට එල්ල වන ප්‍රහාරය සමඟ වෙන්කළ නොහැකි සේ බැඳී පවතී. එක්සත් ජනපදය න්‍යෂ්ටික අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කරන බවට ට්‍රම්ප් කළ නිවේදනය, ආහාර මුද්දර සඳහා අරමුදල් සැපයීම අවසන් කිරීමට නියමිත දින කිහිපයකට පෙර පැමිණ ඇති අතර, එමඟින් ස්තුති දීමේ නිවාඩුවට (Thanksgiving) සහ නත්තල් නිවාඩුවට ආසන්න පෙරාතුවේ  ඇමරිකානුවන් දස මිලියන සංඛ්‍යාත පිරිසකට අත්‍යවශ්‍ය ජීවනාලියක් අහිමි කෙරේ.

මේ දෙක අතර සෘජු සම්බන්ධයක් තිබේ. මෙම මාසයේ ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරන ලද ප්‍රකාශයක, ඩිමොක්‍රටික් පක්ෂයට පක්ෂපාත බෲකින්ස් ආයතනය, ඩිමොක්‍රටික් සහ රිපබ්ලිකන් පක්ෂ දෙකෙන්ම සහාය දක්වන ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් වෙනුවෙන් කතා කරමින්, “යොදා ගත හැකි සියලුම රාජ්‍ය සහ පෞද්ගලික මෙවලම් උපයෝගී කර ගන්නා ඔරොත්තු දීමේ සමස්ත සමාජ මූලෝපායක්: පූර්ණ යුද්ධ යුගයක් සඳහා පූර්ණ ආරක්ෂාව” ඉල්ලා සිටියේය.

දෙවන ලෝක යුද්ධ සමයේදී ජර්මානු හමුදා නායකත්වය විසින් පුරෝගාමී කරන ලද්දා වූ සහ නාසි පාලන තන්ත්‍රය යටතේ රාජ්‍ය මූලධර්මය ලෙස දිගටම පැවතියා වූ “පූර්ණ යුද්ධයේ” මූලධර්මය, ජාතික මිලිටරි සාර්ථකත්වයේ නාමයෙන් කම්කරු පන්තියෙන් “කැපකිරීම” ඉල්ලා සිටිමින්, සමස්ත සමාජයම යුධ ප්‍රයත්නයට යටත් කරන ලදී.

“පූර්ණ යුද්ධයේ” මූලධර්මය යටතේ, නාසි ජර්මනියේ නායකයින් නැගෙනහිර යුරෝපය පුරා සමූලඝාතන යුද්ධයක් දියත් කළාක් මෙන් නිසැකවම ජර්මනියේ මහජනතාව මත ව්‍යසනයක් ගෙන ආහ. දැන්, සමස්තයක් ලෙස ඇමරිකානු කතිපයාධිකාරය වෙනුවෙන් කතා කරන ට්‍රම්ප්, නාසි තන්ත්‍රය, එක්සත් ජනපදයේ ඒකාධිපතිත්වයට පමණක් නොව, ලොව පුරා මිලිටරි ප්‍රචණ්ඩත්වයට ආදර්ශයක් ලෙස දකී.

පාලක පන්තිය, තම රට තුළ කම්කරු පන්තියට එල්ල කරන ප්‍රහාරය විදේශයන්හි මිලිටරි උත්සන්න කිරීම සමඟ බද්ධ කරයි. කම්කරු පන්තිය තම සමාජ හා ආර්ථික අයිතීන් ආරක්ෂා කිරීම අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී යුද්ධයට එරෙහි අරගලය සමඟ ඒකාබද්ධ කිරීමෙන් ප්‍රතිචාර දැක්විය යුතුය. මෙම මස මුලදී පැවති “රජුන් එපා” රැලිය ට්‍රම්ප් පරිපාලනයේ ඒකාධිපතිත්වය සහ කප්පාදු ප්‍රතිපත්තිවලට මහා ජන විරෝධයක් පවතින බව පෙන්නුම් කළේය. අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී යුද්ධයට එරෙහි සටන ධනවාදයට එරෙහි සහ සමාජවාදය සඳහා වන සටනට බද්ධ කරන කම්කරු පන්තියේ ව්‍යාපාරයක් ලෙස මෙම විරුද්ධත්වය වර්ධනය කළ යුතුය.

ට්‍රම්ප් එක්සත් ජනපද න්‍යෂ්ටික අවි අත්හදා බැලීම් නැවත ආරම්භ කරන බව නිවේදනය කරයි Read More »

War ship

2030 යුරෝපයේ ආරක්ෂක මාර්ග සිතියම ඒකාධිපතිත්වයට සහ ගෝලීය යුද්ධයට පදනම දමයි

ජොහැන්නස් ස්ටර්න් විසිනි. 

මෙහි පලවන්නේ ලෝක සමාජවාදී වෙබ් අඩවියේ (ලෝසවෙඅ) 2025 ඔක්තෝම්බර් 25 දින ‘Europe’s defence roadmap 2030 lays the groundwork for dictatorship and global warයන හිසින් පලවූ ජොහැන්නස් ස්ටර්න් විසින් ලියන ලද ඉදිරිදර්ශන ලිපියේ සිංහල පරිවර්තනය යි.

War ship
2003 මාර්තු 23 වන දින මධ්‍යධරණී මුහුදේ ක්‍රියාත්මක වන USS කේප් ශාන්ත ජෝර්ජ් (CG 71) නියෙමු මිසයිල නෞකාවෙන් ටොමාහෝක් ගොඩබිම් ප්‍රහාරක මිසයිලයක් (TLAM) දියත් කරන අයුරු.[AP ඡායාරූප/බුද්ධි විශේෂඥ 1 වන කෙනත් මෝල්/එක්සත් ජනපද නාවික හමුදාව]

පසුගිය දිනවල සිදුවීම් රුසියාවට එරෙහි අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී මිලිටරි උත්සන්න කිරීමේ සහ තුන්වන ලෝක යුද්ධයකට සූදානම් වීමේ නව අවධියක් සනිටුහන් කරයි. බ්‍රහස්පතින්දා බ්‍රසල්ස් හි පැවති යුරෝපීය කවුන්සිලයේ රැස්වීම් සහ සිකුරාදා ලන්ඩනයේ පැවති ඊනියා “කැමැත්ත ඇත්තන්ගේ සන්ධානය” සාමාන්‍ය රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රික රැස්වීම් නොව යුද සමුළු විය. ඔවුහු එක්ව නව සම්බාධක, යුක්රේනයට තවදුරටත් මිලිටරි ආධාර සහ සමස්ත මහාද්වීපයම මිලිටරිකරණය කිරීම සඳහා වන පස් අවුරුදු සැලැස්මක් සකස් කරන “ආරක්ෂක සූදානම මාර්ග සිතියම 2030” අනුමත කළහ.

ඒ සමඟම, වොෂින්ටනය එහි සෘජු මැදිහත්වීම තීව්‍ර කළේය. ට්‍රම්ප් පරිපාලනය යුක්රේනයට බටහිර රටවල් විසින් සපයන ලද දිගු දුර මිසයිල භාවිතා කිරීම සඳහා පනවා තිබූ ප්‍රධාන සීමාවන් ඉවත් කිරිම මගින්, කියෙව්ට රුසියානු භූමියේ ගැඹුරට පහර දීමට හැකියාව ඇති කළේය. අඟහරුවාදා, යුක්රේනය බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය සැපයූ ස්ටෝම්  ෂැඩෝ කෲස් මිසයිලයක් භාවිතා කර බ්‍රයන්ස්ක් හි පුපුරණ ද්‍රව්‍ය සහ රොකට් ඉන්ධන නිපදවන කම්හලකට ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල කළේය. යුක්රේන පොදු කාර්ය මණ්ඩලය (general staff) “සාර්ථක ප්‍රහාරය” සැමරූහ. එවැනි මෙහෙයුම් නේටෝ බලවතුන් සහ රුසියාව අතර විවෘත ගැටුමක් අවුලුවාලීමේ අවදානමක් ඇති කරන අතර එය වේගයෙන් න්‍යෂ්ටික සටනක් දක්වා සර්පිලාකාර විය හැකිය.

එක්සත් ජනපදය සහ එහි යුරෝපීය සහචරයෝ හිතාමතාම ගැටුම උත්සන්න කරමින් සිටිති. වොෂින්ටනය සහ ලන්ඩන් යන දෙපිරසම රුසියාවේ විශාලතම තෙල් හා ගෑස් නිෂ්පාදකයින් වන රොස්නෙෆ්ට් සහ ලුකොයිල්ට (Rosneft, Lukoil) එරෙහිව නව සම්බාධක ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කළ අතර යුරෝපීය සංගමය තමන්ගේම ආර්ථික යුද්ධය දැඩි කිරීමට එකඟ විය. බ්‍රසල්ස් සමුළුවේදී ද්විත්ව-භාවිත භාණ්ඩ සඳහා අපනයන තහනම් පුළුල් කිරීමට, යුරෝපීය ප්‍රාග්ධන වෙළඳපොළට රුසියානු ප්‍රවේශය සීමා කිරීමට, රුසියානු “සෙවණැලි නැව් කණ්ඩායමේ (shadow fleet)” නැව් 117 කට යුරෝපා සංගම් වරායන් තහනම් කිරීමට සහ රුසියානු රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රිකයින්ට නව සංචාරක සහ මූල්‍ය සීමාවන් පැනවීමට තීරණය විය. කලින් සැලසුම් කළ කාල සීමාවන්ට වඩා වසරකට පෙර–2027 වන විට–රුසියානු ද්‍රව ස්වාභාවික ගෑස් (LNG) ආනයනය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම තහනම් කරනු ඇත.

ඊටත් වඩා ප්‍රකෝපකාරී වන්නේ යුක්‍රේනයට ආයුධ සඳහා අරමුදල් සැපයීම පිණිස රුසියානු මහ බැංකුවේ සිර කළ වත්කම් අත්පත් කර ගෙන ප්‍රති-අරමුණුගත කිරීමට යුරෝපා සංගමය සැලසුම් කිරීමයි. බෙල්ජියම නීතිමය විරෝධතා මතු කළද, යුරෝපීය කවුන්සිලය කොමිසමට උපදෙස් දුන්නේ “හැකි ඉක්මනින් යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලෙසයි.” මෙය ජාත්‍යන්තර සොරකමකට වඩා අඩු දෙයක් නොවේ–එය බටහිර අවශ්‍යතා සමඟ ගැටෙන්නේ නම් තම  සංචිත ආරක්ෂිත නොවන බව පෘථිවියේ සෑම ජාතියකටම සංඥා කරන අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී අත්පත් කර ගැනීමකි.

යුක්‍රේනය පිළිබඳ යුරෝපීය කවුන්සිලයේ ප්‍රකාශය, 2022 සිට යුරෝපා සංගමය දැනටමත් යුරෝ බිලියන 177.5 ක් ලබා දී ඇති බවත්, “2026–2027 සඳහා එහි මිලිටරි සහ ආරක්ෂක කටයුතු ඇතුළුව යුක්‍රේනයේ හදිසි මූල්‍ය අවශ්‍යතා සපුරාලීමට කැපවී සිටින බවත්” පුරසාරම් දොඩයි. තවත් බිලියන සිය ගණනක් අනුමත කෙරෙනු ඇත.

සමුළුවට සමගාමීව ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලද, ඊනියා ආරක්ෂක සූදානම මාර්ග සිතියම 2030,  මෙම මුදල් කුමක් සඳහාද යන්න සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම පැහැදිලි කරයි. එය පහත ප්‍රකාශයෙන් ආරම්භ වේ:

“ආරක්ෂක සූදානම යනු නවීන යුද්ධ සඳහා අවශ්‍ය හැකියාවන් වර්ධනය කිරීම සහ අත්පත් කර ගැනීමයි. එහි තේරුම යුරෝපයට උපායමාර්ගික වාසියක් සහ අවශ්‍ය ස්වාධීනත්වය ලබා දෙන ආරක්ෂක කාර්මික පදනමක් ඇති බව සහතික කිරීමයි. තවද, එහි තේරුම තීරණාත්මක කාලවලදී අති නවීන නවෝත්පාදනයන් සහ වේගවත්, මහා පරිමාණ නිෂ්පාදනයක් ලබා දීමට සූදානම් වීමයි.”

මෙය යුරෝපීය යුද ආර්ථිකයක් සඳහා මහා සැලැස්මකි–මහා පරිමාණ අවි ආයුධ සන්නද්ධ කිරීම සඳහා කර්මාන්ත, මූල්‍ය සහ තාක්‍ෂණය සම්බන්ධීකරණය කරන ලද බලමුලු ගැන්වීමකි.  මාර්ග සිතියම, “උත්සාහයන්  ඉහළ මට්ටමකට ගෙන ඒමේ සහ වේගවත් කිරීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවය, අද දින වැඩිවන අන්තරායන් පිළිබිඹු කරයි,” ලෙස සඳහන් කරයි.

රුසියාව ප්‍රධාන සතුරා ලෙස හඳුනාගෙන ඇති අතර එය “දැකිය හැකි අනාගතය සඳහා යුරෝපීය ආරක්ෂාවට නිරන්තර තර්ජනයක්” ලෙස කියාපාන නමුත් ලේඛනයේ විෂය පථය ගෝලීය වේ:

“යුරෝපයේ සූදානම, 360° ප්‍රවේශයක් සහිත පුළුල් ගෝලීය සන්දර්භය තුළ මුල් බැස ගත යුතුය. …ගාසා තීරයේ සහ මැද පෙරදිග සිට අප්‍රිකාවේ සැඟවුණු හෝ විවෘත ගැටුම් කිහිපයක් දක්වා, ආසියා-පැසිෆික් කලාපයේ වැඩිවන ආතතීන්ගේ සිට ආක්ටික් දක්වා ආදී ලෝකයේ අනෙකුත් ප්‍රදේශවලින් එල්ලවන තර්ජනවලට අපට අන්ධ විය නොහැක.”

වෙනත් වචන වලින් කිවහොත්, යුරෝපා සංගමය එක්සත් ජනපදයෙන් ස්වාධීනව තම ආර්ථික හා භූ මූලෝපායික අවශ්‍යතා ඉටු කර ගැනීම සඳහා ලෝක ව්‍යාප්ත යුද්ධයකට සූදානම් වෙමින් සිටී. එය පැහැදිලිවම සඳහන් කරන්නේ, “සාම්ප්‍රදායික සහචරයින් සහ හවුල්කරුවන් ලෝකයේ අනෙකුත් කලාප වෙත තම අවධානය යොමු කරමින් සිටින” බවත් “යුද්ධයේ වෙනස්වන ස්වභාවයට අනුකූලව, යුරෝපයේ ආරක්ෂක ඉරියව්ව සහ හැකියාවන් … හෙට දවසේ යුධ පිටි සඳහා සූදානම් කළ යුතු” බවත්ය.

මාර්ග සිතියම 1930 ගණන්වල ප්‍රති-සන්නද්ධ කිරීමේ වැඩසටහන් සමඟ තරඟකාරීවන මට්ටමේ ප්‍රමාණාත්මක ඉලක්ක නියම කරයි. එය 2021 දී යුරෝ බිලියන 218 සිට 2025 දී යුරෝ බිලියන 392 දක්වා යුරෝපීය ආරක්ෂක වියදම් ඉහළ යාම සමරන අතර තවදුරටත් වේගවත් කිරීමක් ඉල්ලා සිටී. “ReArm Europe” (යුරෝපය  ප්‍රතිසන්නද්ධ කරමු) න්‍යාය පත්‍රය යටතේ, SAFE මෙවලම වැනි නව අරමුදල් යාන්ත්‍රණ හරහා අවි ආයුධ සඳහා යුරෝ බිලියන 800 ක් දක්වා බලමුලු ගන්වනු ලැබේ. 2035 වන විට දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතයෙන් සියයට 3.5 ක ආරක්ෂක වියදම් ඉලක්කයක් කරා ළඟා වීමට ජුනි මස නේටෝ සමුළුවේදී කරන ලද කැපවීම් සඳහා වාර්ෂිකව අවම වශයෙන් වසරකට අමතර යුරෝ බිලියන 288 ක් අවශ්‍ය වේ.

මෙම අතිවිශාල මුදල් සම්භාරයට මුදල් යෙදවිය හැක්කේ කුරිරු කප්පාදු, සමාජ වැඩසටහන් විනාශ කිරීම සහ මහජන අරමුදල් කොල්ලකෑම හරහා පමණි. “ආරක්ෂක සූදානම” සඳහා මුදල් සහ ආයුධ පමණක් නොව යුද්ධය සඳහා සමස්ත මහාද්වීපයම ප්‍රතිසංවිධානය කිරීම අවශ්‍ය බව ලේඛනය පැහැදිලි කරයි. “යුරෝපා සංගමය පුරා හමුදා සංචලන ප්‍රදේශයක් කරා” වගන්තිය යටතේ එය යෝජනා කරන්නේ:

“2027 අවසානය වන විට, නේටෝව සමඟ සමීප සම්බන්ධීකරණයෙන්, සංගමය පුරා හමුදා සහ හමුදා උපකරණ බාධාවකින් තොරව ප්‍රවාහනය සහතික කරන, සංගත  කළ නීති සහ ක්‍රියා පටිපාටි, ගොඩබිම් කොරිඩෝ, ගුවන්තොටුපළ, වරාය සහ ආධාරක අංග ජාලයක් සහිත, යුරෝපා සංගමය පුරා හමුදා සංචලන ප්‍රදේශයක් පිහිටුවනු ඇත.”

ඉලක්කය වන්නේ යුරෝපය තනි යුධ පිටියක් බවට පරිවර්තනය කිරීමයි–එනම්, හමුදා සහ සන්නාහ බෝල්ටික් සිට කළු මුහුද දක්වා නිදහසේ ගමන් කළ හැකි ඒකාබද්ධ සැපයුම් කලාපයක් සැකසීමයි. සිවිල් යටිතල පහසුකම් මිලිටරි අවශ්‍යතා සඳහා යටත් කරනු ලැබේ.  දස දහස් ගණනක් නේටෝ භටයින් චලනය කරමින් යුද විරෝධී විරෝධතාකරුවන්ට එරෙහිව සොල්දාදුවන් යෙදවීම සිදු කළ හැම්බර්ග්හි, රෙඩ් ස්ටෝම් බ්‍රාවෝ වැනි අභ්‍යාස, මෙම මිලිටරිකරණයේ දේශීය මානය දැනටමත් අපේක්ෂා කරයි: එනම් අභ්‍යන්තර විරුද්ධත්වය මර්දනය කිරීම යි.

මෙම පරිවර්තනයේ පෙරමුණේ සිටින්නේ ජර්මනියයි.  හරිත පක්ෂයේ  සහ වාම පක්ෂයේ  සහාය ඇතිව, පාලක සන්ධානය ප්‍රති-සන්නද්ධ කිරීම සඳහා යුරෝ ට්‍රිලියනයක රාමුවක් නිර්මාණය කර ඇත. 2025 ආරක්ෂක අයවැය යුරෝ බිලියන 86.5 ක් වන අතර එය දෙවන ලෝක යුද්ධය අවසන් වීමෙන් පසු ඕනෑම අවස්ථාවකට වඩා වැඩි වේ. 2029 වන විට යුරෝ බිලියන 150 කට වඩා වැඩි වන මෙම වියදම දළ වශයෙන් දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතයෙන් සියයට 3.5 කි.  “මිලිටරි සූදානම”සඳහා යටිතල පහසුකම් වියදම් ඇතුළත් කළහොත්, යුද්ධයට අදාළ මුළු වියදම් දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතයෙන් සියයට 5 ක් දක්වා ඉහල යනු ඇති අතර, එය වාර්ෂිකව යුරෝ බිලියන 215 ක් පමණ වේ.

නව හමුදා සහ සිවිල් තනතුරු දස දහස් ගණනක් නිර්මාණය වෙමින් පවතින අතර අනිවාර්ය හමුදා බඳවා ගැනීම නැවත ස්ථාපිත කෙරෙනු ඇත. ප්‍රහාරක ජෙට් යානා, ප්‍රවාහන හෙලිකොප්ටර්, නව යුධ ටැංකි, සන්නද්ධ වාහන, යුද නැව්, ඩ්‍රෝන යානා, මිසයිල පද්ධති සහ ඒ සඳහා කැපවූ අභ්‍යවකාශ විධානයක් (මූලස්ථානයක්) පවා නිර්මාණය කිරීම සඳහා බිලියන ගණනක් මුදල් හරවා ඇත. චාන්සලර් ෆ්‍රෙඩ්රික් මර්ස් ජර්මනිය “යුරෝපයේ ශක්තිමත්ම සාම්ප්‍රදායික හමුදාව” බවට පත් කිරීමේ තම ඉලක්කය විවෘතව ප්‍රකාශ කර තිබේ.

මෙම ප්‍රතිපත්ති, යලි සන්නද්ධ කිරීම සහ ලෝක බලය සඳහා වූ තල්ලුව මගින් ෆැසිස්ට් තන්ත්‍රයක් ස්ථාපනය කිරීම, ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී අයිතිවාසිකම් විනාශ කිරීම සහ කම්කරු පන්තිය මර්දනය කිරීම සිදු කළ, 1930 ගනන්වල ජර්මානු අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයේ සූදානම සිහිපත් කරයි. එම තර්කනය නැවතත් තහවුරු වෙමින් පවතී. යුරෝපය පුරා, පාලක ප්‍රභූන් සමාජ කෝපය මැඩපැවැත්වීමට සහ යුද්ධයට සූදානම් වීමට ෆැසිස්ට් බලවේග–බ්‍රිතාන්‍යයේ ෆරාජ්, ප්‍රංශයේ ල පෙන්, ඉතාලියේ මෙලෝනි සහ ජර්මනියේ ඒඑෆ්ඩී–වගා කරමින් සිටිති.

වෛෂයික ප්‍රවණතා නිසැකවම පැහැදිලිය. යුරෝපා සංගමය, නේටෝව සහ අවි කර්මාන්තය ඒකාබද්ධ යුද යාන්ත්‍රණයකට බද්ධ කිරීම ඒකාධිපති පාලනයක් කරා හැරීම සමඟ අත්වැල් බැඳගනී. ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී අයිතිවාසිකම්වලට පහර දීම, ගාසා සංහාරයට එරෙහි විරෝධතා අපරාධකරණය කිරීම සහ පොලිස් බලකායන් මිලිටරිකරණය කිරීම යන සියල්ල මහජන විරෝධයට පාලක පන්තියේ බිය පිළිබිඹු කරයි.

අධිරාජ්‍යවාදය යුද්ධයට තල්ලු කරන එම ප්‍රතිවිරෝධතාම–සියල්ලටත් වඩා ධනේශ්වර ක්‍රමයේ ගැඹුරු අර්බුදය–විප්ලවවාදී නැගිටීම් සඳහා කොන්දේසි ද ඇති කරයි. ප්‍රති-සන්නද්ධ කිරීම, ජීවන තත්වයන් විනාශ කිරීම සහ  නිරන්තරයෙන් වර්ධනය වන න්‍යෂ්ටික සමූලඝාතනයේ අනතුර සඳහා මුදල් යෙදවීම සඳහා ධනය විශාල වශයෙන් නැවත වෙන් කිරීම කම්කරු පන්තිය පුරා ප්‍රතිරෝධය අවුස්සනු ඇත. එක්සත් ජනපදයේ, ඔක්තෝබර් 18 වන දින ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ ෆැසිස්ට් ප්‍රතිපත්තිවලට එරෙහි “රජුන් එපා” විරෝධතාවලට මිලියන 7 කට වැඩි පිරිසක් එක් වූහ. යුරෝපයේ අනෙකුත් ස්ථාන අතර, ග්‍රීසිය, බෙල්ජියම, ඉතාලිය, නෙදර්ලන්තය සහ ප්‍රංශය හි කප්පාදු පියවරයන්ට සහ මිලිටරිවාදයට එරෙහිව වැඩවර්ජන සහ විරෝධතා පුපුරා ගොස් ඇත.  මේවා පන්ති අරගලයේ පුපුරන සුලු ගෝලීය පුනර්ජීවනයක සලකුණු ය.

නමුත් ස්වයංසිද්ධ විරුද්ධත්වය ප්‍රමාණවත් නොවේ. යුද්ධයට සහ ආඥාදායකත්වයට එරෙහි සටන, ඒවායේ මූල හේතුවට, එනම් ධනේශ්වර ක්‍රමයටම එරෙහි අරගලයට සම්බන්ධ කරන සවිඥානික දේශපාලන වැඩපිළිවෙලකින් එය සන්නද්ධ විය යුතුය. හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කමිටුවවේ (හජාජාක)”සමාජවාදය සහ යුද්ධයට එරෙහි සටන”-2016 ප්‍රකාශය දැන් දැවෙන හදිසිතාවයක් අත්කර ගන්නා මූලධර්ම ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත:

  • යුද්ධයට එරෙහි අරගලය, සමාජයේ මහා විප්ලවවාදී බලවේගය වන කම්කරු පන්තිය මත පදනම් විය යුතු අතර, ජනගහනයේ සියලු ප්‍රගතිශීලී කොටස් කම්කරු පන්තිය පිටුපස එක්සත් කළ යුතුය.
  • නව යුද විරෝධී ව්‍යාපාරය ධනවාදී විරෝධී සහ සමාජවාදී විය යුතුය, මන්ද, මූල්‍ය ප්‍රාග්ධනයේ ආඥාදායකත්වය අවසන් කිරීමට සහ මිලිටරිවාදයේ සහ යුද්ධයේ මූලික හේතුව වන ආර්ථික ක්‍රමය අවසන් කිරීමට කරන සටනකින් තොරව යුද්ධයට එරෙහි බරපතල අරගලයක් තිබිය නොහැකි බැවිනි.
  • එබැවින්, නව යුද විරෝධී ව්‍යාපාරය, අවශ්‍යයෙන්ම, ධනපති පන්තියේ සියලුම දේශපාලන පක්ෂ සහ සංවිධානවලින් සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම සහ නිසැකවම ස්වාධීන විය යුතු අතර ඒවාට සතුරු විය යුතුය.
  • නව යුද විරෝධී ව්‍යාපාරය, සියල්ලටත් වඩා, ජාත්‍යන්තර විය යුතු අතර, අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයට එරෙහි ඒකාබද්ධ ගෝලීය අරගලයක් තුළ කම්කරු පන්තියේ දැවැන්ත බලය බලමුලු ගැන්විය යුතුය.

යුරෝපය පුරා සහ ජාත්‍යන්තරව කම්කරුවන්, තරුණයින් සහ බුද්ධිමතුන් [oppressed middle class] මුහුණ දෙන කර්තව්‍යය පැහැදිලිය: සෑම වැඩබිමකම සහ අසල්වැසි ප්‍රදේශයකම ස්වාධීන ක්‍රියාකාරී කමිටු ගොඩනැගීම, ඔවුන්ගේ අරගල දේශසීමා හරහා සම්බන්ධ කිරීම සහ සමාජවාදය සඳහා සටනේදී සවිඥානික විප්ලවවාදී නායකත්වයක්–හතරවන ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ ජාත්‍යන්තරයේ කමිටුවේ කොටස් ලෙස සමාජවාදී සමානතා පක්ෂ–වර්ධනය කිරීම. ධනේශ්වර ක්‍රමය පෙරලා දමා, පෘථිවියේ සම්පත් ලාභය සඳහා නොව තාර්කිකව සහ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදීව මානව අවශ්‍යතා සඳහා භාවිතා කරන සමාජවාදී ලෝක සමූහාණ්ඩුවක කොටසක් ලෙස යුරෝපීය එක්සත් සමාජවාදී රාජ්‍යයක් මගින් එය ප්‍රතිස්ථාපනය කිරීමෙන් පමණක්, මානව වර්ගයාට ලෝක යුද්ධයේ ව්‍යසනය වළක්වා ගත හැකිය.

2030 යුරෝපයේ ආරක්ෂක මාර්ග සිතියම ඒකාධිපතිත්වයට සහ ගෝලීය යුද්ධයට පදනම දමයි Read More »

Webina

Nazism, big business and the working class: Historical experience and political lessons

This webinar was originally published in the World Socialist Web Site on 21 October 2025.

Nazism, big business and the working class: Historical experience and political lessons

On October 16, 2025, the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) hosted a webinar examining the historical relationship between Nazism, big business and the working class—a discussion with urgent contemporary relevance. 

The discussion was chaired by David North, chairperson of the International Editorial Board of the WSWS and of the Socialist Equality Party in the United States. He was joined by three distinguished historians: David Abraham, professor emeritus of law at the University of Miami and author of The Collapse of the Weimar Republic: Political Economy and Crisis; Jacques Pauwels, Canadian historian and author of Big Business and Hitler; and Mario Kessler, senior fellow at the Centre for Contemporary History in Potsdam, Germany, whose scholarship focuses on the German Communist Party and European labor movements.

The webinar opened with North recounting the vicious academic campaign that destroyed Abraham’s career as a historian in the 1980s. After publishing his Marxist analysis of how conflicts within German capitalism facilitated Hitler’s rise, Abraham faced attacks from conservative historians Gerald Feldman and Henry Ashby Turner, who accused him of fraud. Abraham explained that the attack stemmed from “ideological animus, personal pique, and intellectual know-nothingism.”

In the discussion, Jacques Pauwels attacked the claim that Hitler’s rise was accidental or unconnected to capitalist interests. “Hitler’s so-called capture of power was merely a transfer or surrender of power,” he stated. “Without the financial and other support of industry and finance, in other words, big business, the rest of the German power elite, Hitler could never have risen to supremacy.” Pauwels described fascism as “the stick of capitalism, not to be used at all times, but certainly always ready behind the door.”

Mario Kessler addressed Hitler’s mobilization of the middle classes while preventing their left-wing radicalization toward socialism. He noted that the Nazi Party “never succeeded in making consistent inroads into the working class” and “never achieved an absolute majority of the votes” in any Weimar election. Hitler’s function was to “collect the votes of the unemployed people, the resentment of all who considered themselves losers of what was called the system.” Kessler stressed that “before Hitler and the German fascists could annihilate the Jews, they had to destroy the German and European labor movement.”

Pauwels demolished the myth that Hitler improved workers’ living conditions, documenting how “the German workers’ real wages fell dramatically under Nazi rule while corporate profits soared.” He revealed that work accidents and illnesses increased from 930,000 cases in 1933 to 2.2 million in 1939, calling Nazi policy “a high profit, low wage kind of policy.” The first concentration camp at Dachau was established not primarily for Jews but because “regular prisons were full of political prisoners, mostly social democrats and communists.”

The discussion then turned to contemporary parallels. North drew explicit connections between Weimar’s collapse and America’s current trajectory under the fascistic Trump administration, noting gold’s rise from $35 per ounce in 1971 to over $4,000 today as an “objective indication of a real crisis of the American economic system.” Abraham described the emerging alliance of “old right-wingers in the fossil fuel industry” with “anarcho-libertarians” from Silicon Valley, noting that Peter Thiel recently gave lectures invoking Carl Schmitt, the Nazi legal theorist, while identifying workers, leftists, minorities, and environmentalists as civilization’s “blockage,” which Abraham described as “a kind of new Judeo-Bolsheviks.”

North posed a critical question: “Do objective conditions create the possibility for a revolutionary orientation? Is fascism inevitable?” He argued that the same contradictions driving reaction also create revolutionary potential, citing how World War I produced both catastrophe and the October Revolution.

Christoph Vandreier, chairman of the Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei in Germany, addressed the rehabilitation of Hitler and the Nazis within German academia. He described how historian Jörg Baberowski declared in Der Spiegel that “Hitler was not cruel” and “was not a psychopath,” claiming the Holocaust “was not essentially different from shootings during the civil war in Russia.” Vandreier noted that “Baberowski was supported by almost the entire academia in Germany” and that such positions “are part of the mainstream” today, coinciding with Germany’s trillion-euro rearmament program.

The historians agreed that the struggle against historical falsification is inseparable from political struggle. Pauwels emphasized that “history is subversive” and that “the powers that be don’t really want us to know how we got into this trouble.” Abraham noted a modest revival of political economy studies after decades in which “the right captured Washington, the left captured the English department.”

North concluded by emphasizing the persistence of the same fundamental contradictions: “We are not only talking about the past, but we’re really discussing the present. The same issues, the same social forces are present today.” He predicted an “explosive turn by the working class and the most advanced sections of young people and workers toward Marxism, which is the only theoretical framework for which one can understand objective reality and on that basis build a revolutionary movement.”

Links to purchase literature from Mehring Books:

Nazism, big business and the working class: Historical experience and political lessons Read More »

Doing a

Former Kenyan prime minister Raila Odinga dies aged 80

By Kipchumba Ochieng.

This article was originally published in the World Socialist Web Site on 16 October 2025.

Few figures have done more to derail and contain the revolutionary strivings of Kenya’s oppressed masses than Raila Odinga. His death on Wednesday ends the long political career of a man who, for more than four decades, served as a central pillar of capitalist rule and imperialist domination in Kenya. Whether as opposition leader, cabinet minister, or prime minister, Odinga played the role of political fixer, channelling mass protests against inequality, corruption, and repression into the dead end of constitutional reform and imperialist-backed “national unity” coalitions.

Born in 1945 in Maseno, western Kenya, Odinga was the son of Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, Kenya’s first vice president after independence and a co-founder of the Kenya African National Union (KANU) alongside Jomo Kenyatta, the country’s first president. KANU struck a deal with British imperialism and ruled a de facto one-party state for over three decades.

Doing a
Raila Odinga in 2012 [Photo by CSIS / Flickr / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0]

In the early years after political independence, Jaramogi Odinga emerged as the leading figure of KANU’s left wing. Amid mass support for socialism among workers and the rural masses, Odinga sought to secure a base, advancing a programme of state-driven capitalist economic development within the national boundaries imposed by colonialism, the seizure of European settler farms without compensation and the rapid Africanisation of the civil service and public-sector jobs, as he explained in his book Not Yet Uhuru [Not Yet Freedom] (1967). These were measures to be carried out by a capitalist government leveraging close ties with the counterrevolutionary Soviet bureaucracy, not by the working class in alliance with the rural masses. 

Kenyatta crushed this opposition, banning Odinga’s attempts to launch a new party, the Kenya People’s Union (KPU), and placing Odinga under house arrest.

In the decades after independence, Kenya’s new elite enriched itself through vast land grabs financed by Western loans, buying up former settler estates at the expense of the rural poor while looting state resources and deepening military and economic ties with British and American imperialism that continue to this day. As with other post-colonial African independence governments, Kenya’s experience exposed the organic incapacity of Africa’s bourgeois nationalists to realise the aspirations of the African masses for freedom from foreign domination, democracy, and social justice.

Raila Odinga’s political ascent was built on his father’s legacy as the nominal left opposition to Kenyatta and his successor Daniel arap Moi. Educated in Stalinist East Germany as a mechanical engineer, he returned to a Kenya that his father had helped build to join the ranks of the new ruling class, expanding the family’s business empire in energy, construction, and media. By the time of his death, his fortune was estimated at between $1.2 and $3.3 billion, placing him among the richest 0.1 percent of Kenyans—an oligarchic layer of roughly 8,300 individuals who, according to Oxfam, own more wealth than the bottom 99.9 percent combined. This obscene inequality epitomises the class gulf between Odinga and the millions he claimed to represent.

Odinga under Moi and Kibaki

Odinga’s political career began in the 1980s after his arrest following the failed 1982 coup attempt against Moi’s regime. He spent nearly eight years in detention, during which he was beaten, denied medical care, and subjected to psychological torture that left him with lasting speech difficulties. Upon his release, he re-emerged in the 1990s as a leading figure in the bourgeois opposition to Moi’s dictatorship, the “Second Liberation” movement. Alongside Kenneth Matiba and Charles Rubia, Odinga campaigned for the restoration of multi-party democracy, channelling growing popular anger against the regime into a struggle for limited constitutional reforms within the framework of capitalism.

Odinga’s role as leader of the opposition was boosted by what passed as the leading underground left-wing opposition to the regime, the Maoist Mwakenya. With its two-stage theory of first reinstalling capitalist democracy, postponing indefinitely the struggle for socialism, it helped funnel opposition into Odinga’s camp. It called for “all progressive democratic and patriotic political organisations, workers trade unions, peasant cooperatives, professional bodies, religious organizations, student societies, the business community, welfare and other nongovernmental interest groups to unite in a single force of action to pressure Moi to resign.” Many of its members, including future Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, became key Odinga allies.

Facing mounting unrest and pressure from Washington, long his backer but now fearful of a genuine popular uprising, Moi was forced to repeal the constitutional ban on opposition parties, paving the way for Kenya’s first multi-party elections in 1992.

By the late 1990s, Odinga had reconciled with the regime and merged his National Development Party (NDP) with Moi’s deeply unpopular KANU after contesting the 1997 elections. He went on to serve as Moi’s Minister of Energy, marking his entry into the state apparatus. 

In 2002, as social opposition to Moi intensified, Odinga left Moi’s government and joined a coalition of anti-Moi bourgeois parties led by Mwai Kibaki, Moi’s former minister of finance. With Kibaki ill during the campaign, Odinga effectively led the election effort that ended Moi’s 24-year rule. However, after the victory, Kibaki sidelined him, denying Odinga and his allies the senior positions they had been promised. Given the post of Minister for Roads, Odinga soon fell out with Kibaki, whose government, like Moi’s before it, unleashed brutal police violence—including the extrajudicial killing of an estimated 8,000 mostly young men. 

Out of power, Odinga continued as the main opposition figurehead, while making it clear he was virulently opposed to socialism. In his autobiography, The Flame of Freedom (2013), he recounted how, ahead of the 2007 elections:

Because of my father’s and my longstanding support for equitable distribution of national resources, I had often been accused of being left-wing anti-capitalist (the latter a strange misconception about a man who, like his father before him, had long been involved in private enterprise). It was said that, as president, I would reverse some privatisations and make radical changes to the Kenyan stock market. The latter probably also had a connection with the charge I had made that the extensive profits from illegal drug-dealing had been ploughed into the national bourse [stock market]. In mid-October, I visited the Nairobi Stock Exchange to offer assurances of my support for its continued activities.

The “Grand Coalition” with Kibaki and alliance with Kenyatta

The 2007 elections marked the peak of Odinga’s political influence and the most violent crisis of Kenya’s post-independence history. Running as the main opposition candidate against incumbent Kibaki, Odinga appeared poised for victory until widespread electoral fraud secured Kibaki a self-declared win. Odinga called for mass demonstrations, and his supporters, largely drawn from Kenya’s working-class and impoverished layers in the slums and rural areas, poured into the streets. 

The regime responded with brutal repression. Ethnic violence, stoked by both ruling factions, engulfed the country, leaving more than 1,300 people dead and over 650,000 displaced. William Ruto, now Kenya’s president but then an ally of Odinga, played a criminal role in fomenting ethnic clashes for which he was later indicted by the International Criminal Court.

Odinga, fearing that the mass opposition might break out of his control and advised by Washington, entered into a US-brokered power-sharing agreement with Kibaki in 2008, becoming prime minister in a “Grand Coalition” government. The imperialist powers hailed the deal as a model of “stability.” It was designed to preserve Kenya’s role as a key regional base for Western military and financial interests.

During his five years as prime minister (2008–2013), Odinga demonstrated his loyalty to imperialism. His government backed US-led military interventions in Somalia under the banner of the “war on terror,” and supported France’s 2011 invasion of Ivory Coast. Domestically, his administration helped push through the 2010 Constitution, drafted under US and British guidance, as a mechanism to contain mass anger and restore confidence in the capitalist order after the post-election bloodshed of 2007.

In 2013, Odinga lost to Uhuru Kenyatta, son of the country’s first president. As disillusionment with the political establishment deepened, Odinga’s role as a “progressive” alternative was shown to be a fraud. When the 2017 elections were again marred by corruption and saw the killing of over 100 protesters, he briefly postured as leading a “people’s resistance movement.” But in early 2018, he abruptly reconciled with Kenyatta in the so-called “Handshake,” presenting the pact as a step toward “national unity.”

By the time of the 2022 election, Odinga had openly transformed into capitalist political fixer par excellence. Backed by Kenyatta, Kenya’s richest man whose family owns a multi-billion-dollar business empire, he faced Ruto, a former ally who exploited popular anger with a populist “bottom-up” campaign and by presenting himself as an outsider—despite being the sitting deputy president. Ruto’s slim victory reflected widespread hostility to Kenya’s political dynasties, including Odinga. 

Once elected, Ruto violently turned against the working class, as the economic crisis facing the country deepened, particularly soaring costs of living intensified by the NATO-Russia war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2023, Ruto imposed the first round of an IMF austerity programme, sparking mass protests. Odinga once again sought to channel mass discontent. He called intermittent protests against the austerity-driven Finance Bill 2023, only to suspend them when they began to merge with broader strikes by teachers, doctors, and civil servants. Dozens of his supporters were gunned down.

Odinga and Ruto versus the Kenyan working class and youth

Just when Odinga believed he had successfully contained social unrest, the Gen-Z uprising of mid-2024 erupted against the entire Kenyan political establishment. What began as protests against President Ruto’s IMF-dictated Finance Bill 2024—imposing sweeping taxes on fuel, bread, cooking oil, and digital services—quickly developed into a nationwide rebellion against the whole post-independence capitalist order. Unlike previous mobilisations, this movement arose entirely outside Odinga’s control. On June 25, protesters stormed parliament, and in the brutal crackdown that followed more than 60 people were killed, thousands arrested, and dozens abducted.

While he publicly voiced sympathy for the protests, Odinga was privately negotiating with Ruto on how to defuse them. Soon after, he integrated his Orange Democratic Movement into Ruto’s administration to form the current “broad-based” government, providing a political cover for the regime to push ahead with its IMF austerity agenda and consolidate a police-state dictatorship. Odinga then moved to co-opt self-styled Gen Z “leaders” into the regime’s orbit. 

The result was a de facto parliamentary dictatorship, lacking even a nominal opposition. It soon escalated bloody repression. Last July, as hundreds of thousands took to the streets, security forces killed 57 demonstrators and injured more than 600 in one of the worst massacres perpetrated by the Kenyan ruling class in decades.

Nothing could better expose the rottenness of Odinga than his death being used by the current Ruto regime to impose austerity and police-state measures. Barely had the ink dried on Odinga’s death certificate, with the media providing wall-to-wall obituaries hailing his democratic credentials, than Ruto decided to sign into law eight deeply authoritarian and anti-working-class bills.

These include the Privatisation Bill 2025, which allows the government to sell off state-owned enterprises without parliamentary approval; the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Bill 2024, granting sweeping powers to police and intelligence agencies to monitor, censor, and shut down online platforms; and the National Police Service Commission (Amendment) Bill 2024, further expanding executive control over the security apparatus.

Other laws include the National Land Commission (Amendment) and Land (Amendment) Bills, centralizing decision-making authority in Nairobi, weakening local land protections to allow more land looting by Ruto’s entourage, while the Air Passenger Service Charge (Amendment) and Virtual Asset Service Providers Bill impose new levies.

In one of his final interviews with the Sunday Nation, Odinga drew a parallel between Kenya’s youth revolt and the Egyptian Revolution of 2011, which toppled Hosni Mubarak. He recalled being “the last international leader hosted by Mubarak” before the dictator’s fall, remarking that even regimes that seem strong can collapse within weeks. Odinga’s message was a warning to the ruling elite that uncontained popular uprisings threaten the entire capitalist order.

The real lesson of Egypt, and of Kenya today, is that bourgeois “opposition” figures like Odinga, posing as champions of democracy, play the decisive role in strangling revolutionary movements and paving the way for renewed repression, austerity, and military rule. Odinga died at 80 in a private hospital for the wealthy in Koothattukulam, India, where he had been flown for specialist treatment. Like the rest of Kenya’s ruling elite, he sought medical care abroad while the country’s public health system, ravaged by decades of corruption, privatisation, and IMF-imposed austerity, lies in ruins.

Odinga’s death comes amid a new wave of social upheaval across the world, from PeruNepal, and Bangladesh to Madagascar, MoroccoMozambique, and Angola, driven by soaring prices, mass unemployment, IMF austerity and opposition to war and genocide. These movements express the mounting anger of workers and youth against unbearable social inequality and imperialist oppression.

Victory depends on rejecting the various representatives of a pro-capitalist opposition, which, like Odinga, fear the independent movement of the masses far more than dictatorship. The defence of democratic and social rights poses before Kenyan workers and youth the task of building a revolutionary Marxist party, a section of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI), dedicated to the perspective of Permanent Revolution—the unification of the struggles of workers and the oppressed across Africa and the world for the establishment of a United Socialist States of Africa.

Former Kenyan prime minister Raila Odinga dies aged 80 Read More »

Gaza

“සටන් විරාම” ගිවිසුමට ගාසා තීරයේ ස්ථිර ඊශ්‍රායල වාඩිලා ගැනීම ඇතුළත් වේ

ආන්ඩ්‍රේ ඩේමන්  විසිනි.

මෙහි පලවන්නේ ලෝක සමාජවාදී වෙබ් අඩවියේ (ලෝසවෙඅ) 2025 ඔක්තෝම්බර් 10 දින ‘Ceasefire” deal includes permanent Israeli occupation of Gaza’ යන හිසින් පලවූ ඇන්ඩ්‍රේ ඩේමන් විසින් ලියන ලද ලිපියේ සිංහල පරිවර්තනය යි.

Gaza
2025 ඔක්තෝබර් 9 වන බ්‍රහස්පතින්දා, මධ්‍යම ගාසා තීරයේ වාඩි ගාසා අසල අවතැන් වූ පලස්තීනුවන් එක්රැස් වන විට, ගාසා නගරයට යන වෙරළබඩ මාර්ගයේ ඊශ්‍රායල ටැංකි ස්ථානගත කර ඇත. [AP ඡායාරූපය/අබ්දෙල් කරීම් හනා)]

ඊශ්‍රායලය සහ හමාස් බ්‍රහස්පතින්දා නිවේදනය කළේ හමාස් විසින් රඳවාගෙන සිටින සියලුම ප්‍රාණ ඇපකරුවන් නිදහස් කිරීම සහ ගාසා තීරය ස්ථිර ඊශ්‍රායල ආක්‍රමණය කිරීම ඇතුළත් “සටන් විරාම” ගිවිසුමක් විධිමත් ලෙස සම්මත කර ගැනීමයි.

හමාස් දේශපාලන ප්‍රධානී කලීල් අල්-හයියා නිවේදනය කළේ, “අපගේ ජනතාවට එරෙහි යුද්ධය සහ ආක්‍රමණය අවසන් කිරීම සඳහා ගිවිසුමකට එළඹ තිබේ” යනුවෙනි.

යථාර්ථයේ දී, මෙම ගිවිසුම ගාසා තීරයේ ආධිපත්‍යය දැරීමේ සහ පලස්තීන ජනතාවගේ ජාතික අයිතිවාසිකම් මර්දනය කිරීමේ ඊශ්‍රායල-අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී සැලැස්මේ තවත් පියවරකි. එය ගාසා තීරය යටත් විජිත ආරක්ෂිත ප්‍රදේශයක් බවට පත් කෙරේ. ඇමරිකානු ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ නායකත්වයෙන් යුත් මණ්ඩලයක් විසින් එය අධීක්ෂණය කරනු ලබන අතර ගාසා තීරයේ විශාල කොටසක් ස්ථිර ඊශ්‍රායල අත්පත් කර ගැනීමට ඇතුළත් වේ.

අල්-හයියා ප්‍රකාශ කළේ, “මැදිහත්කරුවන්ගෙන් සහ එක්සත් ජනපද පරිපාලනයෙන් අපට සහතික ලැබුණු අතර, යුද්ධය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම අවසන් වී ඇති බව සියලු දෙනා තහවුරු කළහ” යනුවෙනි. කෙසේ වෙතත්, මෙම “සහතික” ලබා දුන් පුද්ගලයින්ම, පසුගිය මාසයේ කටාර් වෙත ඊශ්‍රායල බෝම්බ හෙලීමට පහසුකම් සැලසූ අතර එම ප්‍රහාරය අල්-හයියා මරා දැමීමට උත්සාහ කෙරුණකි.

සෞදි අරාබි රජය ගිවිසුමට ප්‍රශංසා කරමින්, “මෙම වැදගත් පියවර මානුෂීය දුක් වේදනා සමනය කිරීම සඳහා කඩිනම් ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයකට තුඩු දෙනු ඇත … සම්පූර්ණ ඊශ්‍රායල ඉවත්වීමක් ලබා ගැනීම, ආරක්ෂාව සහ ස්ථාවරත්වය යථා තත්ත්වයට පත් කිරීම සහ ද්වි-රාජ්‍ය විසඳුම මත පදනම් වූ සාධාරණ හා පුළුල් සාමයක් ලබා ගැනීම සඳහා ප්‍රායෝගික පියවර ආරම්භ කරනු ඇත”, යනුවෙන් ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

එය එවැනි දෙයක් නොකරනු ඇත. එය පලස්තීනයේ නීති විරෝධී ඊශ්‍රායල වාඩිලෑම තහවුරු කරනු ඇති අතර ගාසා තීරය වාර්ගිකව සුද්ධ කිරීමේ සැලැස්මට පහසුකම් සැලසීම සහ ඉදිරියට ගෙන යාම සඳහා ගාසා තීරයේ ආහාර සැපයුමේ ගෙල සිර කිරීමට ඊශ්‍රායලය ස්ථිරවම ස්ථානගත කරනු ඇත.

ගිවිසුම අනුමත කර එය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට එකඟ වූ මැද පෙරදිග සහ පුළුල් කලාපයේ  ඊජිප්තුව, ජෝර්දානය, කටාර්, සෞදි අරාබිය, තුර්කිය සහ එක්සත් අරාබි එමීර් රාජ්‍යය ඇතුළු ධනේශ්වර ජාතිකවාදී ආණ්ඩු විසින් විශේෂයෙන් අශෝභන කාර්යභාරයක් ඉටු කර ඇත.

ගිවිසුමේ කොටසක් ලෙස, ඊශ්‍රායල හමුදා ගාසා තීරයෙන් සියයට 58 ක් වන ඊනියා “කහ රේඛාවකට” පසුබසිනු ඇත. ගිවිසුමේ අවසාන අදියරේදී, ඊශ්‍රායල හමුදා ගාසා තීරයට යන සියලුම ගොඩබිම් හරස් මාර්ග පාලනය කරන ස්වාරක්ෂක කලාපයකට පසුබසිනු ඇති අතර, එය ජනගහනය තවදුරටත් හිතාමතා සාගින්නෙන් පෙළන තර්ජනයට හෙලනු ඇත. 

මෙම ගනුදෙනුව 19 වන සියවසේ පැවති මැද පෙරදිග විවෘත යටත් විජිත ආධිපත්‍යයට නැවත පැමිණීමක් සනිටුහන් කරයි. යෝජනාව යටතේ, ගාසා තීරය පාලනය කරනු ලබන්නේ “ජනාධිපති ඩොනල්ඩ් ජේ. ට්‍රම්ප් විසින් ප්‍රධානත්වය දරනු ලබන සහ සභාපතිත්වය දරන” සහ “හිටපු [එක්සත් රාජධානියේ] අගමැති ටෝනි බ්ලෙයාර්” ඇතුළත් වන “සාම මණ්ඩලයක්” විසිනි.

වොෂින්ටන් පෝස්ට් පුවත්පත මෙම ගිවිසුම “හමාස් යටත් වීමක් සහ ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ ජයග්‍රහණයක්” බව ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. එය, “මෙම ගනුදෙනුව කුමක් දැයි හඳුන්වන්න: සම්පූර්ණ හමාස් යටත් වීමක්” එය “සැමරීමට වටිනවා”, යනුවෙන් පුරසාරම් දොඩා ඇත. 

වෝල් ස්ට්‍රීට් ජර්නලය ද ප්‍රීති ඝෝෂාවට එක්වෙමින්, “හමාස් එහි හොඳම ලීවරය අත්හරිමින් සිටින නමුත් ඊශ්‍රායලය එසේ නොවේ. ප්‍රාණ ඇපකරුවන් මුදවා ගැනීමෙන් පසුව පවා, ඊශ්‍රායල් සොල්දාදුවන් ඊජිප්තු දේශසීමාව ඇතුළුව ගාසා තීරයෙන් අඩකට වඩා රැඳී සිටිනු ඇත” යනුවෙන් ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. එය නිගමනය කළේ, “මෙම කොන්දේසි පිළිගැනීමේදී, හමාස් ඵලදායී ලෙස එහි පරාජය පිළිගනී.”

 වෝල් ස්ට්‍රීට් ජර්නලය පැහැදිලි කළ පරිදි, සටන් විරාමය ඊළඟ ප්‍රහාරය සඳහා කොන්දේසි නිර්මානය කරනු ඇත. “ගාසා තීරයේ යොදවා ඇති නව ගල්ෆ් අරාබි නායකත්වයෙන් යුත් ස්ථායීකරණ බලකාය හමාස් නිරායුධ කිරීමට සහ තීරුව මිලිටරිහරණය කිරීමට අපොහොසත් වුවහොත්, එය කිරීමට ට්‍රම්ප් ‘පූර්ණ සහාය’ ලෙස හඳුන්වන සහාය සමගින් ඊශ්‍රායල හමුදාවට හැකි වනු ඇත.”

පසුගිය මාසයේ කටාර් වෙත එල්ල වූ ඊශ්‍රායල ප්‍රහාරය අරාබි රජයන් ගිවිසුම පිළිගැනීමට “බලපෑමට ලක්වීමට” උපකාරී වූ බව වෝල් ස්ට්‍රීට් ජර්නලය තවදුරටත් පැවසීය. රුසියාවට එරෙහි එක්සත් ජනපද යුද්ධය තීව්‍ර කිරීම සඳහා මැද පෙරදිග පුරා ඔහු භාවිතා කළ එම ආක්‍රමණශීලී බව පෙන්වන ලෙස ට්‍රම්ප්ට පුවත්පත උපදෙස් දුන්නේය. “ට්‍රම්ප් මහතා දැන් රුසියාව පිළිබඳ ඔහුගේ උපාය මාර්ගය ආපසු හරවන්නේ නම්, ලබන වසරේ නොබෙල් කමිටුවට පවා ඔහුට සාම ත්‍යාගය ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කිරීමට නොහැකි විය හැකිය” යනුවෙන් එය ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

“සාම” ගිවිසුම ප්‍රථම වරට ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කළ විට එය හෙළා දකිමින්, පලස්තීනුවන් සඳහා වූ ජාත්‍යන්තර යුක්තිය පිළිබඳ මධ්‍යස්ථානය (ICJP) මෙසේ ලිවීය: “සැලැස්මට ජාත්‍යන්තර ‘සාම මණ්ඩලයක්’ ඇතුළත් කිරීම … පලස්තීන අනාගතය පිළිබඳ තීරණ ගැනීමේදී පලස්තීන හඬ බැහැර කිරීම සහතික කරයි.”

ICJP හි ප්‍රකාශකයෙකු වන ඔර්ලයිත් රෝ සඳහන් කළේ, “මෙම සැලැස්ම ඊශ්‍රායලයට විරාමයක් තබා, නැවත සන්නද්ධ වී, නව දණ්ඩ විමුක්තියකින් පසුව ප්‍රචණ්ඩත්වයට නැවත පැමිණීමට තවත් අවස්ථාවක් ලබා දෙයි” යනුවෙනි. එය “යටත් විජිත වාචාලකමේ සැඟවී පවතින” බව ඔහු තවදුරටත් පැවසීය.

ගිවිසුම නිරීක්ෂණය කිරීම සහ අධීක්ෂණය කිරීම සඳහා එක්සත් ජනපදය ඊශ්‍රායලයට අමතර භටයින් 200 ක් යවන බව ඇසෝසියේටඩ් ප්‍රෙස් වාර්තා කළේය.

වසර දෙකක් පුරා පැවති ගාසා සංහාරය අවම වශයෙන් පලස්තීනුවන් 65,000 ක් මරා දැමීමට සහ එම ප්‍රදේශයේ ගොඩනැගිලිවලින් අතිමහත් බහුතරයක් විනාශ කිරීමට හේතු වී තිබේ. ගාසා තීරය දෙදරා ගොස් ඇති අතර එහි ජනගහනය කුසගින්නේ සිටී. මෙම සතියේ ද ලැන්සෙට් හි ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරන ලද අධ්‍යයනයකින් ඇස්තමේන්තු කර ඇත්තේ ගාසා තීරයේ ළමුන් 55,000 ක් උග්‍ර මන්දපෝෂණයෙන් පෙළෙන බවයි. සමීක්ෂණයට ලක් කළ ළමුන් අතර, සියයට 16 ක් ආහාර නොමැතිකම නිසා ඇතිවන නාස්තියේ සලකුණු පෙන්නුම් කළහ.

“සටන් විරාම” ගිවිසුමට ගාසා තීරයේ ස්ථිර ඊශ්‍රායල වාඩිලා ගැනීම ඇතුළත් වේ Read More »

Gaza

2 years of the Gaza genocide: A crime of Zionism and imperialism

By WSWS Editorial Board.

This Perspective was published in the World Socialist Website Site on 06 October 2025.

Today marks two years since the beginning of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, one of the greatest crimes of the modern era. Before the eyes of the entire world, the Israeli government—armed, financed and defended by every imperialist power—has carried out a campaign of mass murder, ethnic cleansing and deliberate starvation. At least 67,000 Palestinians have been killed, including 20,000 children, and the entire population has been repeatedly displaced.

Gaza
Displaced Palestinians fleeing northern Gaza carry their belongings along the coastal road toward southern Gaza, Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025, after the Israeli army issued evacuation orders from Gaza City. [AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi]

In order to launch this long planned genocide, Israel used as its pretext the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, in which a few thousand fighters with small arms, possessing no armored vehicles or aircraft, breached the Israeli border without resistance. To claim that Israel, with one of the most sophisticated intelligence networks in the world, was taken completely by surprise by a few thousand Hamas fighters is a despicable fiction.

As the events of the past two years have shown—in Israel’s assassinations of foreign leaders, military officers and scientists—Israeli intelligence has penetrated every state and movement in the region. Indeed, within months of the October 7 attacks, newspaper accounts revealed that Israel possessed the entire Hamas battle plan but orchestrated a deliberate stand-down of its troops stationed on the border.

The genocide that followed was the premeditated outcome of 75 years of brutal oppression, the implementation of the “final solution” to the Palestinian “problem.” It has exposed before the entire world the bankrupt and reactionary character of Zionism. The Israeli state has shown itself to be a murderous instrument of imperialism.

While carried out by Israel, the genocide has been a joint operation of world imperialism. Every imperialist government, from Washington to London, Paris and Berlin, together with the entire media, justified the Israeli assault on Gaza. A hideous double standard was adopted, in which any act of mass murder by Israel, which illegally occupies Gaza, was justified, while any effort at resistance by the Palestinians was demonized as “terrorism.”

Opposition to the Israeli state was slandered as “antisemitism,” in an exercise that the WSWS referred to as “semantic inversion,” in which “a word is utilized in a manner and within a context that is the exact opposite of its real and long-accepted meaning.” This became the framework for a brutal and escalating assault on democratic rights, in which opposition to genocide has been criminalized. The attempt to equate opposition to the genocide with hatred of the Jews, is, in any case, negated by the prominent role played by Jewish people around the world in mass demonstrations. 

The United States has been Israel’s key weapons supplier, funneling unlimited amounts of deadly military gear to fuel the slaughter. But Germany, France, Britain and others have all contributed their share to the bloodbath. Moreover, they have all purchased billions in Israeli government bonds to help finance the murderous military machine they also armed.

Underscoring the fact that these crimes have been facilitated by the major North American and European powers, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was allowed to defend his actions from the podium of the United Nations last month, even though an arrest warrant against him for war crimes is outstanding.

The imperialists back the genocide as a central component of their drive to secure control over the oil-rich Middle East, part of a global eruption of imperialist war targeting Russia and China. Their support for the genocide has demonstrated that they are ready to deploy any and all means to secure for themselves access to markets, raw materials, labour and geostrategic influence.

This imperialist plunder has culminated in Trump’s “peace” plan, which proposes robbing Palestinians of all their rights by creating a neo-colonial protectorate under the control of America’s would-be Führer and his bagman, the unindicted war criminal Tony Blair. If Hamas follows Trump’s demand to accept this arrangement, the Palestinians will be expelled to make way for a US-controlled trade corridor through the Middle East. If they refuse, Israel will get the green light to slaughter the remaining Palestinians en masse.

A particularly foul role in this process has been played by the bourgeois nationalist regimes of the Middle East. The entire history of the 20th century has shown the incapacity of any form of nationalism to secure the democratic and social rights of the working class. The despicable role of these governments culminated in their embrace of the “peace” plan promoted by Trump, which completely repudiates the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.

The genocide in Gaza has provoked mass revulsion and opposition throughout the world. Over the past two years, tens of millions have participated in demonstrations spanning every continent, from Europe and the Americas to the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Trump’s plan to turn the Middle East into a US fiefdom on the bones of the Palestinians, and Israel’s violent seizure of the Sumud aid flotilla, have ignited a new and broader wave of protest.

In recent days, millions have filled the streets of Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Colombia and Argentina. In Italy, action initiated by dockworkers, who refused to load weapons for Israel, triggered a one-day general strike of more than 2 million workers and a million-strong march in Rome. Though still limited by the trade union bureaucracies and appeals to the Meloni government, these actions point to the immense potential power of the international working class to halt the genocide.

One day of coordinated strike action has shaken Trump’s closest European ally. An organized, global industrial and political movement of the working class could stop the imperialist war machine in its tracks. Nothing less than a mass, international movement of workers can end the genocide and block the extension of American imperialism’s drive for domination—from Gaza to a wider war aimed at Iran, Russia and ultimately China.

The development of opposition to the genocide must be guided by an understanding of the political lessons of the past two years. The central lesson is the total bankruptcy of all appeals to governments of the imperialist powers. They are not the instruments for halting genocide but its perpetrators and enablers.

The perspective of a two-state solution has failed. Only the unification of all the peoples of the Middle East can lead to a viable future. The Israeli state has proven to be a historical monstrosity, resulting in demoralization and degradation. The Israeli working class must repudiate the poisonous ideology and politics of Zionism, reject the reactionary dystopia of the “Jewish state” and strive for the unity of Israeli and Palestinian workers in the struggle for the United Socialist Federation of the Middle East.

In a lecture delivered on October 24, 2023, three weeks after the beginning of the genocide, WSWS International Editorial Board Chairman David North explained:

In the final analysis, the liberation of the Palestinian people can be achieved only through a unified struggle of the working class, Arab and Jewish, against the Zionist regime, as well as the treacherous Arab and Iranian capitalist regimes, and their replacement with a union of socialist republics throughout the Middle East and, indeed, the entire world.

This is a gigantic task. But it is the only perspective that is based on a correct appraisal of the present stage of world history, the contradictions and crisis of world capitalism and the dynamic of the international class struggle. The wars in Gaza and Ukraine are tragic demonstrations of the catastrophic role and consequences of national programs in a historical epoch whose essential and defining characteristics are the primacy of world economy, the globally integrated character of the productive forces of capitalism, and, therefore, the necessity to base the struggle of the working class on an international strategy.

Two years later, there are growing signs of a global resurgence of working class struggle. The Trump administration’s drive to establish a presidential dictatorship is bringing it into head-on conflict with the working class in the United States, despite all efforts by the Democrats to sow complacency and passivity. President Macron in France is unable to form a stable government, amid mass opposition to his demands for austerity to pay for remilitarisation. Starmer in the UK and Merz in Germany have no popular support whatsoever.

Internationally, there has been an explosion of popular anti-government struggles, led by “Generation Z”—in Kenya, Nepal, Indonesia, the Philippines, Morocco and Madagascar.

The development of this opposition along revolutionary lines requires that workers break free from the control of the social democratic, Stalinist and trade union bureaucracies, along with their pseudo-left defenders, who work to contain and dissipate opposition. This requires building new, democratic organizations of class struggle—rank-and-file committees in every workplace and neighborhood—to coordinate and lead a unified international offensive of the working class.

Workers, students, youth and all opponents of Zionism and imperialism must fight for:

  • An immediate halt to all weapons shipments to Israel;
  • A comprehensive boycott of all trade and other economic activity with Israel;
  • The prosecution of all US, European and other corporations assisting Israel in carrying out the genocide.
  • The arrest of Israeli officials for war crimes;
  • An end to state repression of anti-genocide protesters and the repeal of all anti-demonstration laws;
  • Immediate, unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza by all available routes.

These demands must spearhead the broader movement already developing in the working class internationally. The same governments that funnel weapons of death to Israel are erecting dictatorial forms of rule at home to suppress opposition to oligarchic rule, mass impoverishment and the drive to world war.

The genocide in Gaza has laid bare the historical dead end of the capitalist system itself. The “normalization” of genocide is the product of a system that has exhausted any progressive role. It is accompanied by the normalization of fascism, the normalization of military-police dictatorship, the normalization of world war and oligarchic rule.

The perspective that must guide the working class is Trotsky’s theory of Permanent Revolution. The democratic and social aspirations of the oppressed can be achieved only through the independent political mobilization of the working class, on a world scale, for the conquest of power.

The critical task is the building of a new revolutionary leadership to guide this struggle. The International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) and its sections, the Socialist Equality Parties, fight to unite workers and youth across all borders in a single movement against capitalism, for the establishment of workers’ governments and the socialist reorganization of the world economy to meet human need, not private profit.

2 years of the Gaza genocide: A crime of Zionism and imperialism Read More »

Trump

Trump’s fascist conspiracy and how to fight it: A socialist strategy

Socialist Equality Party (US)

This statement was published originally in the World Socialist Web Site on the 19 September 2025.

In the week since the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the Trump administration has escalated its conspiracy to establish a presidential dictatorship.

The policy of the Trump regime was spelled out clearly by fascist strategist Stephen Bannon, one of Trump’s closest political allies. “If we are going to go to war,” he declared, “let’s go to war.” The Trump administration is waging a war—against the population, against democratic rights, against Constitutional government.

Trump
President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Sept. 19, 2025, in Washington. [AP Photo/Alex Brandon]

This war is being conducted within the framework of the public deification of Kirk. Over the past week, the White House has spearheaded a campaign to ban all criticism of the Trump administration. Workers, including teachers, airline staff and others, have been fired for critical social media posts about Kirk. 

On Wednesday, ABC/Disney announced that it was suspending Jimmy Kimmel Live!, after Kimmel made mild, accurate remarks on Monday about the political exploitation of Kirk’s killing. The move followed an explicit directive from the White House and its enforcers. FCC (Federal Communications Commission) Chair Brendan Carr threatened broadcasters, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” Nexstar and Disney, desperate to protect multibillion-dollar mergers and profits, rushed to comply.

In interviews Thursday, Carr declared that Kimmel’s suspension was not the “last shoe to drop,” calling for a “massive shift that’s taking place in the media ecosystem.” On the same day, Trump himself declared that regulators should revoke the licenses of broadcasters who air “negative coverage” of him.

The critical question now is: What must be done to stop this drive to dictatorship? In answering this question, it is necessary to identify the political context of Trump’s attempt to overthrow the Constitution, the class and economic interests that underlie the actions of the government, the social force that has the power to defend democratic rights, and the political strategy and program upon which the fight against Trump must be based.

First, it is necessary to put aside all self-deluding hopes that what is unfolding is anything less than a drive to establish a presidential dictatorship, based on the military, police, paramilitary forces and fascist gangs. The essential purpose of the glorification of Charlie Kirk has been to provide a martyr symbol to galvanize the most reactionary forces in the country.

As the World Socialist Web Site has warned, the Hitler admirers in Trump’s inner circle, such as Vice President JD Vance and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, are working off the playbook written by the Nazis. Kirk is the Trump regime’s “Horst Wessel” (the name of a murdered storm trooper) and the assassination is their equivalent to the infamous Reichstag Fire, the burning of the German parliament building, which was seized upon by Hitler to claim absolute power in March 1933.

The cancellation of the Jimmy Kimmel show is yet another action based on the tactics of the Nazi regime. Any form of speech, including jokes, that was deemed insulting to the honor and dignity of Hitler was treated as a criminal offense that merited drastic punishment. The “Heil Hitler” salute became an obligatory form of greeting, even between friends.

Second, Trump is not acting on his own. However grotesque his individual qualities, he represents the interests of the corporate and financial oligarchy. Here again, the parallels to Nazi Germany are chilling. It is a historical fact that Hitler’s rise to power would not have been possible without the resources provided to the Nazi movement by leading German capitalists. Once in office, Hitler’s brutal regime served the interests of German banks and corporations, and they supported his dictatorship.

If anything, the alliance of Trump and today’s financial-corporate oligarchy is even more intense than that which prevailed in Nazi Germany. It can be described, without exaggeration, as a love affair. In the midst of Trump’s assault on democratic rights, he was feted last week at a White House dinner, where a gang of mega-millionaires and billionaires sang his praises. An even more obscene spectacle was staged this week at Windsor Castle in Britain. Seated next to King Charles III, Trump was feted at a state banquet by a retinue of oligarchs, including Tim Cook of Apple, Sam Altman of OpenAI, Satya Nadella of Microsoft, Ruth Porat of Alphabet, financiers Steve Schwarzman of Blackstone, Jane Fraser of Citigroup, Larry Fink of BlackRock and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America.

Third, underlying the public reverence for Trump are cold-blooded economic and political calculations. The staggering concentration of wealth in an infinitesimal segment of the population is not compatible with democratic forms of rule. The rich are convinced that the defense of their wealth and their unrestricted exploitation of the working class is incompatible with democracy. Dictatorship is their preferred form of political rule.

However, the oligarchy’s reasons for supporting the overthrow of whatever remains of American democracy extend beyond their uncontainable lust for ever greater heaps of money and personal wealth. The American ruling class is acutely conscious of and terrified by the existential crisis of the capitalist system. It is aware that the national debt—now approaching $40 trillion—is unsustainable. 

The oligarchs are convinced that a massive assault on the living standards and even the lives of the working class is necessary. All the social reforms extending back to the Progressive era of the first two decades of the 20th century, the New Deal of the 1930s, and the Great Society of the 1960s must be ended. Critical programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are to be all but eliminated. The war on medicine—to the point of ending vaccinations against COVID, measles, mumps, polio, whooping cough, and other deadly illnesses—is aimed at substantially raising infant and child mortality and lowering life expectancy.

The wiping out of regulations that provided any sort of protection against injury and death in factories, mines, depots, shipyards, and other workplaces is a major objective. 

Yet another factor in the political calculations of the capitalist elites is the geo-political crisis confronting American imperialism. The protracted deterioration in the global economic and strategic position of the United States has reached critical dimensions. The rise of China and the development of an alliance of states challenging American hegemony cannot be stopped except through war. The militarization of the United States demands ever greater expenditures, which, in turn, intensifies the pressure to slash social expenditures and wages. Moreover, the preparation and launching of wars requires the violent suppression of domestic political opposition.

These are the objective factors that underlie the collapse of American democracy. Trump’s policies are those of the ruling class. This is not to ignore the specific pathological features of his personality and that of his MAGA cabal that impart to this regime its particularly degenerate character. But even if the workings of actuarial statistics were to suddenly remove Trump from the scene, it would not halt the drive to dictatorship. The war on democracy and the working class would continue.

This objective cause of the breakdown of democracy is verified by the fact that parallel processes are being manifested in all major capitalist countries. Throughout Europe neo-fascist parties are gaining strength. The drive toward dictatorship is a global phenomenon. 

Fourth, the correct identification of the source of Trump’s war against the working class leads to critical political conclusions. The starting point of any serious struggle against dictatorship is a break with the Democratic Party. To rely on the Democratic Party to oppose Trump is to guarantee defeat.

The Democrats are, like the Republicans, a party of Wall Street, the Pentagon, and the corporate-financial oligarchy. What they fear above all is not the rise of fascism but the eruption of a mass movement from below that threatens the foundations of capitalist rule. This accounts for the Democratic Party’s cowardly capitulation to the fascist glorification of Kirk and its feckless response to the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel and all the previous dictatorial decrees issued by Trump.

The prostration of the Democratic Party was exposed when the US Senate unanimously approved a resolution marking October 14, Kirk’s birthday, as a “National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk.” Not one Democrat, including Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, had the courage to object. It would have been sufficient, and politically correct, to oppose the assassination on principled grounds, i.e., that the killing of one or another despicable figure serves absolutely no progressive interest, that it sows confusion among workers and youth and that it plays into the hands of the reactionaries.

But to sanction the elevation of Kirk—a man whose record of racism, antisemitism, opposition to civil rights, and promotion of authoritarian violence is well documented—as a national hero is obscene. Yet Sanders and the Democrats joined in this sanctification.

The next day, 90 Democrats, including the party’s leadership, voted with Republicans in the House to pass a resolution “honoring the life and legacy of Charles Kirk,” praising the fascist provocateur as a martyr for “freedom” and “civil discourse,” and a “fierce defender” of “life, liberty, limited government, and individual responsibility.” 

Fifth, the development of the struggle to defeat Trump must be based on the mobilization of the multimillioned working class—the social force that has the power, if mobilized on the basis of a correct political strategy, to defeat Trump and drive him from office.

The key elements of this strategy are: 

1) The complete political and organizational independence of the working class from the Democratic Party and its collaborators and apologists, i.e., the DSA, Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the myriad middle class organizations and individuals who believe that shouting obscenities on various social media platforms will stop Trump. These are the methods of frustrated liberals who hope that their hysterical rhetoric will move the Democratic Party to fight Trump.

2) The building of a new form of organization that can unify the working class and mobilize its vast industrial and economic power against the Trump regime. This new form of organization proposed by the Socialist Equality Party consists of rank-and-file committees. They must be established in every factory, workplace, school and neighborhood to organize resistance to Trump’s dictatorship. These committees must become centers of resistance, uniting all sections of the working class (in industry, logistics, transport, restaurants and fast food, social services, legal defense, education, arts and culture, entertainment, medicine, health care, sciences, computer technology, programming and other highly specialized professions) and student youth against Trump’s fascist government, the complicity of the Democrats, and the broader assault on democratic rights and living standards. 

The building of rank-and-file committees is essential to break the stranglehold of the trade union bureaucracies, which function as industrial police for the corporations and utilize their power to block every form of resistance by the working class. Power must be transferred from the offices of the bureaucratic parasites to the workers on the shop floor and job sites, where decisions on all matters of strategy, policy and action can be made democratically by the working class.

These rank-and-file committees, spreading across all workplaces, will create new centers of coordinated social power upon which the defense of democracy throughout the country can be based. The mobilized working class will be able to inspire with confidence and unify all the now disparate elements of protest in a massive social movement against the hated government led and controlled by capitalist oligarchy.

3) This movement, led by the working class, requires a program that accurately reflects socio-economic realities and corresponds to the interests of the overwhelming majority of the population. The capitalist oligarchy has declared war on the working class. The necessary response is the declaration of war by the working class on capitalism, which must result in the socialist reorganization of society. This entails the establishment of public ownership and democratic control by the working class of major industries, banks, utilities and natural resources. Moreover, the obscene levels of wealth concentrated in the approximately 900 billionaires must be expropriated. The 400 richest Americans alone hold a combined wealth of $6.6 trillion, which represents a growth by more than $1 trillion over the previous year. The concentration of so much money and power is a social malignancy that kills democracy.

4) The most important element of this strategy—upon which the implementation and realization of all previous elements depends—is internationalism. No effective struggle can be waged by workers in the United States unless their actions are coordinated and aligned with the struggles of the global working class. The threat of fascism is an international phenomenon. The capitalist ruling class of every country has its own version of Trump and even Hitler. American workers must repudiate the reactionary, outdated and self-defeating ideology of nationalism, which is the primal evil that instigates the racism and ethnic hatreds utilized by fascism. It is not an accidental coincidence that Trump launched his drive for dictatorship by unleashing a savage assault on immigrants. The deprivation of their democratic rights was only the first stage in the overthrow of the Constitution. The masked ICE agents who prowl through cities are the vanguard of the fascist paramilitary that Trump is planning to unleash against all sections of the working class.

An inseparable corollary of the fight for the international unity of American workers with their class brothers and sisters beyond the borders of the United States is irreconcilable opposition to US imperialism, militarism and war. The Gaza genocide carried out by the Zionist regime, which has to a great extent been carried out with weapons provided by the United States, reveals the barbarism of which capitalism is capable. The mass murder of Palestinians sanctioned by all the imperialist powers is an anticipation of what the capitalist oligarchs are prepared to inflict against the workers in their “own” countries.

It flows from this internationalist strategy that the rights of immigrants must be defended against the criminal and inhumane policy of deportation. The principle of birthright citizenship, inscribed in the Constitution, must be defended without compromise. Further, the class-conscious worker rejects the insidious and cruel distinction between the “native” and “foreign born.” Moreover, sanctions and tariffs imposed by the Trump administration must be opposed. The working class cannot defend its jobs and interests by supporting economic nationalism, which is entirely reactionary in an era of the global integration of production. The working class can advance its interests only by demanding the tearing down of national boundaries, which not only strangle the development of the productive forces but also lead mankind down the terrible path to nuclear world war.

Even before Trump began his second term and launched his drive for dictatorship, the Socialist Equality Party issued a call for the formation of the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC). This initiative has not only been vindicated. Its development has acquired burning urgency.

5) The strategy, organization and action that are necessary to defeat Trump, defend democratic rights, and prevent fascism and war will not emerge spontaneously. This program must be fought for. But the determination that is required to take up and wage this fight is incompatible with pessimism and demoralization. These moods lead to paralysis. Moreover, pessimism is invariably connected to a superficial and false appraisal of reality. The Democrats, the unions and the media cultivate the myth of an all-powerful government while insisting that nothing can be done. This is a lie. What is lacking is not mass opposition but, rather, a political strategy to guide and organize the struggle against Trump’s assault on democratic rights.

The Socialist Equality Party advances this program as the basis for the struggle against Trump and the degenerate oligarchy which he represents. Our program is not for the pessimists, the skeptics and the demoralized, but for the fighters among workers, students, youth, professionals, artists and intellectuals. There is no time to lose.

We call on all workers and young people who agree with this perspective to join the Socialist Equality Party, mobilize the power of the working class, defeat the conspiracy of the oligarchs and fight for a socialist future without fascism, genocide and war

Trump’s fascist conspiracy and how to fight it: A socialist strategy Read More »

T

The Socialist Equality Party is established in Turkey as a section of the International Committee of the Fourth International

Statement of the International Committee of the Fourth International

Reposted below is the ICFI Statement published in the World Socialist Web Site on 13 August 2025.

The International Committee of the Fourth International welcomes with pride and enthusiasm the establishment of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International) as the Turkish section of the World Party of Socialist Revolution.

The formation of the section of the ICFI in Turkey is an event of immense historical significance. Although it was on the island of Büyükada (Prinkipo) in 1933 that the call for the building of the Fourth International was issued, the establishment of the SEP marks the first time that a party has been formed in Turkey based on the internationalist program and principles of Trotskyism.

The establishment of the Turkish section is the outcome of an intense and systematic process of theoretical, historical and political clarification. The foundations for the formation of a Trotskyist party in Turkey were laid by the late comrade Halil Celik, who initiated political discussions with the International Committee. Halil’s contact with the ICFI and his commitment to building its Turkish section resulted from his conclusion, drawn from years of painful experience with various forms of Pabloite opportunism, that relentless political struggle against these tendencies was necessary.

In 2014 the ICFI formally endorsed the efforts of comrade Halil, who had begun the education of a group of young socialists in the history of the Fourth International, to establish a section in Turkey. In 2018 the Sosyalist Eşitlik Grubu (Socialist Equality Group) was formed. 

Celia
Halil Celik (1961-2018)

Halil undertook the translation of major publications of the International Committee into Turkish. He wrote: 

In a country where the working class and socialist movement in general have been dominated by Stalinism, Maoism and petty-bourgeois nationalist tendencies for decades, these books are of prime importance in developing socialist consciousness among workers and youth. Publications of the contemporary Marxist literature produced by the world Trotskyist movement in Turkish, we believe, will contribute to laying the theoretical and political foundation for the building of the Turkish section of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI).

Despite his untimely death on December 31, 2018, Halil had by then recruited and educated a cadre of Sosyalist Eşitlik Grubu that was determined to carry forward the fight for Trotskyism. 

In June 2022 the SEG submitted its application to join the ICFI. The resolution motivating the application stated: 

The building of a revolutionary party in any country is possible only on the basis of an international perspective, program and party. The only solution to the major problems in Turkey, which is in a critical position in terms of global geopolitics and class struggle, is the international socialist revolution. The founding of the SEP (Turkey) will be an expression of the global expansion of the ICFI, the only political tendency that assumes the task of solving the great historical problems.

The International Committee accepted the application of the SEG. This posed before the Turkish comrades the challenge of elaborating the historical foundations and principles of the new section. As there had never been a Trotskyist party in Turkey, this required the most exacting political work. It demanded not only a thorough assimilation of the history of the Fourth International, but also an analysis and explanation of the complex political and strategic issues that confront the Trotskyist movement in Turkey. 

While pursuing this theoretical work, contributing significantly to the editorial work of the World Socialist Web Site, and continuing their ambitious program of publishing critical works of the International Committee, the SEG undertook important political initiatives to expand the political presence of the ICFI. Of particular importance was the SEG’s organization, beginning in 2023, of annual meetings on the island of Büyükada to commemorate the life and work of Leon Trotsky.

In April 2025 the International Committee voted to approve the transformation of the SEG into the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi and its recognition as a section of the World Party of Socialist Revolution. This vote was taken following a careful review of the organization’s document, The Historical and International Foundations of the Socialist Equality Party (Turkey). 

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal held its founding congress in Istanbul on June 13-15, 2025. In addition to the historical document, the SEP also adopted a Statement of Principles and a constitution. In accordance with Turkish law, the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal was obligated to apply in Ankara for formal recognition as a party by the state. The official certification was received in August. 

In a video statement announcing the formation of the SEP, posted on the World Socialist Web Site, its national chairman Ulaş Sevinç states:

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi is unlike other political parties. We are part of the World Party of Socialist Revolution. We reject all forms of nationalism and fight for the international unity of workers, who have common interests and enemies worldwide. We reject petty-bourgeois identity politics, recognizing that the fundamental division in society is class-based.

All fundamental problems facing humanity are global problems stemming from the capitalist system. Since one cause of these problems is private ownership of the means of production and another is the division of the world into economically obsolete nation states, the solutions must also be international. The working class, as an international class, is the only social force capable of implementing these solutions. Rather than pursuing a “multipolar” capitalist world, the alternative to the nation-state system that leads to imperialist war and genocide is a federation of world workers’ states that will eliminate borders.

The ongoing genocide in Gaza is the most striking manifestation of the barbarism of the capitalist system and the decay of all parties defending it. As with other critical issues, it has become clear that the Palestinian question cannot be solved within the existing capitalist nation-state system. The same applies to the Kurdish question, which is an international issue. The only valid, progressive solution to these questions is a Socialist Federation of the Middle East, which will be established through the revolutionary mobilization of workers of all nationalities.

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi unequivocally rejects the “lesser evil” policy and fights for the political independence of the working class. This means rejecting class-collaborationist “popular front” politics, which subordinate the working class to bourgeois parties and interests.

Regardless of their differences, all capitalist parties are in complete agreement on two fundamental issues: allegiance to imperialism and hostility toward the interests of the working class. For this reason, by their very nature, they cannot resolve any fundamental political issues, including the Kurdish question. They cannot establish a democratic regime, ensure social equality, or pursue an anti-imperialist foreign policy. As Leon Trotsky explained in his theory of permanent revolution, these tasks fall to the working class in the struggle for socialism. That is, the struggle for democracy is inextricably linked to the struggle for socialism.

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi rejects the capitalist establishment parties and the pseudo-left parties that claim there is no alternative to collaborating with them. We call on workers and youth to build the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi as their own revolutionary party.

The Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi is a “party of history.” Our party stands in the tradition of classical Marxism of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Trotsky, as well as the tradition of the October Revolution of 1917. Since its founding in 1923, the Trotskyist movement has defended and developed this tradition against Stalinism, whose “national socialism” betrayed the revolution in the interests of the Kremlin bureaucracy’s “peaceful coexistence” with imperialism that led to the collapse of the USSR; against Social Democracy, whose reactionary program of reforming capitalism has failed; and against petty-bourgeois nationalism, which results inevitably in capitulation to imperialism and defeat.

The aim of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi and the International Committee of the Fourth International, with which it is in political solidarity, is summed up in the following statement of Trotsky, founder of the Fourth International: “… the full material and spiritual liberation of the toilers and exploited through the socialist revolution.”

Join us in this struggle that determines the fate of all humanity. Visit sosyalistesitlikpartisi.org, review our documents, and join the party!

The foundation of the Socialist Equality Party in Turkey extends the work of the Trotskyist movement into a country that stands at a key strategic juncture of not only global geopolitics but also of the international class struggle. The massively powerful multi-national proletariat of Turkey is destined to play a gigantic role in the global struggle against capitalism and imperialism. 

Moreover, the raising of the banner of Permanent Revolution by our comrades in Turkey will inspire a new generation of workers and the most principled elements among the youth and intellectuals in the “emerging” countries of the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. The political bankruptcy of the national bourgeoisie—i.e., its subservience to imperialism and inability to satisfy either the democratic aspirations or social interests of the masses—is vindicating every day the insistence of the Fourth International that the future of humanity depends upon the socialist revolution and the transfer of power to the working class.

Long Live the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi!

Long Live the International Committee of the Fourth International!

Forward to the World Socialist Revolution!

Read Statement of Principles of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International)

Read: The Historical and International Foundations of the Sosyalist Eşitlik Partisi – Dördüncü Enternasyonal (Socialist Equality Party – Fourth International)

The Socialist Equality Party is established in Turkey as a section of the International Committee of the Fourth International Read More »

Commemoration

Katuwana Massacre: Relatives commemorate victims after 36 years of intimidation and continuing impunity

Our Correspondent.

Commemoration
Katuwana Massacre Victims – From right: Sisiliyana, Edwin, Nilmini, Mathangalatha, Sujithaseeli, Chandraleka and Niranjala. Chulananda, first from the Left, was assassinated in 1990.

On August 27, at Katuwana, in Hambantota District, the relatives of the seven family members, who were massacred by Sri Lanka Army in August 1989, held an event of commemoration of their loved-ones, at the same location where they were bombed. This was the first time a commemoration event was held in remembrance of these victims of state terror after 36 years of impunity and oppression. theSocialist.lk reporters were present at the occasion.

On that fateful night, three and half a decade plus one year ago, Sri Lanka army of the Singha Regiment – 6th Battalion invaded the house of the family, where the only male who was at home at the time was the 63 year old father, J.H.A. Edwin, a Sinhalaese traditional medical physician. The others were the 53-year-old mother, H.A. Sisiliyana; the three young daughters, namely J.H.A. Nilmini Asoka (25), J.H.A. Mathangalatha (20), J.H.A. Sujithaseeli (15); a niece, W.A. Chandraleka (24), and the 6 year old granddaughter, N.A. Niranjala Wilson. All were ethnic Sinhalese. The army killed them all on the spot or, according to some witnesses—who were also killed later—the four young girls were carried to the army camp, raped for three days and killed. The house was bombed and the family was burnt with the house. 

The relatives displayed the pictures of their loved ones and lit candles. Two surviving daughters, their husbands, grandchildren and their families and friends observed minutes of silence. Even decades later, their tears have not dried. Vimukthi, a grandson of Edwin addressed the gathering. He stated as follows: 

This is the first time in 36 years that we have been able to gather here publicly to speak their names…They were silenced by guns and disappeared into the shadows of mass graves and tire pyres.

For 36 long years, we could not hold this historic event in commemoration of their memory. We could not come here, speak their names, and mourn openly. The state of terror, the climate of repression, and the continued threat against those who sought truth and justice kept families like ours silent. But silence is not forgetfulness. These years have only deepened our grief and strengthened our determination.

Today we break that silence… Those who carried them out—from the military, death squads and the police to those who directed them—must be held accountable before history, if not yet before law.

Our relatives’ blood cries out not for revenge, but for truth and justice. It cries out for recognition that these lives mattered, that the poor, the villagers, the youth killed in those years were not expendable.

We carry your names and the memories of cruelties inflicted on you forward as a profound mark of protest, so that such crimes must never be repeated.

May your memory give courage to all who fight for truth, justice and dignity and against State repression.”

He also read out the name of J.H.A. Chulananda (22), the only son of Edwin and Sisiliyana, whom he stated was “a young man who aspired to justice and social equality but was misled by the reactionary political forces of the era”, and who was killed by Beliatta Police in October 1990.  He was said to be a member of fascist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) during the 1988-1990 insurgency. When the Army failed to capture or kill him, evidently, the massacre of his entire family was orchestrated as an act of reprisal and terrorization. 

Katuwana massacre commemoration
Family members of the Katuwana Massacre victims commemorate their loved ones, marking 36 years of impunity.

Testimonials 

We talked to the victims’ relatives. Edwin’s eldest surviving daughter Chandani (63) related to us her harrowing story of years of pain, endurance and struggle:

“People called my father Weda Mahattaya. He was very much loved by people. He was a very  innocent, kind and honest man. He walked slowly, smiled pleasantly, spoke gently, and wore a sarong and the national dress. Formerly, as a monk, he had published a number of Ayurvedic books. Many people who received medicinal treatment from him have met me and told me about the compassionate, and often free, treatment they received from my father and mother. 

Our family is a large one of six daughters, and my brother, Chulananda, was the only son. Our family’s economy was founded on meager but stable earnings from my father’s Ayurvedic practice. We had paddy land and acres of coconut, cinnamon and citronella land, which my father cultivated and managed. Due to litigations on land disputes, which my father all won, he lost financially, and his businesses collapsed.  We all lived in a thatched house, made of wattle and mud. However, my father could still afford to feed all of us well, educate us, and also help the needy. 

By 1971, my father was a strong supporter of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and Sirimavo Bandaranaike. However, by 1977, he was fed-up with and dissatisfied with the United Front government and voted for the United National Party, whose leader J.R.Jayawardene promised a “Dharmista Samajaya” [A society led by noble principles].  

We all went to Katuwana Maha Vidyalaya (school). My brother did not continue his education after grade seven. He was very kind-hearted, sociable, and very helpful to the villagers. He cared for his friends and neighbors more than his own family. He often stayed away from home longer than he stayed at home. He was outstanding, intelligent, fair-looking and, naturally, the youth considered him as their leader.  He wanted to do a job, but also never wanted to leave the village. I think he had made connections with the JVP since late 1987. 

My brother had earned the wrath of village thugs and  father’s former opponents. Once they even attempted to take his life by stabbing him. He narrowly escaped with his life, but his friend succumbed to the injuries. 

In 1979, I married a teacher and lived separately. One of my older sisters married a police officer and went to live in Welimada in early 1989. All other sisters were with my parents at home, Loku (Sujithaseeli), the next to youngest preparing for her Ordinary Level Examinations. Hichchi (Mathangalatha) was studying for the Advanced Level (A/L) examination. Neela (Nilmini) was attending vocational training courses after A/L in expectation of a job.

During the school vacation in August 1989, my two elder sisters [Nilmini and Mathangalatha] came to visit us at our residence at Walasmulla [17 km from Katuwana] by bus. Our parental home was just about half a kilometer away from the Army camp located in the Katuwana Govi Jana Seva [Aggrarian Services Center] premises. While my sisters were passing the army camp, some soldiers had shouted and remarked, “well, go, have a round and come”. That was on 26th August, a Saturday. 

My sisters had lunch with us. That was our last meal together. All my three children were much fond of staying with their grandparents and aunts. So, all three were crying and pleading to go with their aunts.  Finally,  my daughter, Niranjala went with them. 

On the morning of August 29th, my husband went to Katuwana with a friend to bring our daughter back home, as school vacation was ending. My husband saw the bombed house; he saw burning human flesh and a skull. Nobody was alive, including my child.  

After the incident, I went to lodge a complaint at Walsamulla Police, as there was no police station in Katuwana at the time. The police refused to record my complaint. The Officer in Charge (OIC), K.M. Premathilake put his pistol to my mouth and shouted, ‘You woman, keep your mouth shut. Those who take arms will perish by arms.’

Exactly on my 28th birthday, on October 22, 1990, my husband received information from one Silva that my brother had been killed by Beliatta Police. Dasanayake, OIC of the Beliatta Police, who had shot my brother, had quickly informed K. Danapala, the newly elected Provincial Councillor (PC), about the killing. Danapala [who expired a few years ago] feared my brother would pose a threat to his life, which was never the case. My brother’s body had been burnt on a tyre-pyre, after the body was shown to the satisfaction of Danapala.

Danapala too had had a land dispute with my father a long time ago. He lost a court case he had filed against my father. There was also a caste difference between Danapala and us. My father, and almost that entire block of the village, belonged to a higher caste than Danapala’s. Katuwana had a number of such blocks of houses called “Mandi”, where people of different castes lived.” 

Chandani’s husband, Chamal (69), related his traumatic experiences as follows:

”On the morning of 29 August, I went with a friend of mine in his car to Katuwana to bring my daughter back home. My friend wanted to meet Danapala Manthree (PC) and request his help to get his nephew released from Walasmulla Army camp. At the road barrier at the Katuwana Army Camp, the army stopped our car. My friend told them we were going to meet Manthree Thuma (Danapala). So, we were allowed to proceed. 

When we reached the place where the house was situated, I could not see the house. I could only see the smoke. I went closer. I could not believe my eyes. The house was demolished and everything was burning. I could see human flesh burning inside the house close to the main door. I saw a skull burning. I could not stand up. One or two villagers came to me and held me tight. A sister of my mother-in -law came to me and said, ‘Nobody is alive. Everybody is burnt’. I shouted, calling my daughter’s name. The aunt told me, ‘You should leave now. If the army comes and finds you, they will kill you too”. My friend then pushed me inside the car and brought me back home. I told my wife everything. She was devastated.

A couple of weeks later, Gamini, one of Danapala’s home guards [Grama Arakshaka – members of government’s Civil Security Force], told me that he and another guard were present with the army when they committed the crime, and asked me not to search for the family as everybody was killed by the army. He told me that the four sisters were taken to Katuwana army camp, raped and tortured there for three days, and then killed. It was not long afterwards that I came to know that both those guards were assassinated.

During the same period, we were trying to lodge complaints at police stations and even searched for them at army camps, as we believed they were still alive in some detention center. When my wife and I went to lodge a complaint at Walasmulla Police, we were chased away. I even dared to go to Walasmulla army camp to meet Captain P.L.U. Buddadhasa of the 6th Battalion, Singha Regiment, to find out some information about my relatives. He just told me, ‘Do not search for them. They are all dead. Do some religious observances for them’.  When I went to complain to the ASP [Assistant Superintendent of Police] office at Tangalle, ASP Ekanayake warned me, saying, ‘You are a teacher; do not try to search for them. Otherwise, you will lose your own life.’

I was able to lodge a complaint at Middeniya Police only in late September 1994, after Madam Chandrika Kumaratunga was elected President. We were also able to complain to the Presidential Commission on Disappearances. The Muttetuwegama Commission’s final report contains the seven names of our relatives.

However, the court case never proceeded after 1998. We have learned that the Police had colluded with Danapala to systematically bury the case, four years after the collection of samples from the massacre site. 

Due to the lasting psychological shock my wife and I had to endure, I could not continue my work as a teacher with sincerity. Therefore, I decided to retire under the Circular No.44/90. Thereafter, the conditions of our family worsened. I had to struggle for sustenance for my family of four children.

Chandrika soon resumed the war with the LTTE [Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]. By 1998, we learned of the crimes committed by the Sri Lankan army against innocent Tamil people in Jaffna. The case of Krishanti Kumaraswamy and her family’s murder at Chemmani shook our souls. Then we realized the extent of the crimes Tamils must have been forced to suffer in the North, sometimes even beyond the crimes committed against our family. Later, Mahinda Rajapaksa continued the war, and his and all succeeding governments praised the mercenaries as ‘Rana Viruvo’ [war heroes]. Throughout, we were silenced.”

He also told us about his experience with the false “human rights” crusaders of the time: 

“The orphaned youngest sister of my wife was studying and living with us during that period. Once, in early 1997, I went with her to meet Mahinda Rajapaksa at his Carlton office, seeking his help to find a job for her. My parents had worked for D.A. Rajapaksa and I myself had, as a youth, campaigned for Mahinda’s elections. So, I knew him personally. After waiting a long time to meet him, we forcibly entered his room and informed him of our predicament after the massacre of the family. He shouted at us: ‘Look, these people have worked for the JVP and got themselves killed, and now have come seeking my help to get jobs’. My sister-in-law was crying. She never received a job from him, nor any assistance.” 

The other surviving daughter, Indumathi expressed her first hand experience of the wrath the local politician had toward the family: 

“Since my father supported the UNP in elections in late 1988 and early 1989, after the general elections, my father went with me to talk to Danapala Manthree. Our parental home was just a few yards away from his residence. He was the uncle of Ananda Kularathna, then UNP cabinet minister from the Mulkirigala seat. We later came to understand that my brother was at that time full time engaged in the activities of the JVP, which had ordered people not to vote at elections [the provincial council election in the Southern Province was held in June 1988]. Danapala seemingly saw his life as threatened by the JVP and its military wing, Deshapremi Janatha Viyaparaya (DJV). However, villagers say my brother never left any room for harm to be inflicted upon anybody in the village, not even on those who envied our family. Danapala ferociously denied any help in finding jobs for me or anyone else in our family. He shouted: ‘There is a terrorist in your house. If it were not for Weda Mahattaya, you and your house would already have been reduced to ashes.’ 

But, neither my parents nor anybody even dreamt of an impending massacre, because we had not heard of such incidents before. 

About two days before the bombing of our home, my elder sister Neela sent me a letter saying that the previous day there had been a bomb blast in the area targeting the army, which had killed several soldiers. My sister wrote that now they felt their lives were also in danger. I think the day she posted that letter was the day she and Hichchi visited my eldest sister at her home in Walasmulla. When she sent that letter, our youngest sister was with me at my house. So, her life was saved.”

Sunitha, the youngest surviving daughter and now a teacher, tearfully recalled her loving parents, her brother, and the harassment by the armed forces:

“My father was a Bodhisattva [a reference to the noble lives of Buddha before enlightenment]. As a skilled physician, sought after by people from different parts of the country, I witnessed how miraculously he saved the lives of many patients who had been brought after snakebites. I also saw how skillfully he cured limb and arm injuries caused by various accidents. My mother was the perfect match for my father. Like a goddess, she was dedicated day and night to treating patients. 

Our father had written and published a couple of Veda Grantha [medicinal books]. They were written in verse form. Sarpa Visha Sanharaya I and II [Neutralizing Serpent Venom], Bilindu Roga Sanharaya [Treating Pediatric Illnesses] were very popular, and Manthra Sathakaya [Hundred Mantras] is a book still being sold in bookstores.

He never harmed anybody, not even an insect. I cannot understand how cruel one must be to aim a weapon at such a man of glory and kill him. This world is cursed!

My brother was very handsome. He was always helpful and empathetic toward others. He was a leader to the village youth. Sometimes, village youth even betrayed him, not because of any wrongdoing he committed, but to save themselves when they were arrested for small disputes and fights.

About ten months before the massacre of our family, the chief of the Katuwana Army Camp came to our former house with other soldiers and asked my father to remove all necessary belongings, as they were going to burn our house at 7:00 p.m. that night. My father pleaded with him: “Do not harm us. If my son has done anything wrong, you may punish him.” But they burned our house. The house by the side of Rukmalpitiya Road, where our family was living at the time of the massacre, was built later, about a hundred meters away from the former house on the same road.

I remember, during the period of state terror, the army often intruded into our home and searched everywhere inside. We were always terrorized. They knew very well that my brother was not there, and that only our elderly parents and we girls were present. They questioned us about our brother and even searched for books. Sometimes, they even came in the middle of the night while we were sleeping. Then they would ask us to turn off the lamps (kerosene lamps) and search here and there.”

A systematized killing spree 

In both the South and the North, the Sri Lankan ruling elite deployed the full apparatus of the state—the military and police, death squads, the Prevention of Terrorism Act, and Emergency Regulations—to eliminate perceived threats to capitalist rule from the political right and, above all, against the innocent rural poor and the oppressed. Theorizing the causes of large scale disappearances during the period, Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) report in December 1997 stated,

 “[U]nder the emergency regulations, all restraints on law enforcement officers were removed, and the power to dispose of dead bodies was left to the sole discretion of these officers. Judicial supervision was suspended. There were no provisions even to keep records of the disposed bodies.”

The report further stated as follows:

“Disappearances were the result of a very deliberate policy and were implemented meticulously according to a plan. Law enforcement officers received instructions to arrest, kill and dispose of the bodies. Enacting emergency regulations made this legally possible. The police were constantly coached to carry out killings, and there were methods of supervising how many were to be killed in each area. Incentives were given through the distribution of money for killer squads. 

Liquor was also provided to these squads to keep them in a mood conducive to participation in such activities. Lists of those who were to be killed were distributed. Special interrogations were held in special places for interrogation. In many instances, the decision to kill was made during these interrogations, and people were murdered in the secret surroundings of these places. Law enforcement officers mingled with illegal elements in undertaking these activities. Politicians were given direct access to these groups so that they could execute the wishes of these politicians.”

The Commission Report and the Buried Lists

In November 1994, president Kumaratunga appointed three presidential commissions to  inquire into incidents of involuntary removals or disappearances of persons after 1 January 1988. The commission chaired by Manouri Muttetuwegama inquired into incidents in Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces.

In response to the Commission’s request to provide information on the officers who were attached to the Katuwana Army Camp at the time, on 30 June 1997, the Army replied “not mentioned” in their records—the same answer given in response to most of the other camps. The Commission did not take any further steps to obtain the information from the Army.

The alleged perpetrators of these crimes were shielded by the very recommendations of the Commission itself. While the Commission “found the information and material upon which the allegations of the witnesses were based to be prima facie credible,” it nevertheless stated: “we recommend that the lists of names of persons alleged to have been responsible for involuntary removals or disappearances sent by us under separate cover be not published,” until further investigations were carried out. No such “further investigations” were ever undertaken by Kumaratunga’s government or by successive governments, thereby granting the perpetrators lifelong impunity and protection to commit further crimes. To this day, these confidential lists and the witness testimonies remain undisclosed to the public.

theSocialist.lk has pointed out the class character of the government’s policies of repression during the counterinsurgency in the South, which were later carried forward against the ethnic Tamil population in the North and East, in order to defend the capitalist unitary state and the interests of finance capital. 

These atrocities of the capitalist state cannot—and could not—be prevented, nor justice established, without the abolition of the parasitic state, its military, police, laws, and capitalist class rule. This is the historic task of the working class, rallying behind it the petty bourgeoisie and the oppressed masses, as part of the united struggle of the South Asian and international working class for socialist policies.

Katuwana Massacre: Relatives commemorate victims after 36 years of intimidation and continuing impunity Read More »

Scroll to Top